Endoscopic removal of pancreatic duci stones - Better patient selection by endoscopic ultrasound?

L. Aabakken, B. J. Hoffman, M. Bhutani, R. H. Hawes, P. R. Tarnasky, John T Cunningham, P. B. Cotton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Pancreatic duct stones are usually well visualized with endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). Acoustic shadowing indicates hard, calcific stones, and may be a predictor of failure to remove the stone endoscopically. Methods: During 12 months, 14 patients (pts) were found to have one or more stones in the main pancreatic duct (MPD) by EUS, utilizing the Olympus UM20 radial scanning echoendoscope. ERCP was done for attempted stone removal after EUS in 11pts and preEUS in 4 pts. ERCP success was recorded, as well as the EUS findings by reviewing video tapes of the procedures. Results: Twelve of the 14 stones had an unequivocal acoustic shadow, and only one of these was successfully removed at initial ERCP, utilizing a snare piecemeal-technique. The other patients were treated with pancreatic sphincterotomy and stent placement Two stones without an acoustic shadow were both successfully removed, p=0.03. This successrate was significantly higher (Fischers exact test) than for the shadowing stones. Conclusion: These preliminary data indicate that EUS may be used to aid the patient selection to ERP and endoscopic stone removal. Stones with distinct acoustic shadowing may be better managed by initial shock wave lithotripsy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)414
Number of pages1
JournalGastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume43
Issue number4
StatePublished - 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Acoustics
Patient Selection
Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
Pancreatic Ducts
Lithotripsy
Stents

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Aabakken, L., Hoffman, B. J., Bhutani, M., Hawes, R. H., Tarnasky, P. R., Cunningham, J. T., & Cotton, P. B. (1996). Endoscopic removal of pancreatic duci stones - Better patient selection by endoscopic ultrasound? Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 43(4), 414.

Endoscopic removal of pancreatic duci stones - Better patient selection by endoscopic ultrasound? / Aabakken, L.; Hoffman, B. J.; Bhutani, M.; Hawes, R. H.; Tarnasky, P. R.; Cunningham, John T; Cotton, P. B.

In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Vol. 43, No. 4, 1996, p. 414.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Aabakken, L, Hoffman, BJ, Bhutani, M, Hawes, RH, Tarnasky, PR, Cunningham, JT & Cotton, PB 1996, 'Endoscopic removal of pancreatic duci stones - Better patient selection by endoscopic ultrasound?', Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 414.
Aabakken, L. ; Hoffman, B. J. ; Bhutani, M. ; Hawes, R. H. ; Tarnasky, P. R. ; Cunningham, John T ; Cotton, P. B. / Endoscopic removal of pancreatic duci stones - Better patient selection by endoscopic ultrasound?. In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 1996 ; Vol. 43, No. 4. pp. 414.
@article{9592606cde9e470391c5f31ea0ff0eba,
title = "Endoscopic removal of pancreatic duci stones - Better patient selection by endoscopic ultrasound?",
abstract = "Pancreatic duct stones are usually well visualized with endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). Acoustic shadowing indicates hard, calcific stones, and may be a predictor of failure to remove the stone endoscopically. Methods: During 12 months, 14 patients (pts) were found to have one or more stones in the main pancreatic duct (MPD) by EUS, utilizing the Olympus UM20 radial scanning echoendoscope. ERCP was done for attempted stone removal after EUS in 11pts and preEUS in 4 pts. ERCP success was recorded, as well as the EUS findings by reviewing video tapes of the procedures. Results: Twelve of the 14 stones had an unequivocal acoustic shadow, and only one of these was successfully removed at initial ERCP, utilizing a snare piecemeal-technique. The other patients were treated with pancreatic sphincterotomy and stent placement Two stones without an acoustic shadow were both successfully removed, p=0.03. This successrate was significantly higher (Fischers exact test) than for the shadowing stones. Conclusion: These preliminary data indicate that EUS may be used to aid the patient selection to ERP and endoscopic stone removal. Stones with distinct acoustic shadowing may be better managed by initial shock wave lithotripsy.",
author = "L. Aabakken and Hoffman, {B. J.} and M. Bhutani and Hawes, {R. H.} and Tarnasky, {P. R.} and Cunningham, {John T} and Cotton, {P. B.}",
year = "1996",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "414",
journal = "Gastrointestinal Endoscopy",
issn = "0016-5107",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Endoscopic removal of pancreatic duci stones - Better patient selection by endoscopic ultrasound?

AU - Aabakken, L.

AU - Hoffman, B. J.

AU - Bhutani, M.

AU - Hawes, R. H.

AU - Tarnasky, P. R.

AU - Cunningham, John T

AU - Cotton, P. B.

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - Pancreatic duct stones are usually well visualized with endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). Acoustic shadowing indicates hard, calcific stones, and may be a predictor of failure to remove the stone endoscopically. Methods: During 12 months, 14 patients (pts) were found to have one or more stones in the main pancreatic duct (MPD) by EUS, utilizing the Olympus UM20 radial scanning echoendoscope. ERCP was done for attempted stone removal after EUS in 11pts and preEUS in 4 pts. ERCP success was recorded, as well as the EUS findings by reviewing video tapes of the procedures. Results: Twelve of the 14 stones had an unequivocal acoustic shadow, and only one of these was successfully removed at initial ERCP, utilizing a snare piecemeal-technique. The other patients were treated with pancreatic sphincterotomy and stent placement Two stones without an acoustic shadow were both successfully removed, p=0.03. This successrate was significantly higher (Fischers exact test) than for the shadowing stones. Conclusion: These preliminary data indicate that EUS may be used to aid the patient selection to ERP and endoscopic stone removal. Stones with distinct acoustic shadowing may be better managed by initial shock wave lithotripsy.

AB - Pancreatic duct stones are usually well visualized with endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). Acoustic shadowing indicates hard, calcific stones, and may be a predictor of failure to remove the stone endoscopically. Methods: During 12 months, 14 patients (pts) were found to have one or more stones in the main pancreatic duct (MPD) by EUS, utilizing the Olympus UM20 radial scanning echoendoscope. ERCP was done for attempted stone removal after EUS in 11pts and preEUS in 4 pts. ERCP success was recorded, as well as the EUS findings by reviewing video tapes of the procedures. Results: Twelve of the 14 stones had an unequivocal acoustic shadow, and only one of these was successfully removed at initial ERCP, utilizing a snare piecemeal-technique. The other patients were treated with pancreatic sphincterotomy and stent placement Two stones without an acoustic shadow were both successfully removed, p=0.03. This successrate was significantly higher (Fischers exact test) than for the shadowing stones. Conclusion: These preliminary data indicate that EUS may be used to aid the patient selection to ERP and endoscopic stone removal. Stones with distinct acoustic shadowing may be better managed by initial shock wave lithotripsy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=10544239725&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=10544239725&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:10544239725

VL - 43

SP - 414

JO - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

JF - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

SN - 0016-5107

IS - 4

ER -