Employment discrimination in organizations

Antecedents and consequences

Barry M Goldman, Barbara A. Gutek, Jordan H. Stein, Kyle Lewis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

157 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article reviews the research on employment discrimination in organizations. It focuses on discrimination perceptions, charges, and lawsuits and discusses the consequences of discrimination. Among the conclusions are the following: (a) The proportion of claimants filing under different antidiscrimination statutes differs by race; (b) the area needs theories that can explain wide variance in perceptions of events; (c) the consequences of discrimination are best viewed from individual, group, and organizational levels; and (d) if the results of instruments are used in legal settings, social scientists should pay careful attention to reliability and validity, as well as standards of legally admissible evidence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)786-830
Number of pages45
JournalJournal of Management
Volume32
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2006

Fingerprint

Discrimination in employment
Discrimination
Lawsuit
Proportion
Statute
Charge
Organizational level

Keywords

  • Discrimination
  • Racism
  • Sexism
  • Sexual harassment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Strategy and Management
  • Finance

Cite this

Employment discrimination in organizations : Antecedents and consequences. / Goldman, Barry M; Gutek, Barbara A.; Stein, Jordan H.; Lewis, Kyle.

In: Journal of Management, Vol. 32, No. 6, 12.2006, p. 786-830.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Goldman, Barry M ; Gutek, Barbara A. ; Stein, Jordan H. ; Lewis, Kyle. / Employment discrimination in organizations : Antecedents and consequences. In: Journal of Management. 2006 ; Vol. 32, No. 6. pp. 786-830.
@article{607c7037113f471eb7ec723804ad2221,
title = "Employment discrimination in organizations: Antecedents and consequences",
abstract = "This article reviews the research on employment discrimination in organizations. It focuses on discrimination perceptions, charges, and lawsuits and discusses the consequences of discrimination. Among the conclusions are the following: (a) The proportion of claimants filing under different antidiscrimination statutes differs by race; (b) the area needs theories that can explain wide variance in perceptions of events; (c) the consequences of discrimination are best viewed from individual, group, and organizational levels; and (d) if the results of instruments are used in legal settings, social scientists should pay careful attention to reliability and validity, as well as standards of legally admissible evidence.",
keywords = "Discrimination, Racism, Sexism, Sexual harassment",
author = "Goldman, {Barry M} and Gutek, {Barbara A.} and Stein, {Jordan H.} and Kyle Lewis",
year = "2006",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1177/0149206306293544",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "786--830",
journal = "Journal of Management",
issn = "0149-2063",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Employment discrimination in organizations

T2 - Antecedents and consequences

AU - Goldman, Barry M

AU - Gutek, Barbara A.

AU - Stein, Jordan H.

AU - Lewis, Kyle

PY - 2006/12

Y1 - 2006/12

N2 - This article reviews the research on employment discrimination in organizations. It focuses on discrimination perceptions, charges, and lawsuits and discusses the consequences of discrimination. Among the conclusions are the following: (a) The proportion of claimants filing under different antidiscrimination statutes differs by race; (b) the area needs theories that can explain wide variance in perceptions of events; (c) the consequences of discrimination are best viewed from individual, group, and organizational levels; and (d) if the results of instruments are used in legal settings, social scientists should pay careful attention to reliability and validity, as well as standards of legally admissible evidence.

AB - This article reviews the research on employment discrimination in organizations. It focuses on discrimination perceptions, charges, and lawsuits and discusses the consequences of discrimination. Among the conclusions are the following: (a) The proportion of claimants filing under different antidiscrimination statutes differs by race; (b) the area needs theories that can explain wide variance in perceptions of events; (c) the consequences of discrimination are best viewed from individual, group, and organizational levels; and (d) if the results of instruments are used in legal settings, social scientists should pay careful attention to reliability and validity, as well as standards of legally admissible evidence.

KW - Discrimination

KW - Racism

KW - Sexism

KW - Sexual harassment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33750828720&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33750828720&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0149206306293544

DO - 10.1177/0149206306293544

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 786

EP - 830

JO - Journal of Management

JF - Journal of Management

SN - 0149-2063

IS - 6

ER -