Enhanced Recovery in Bariatric Surgery: A Study of Short-Term Outcomes and Compliance

Amlish B. Gondal, Chiu-Hsieh Hsu, Federico Serrot, Andrea Rodriguez-Restrepo, Audriana N. Hurbon, Carlos A Galvani, Iman Ghaderi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: The implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) guidelines has been widely studied among various surgical specialties. We aimed at comparing the perioperative outcomes and compliance with ERAS protocol in bariatric surgery at our center. Methods: An observational review of a prospectively maintained database was performed. Patients who underwent primary bariatric surgery (gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy) between January 2011 and June 2018 were included. Patients were divided into pre- and post-ERAS groups. Data including basic demographic information, length of hospital stay, 30-day perioperative complications, and readmission rates were collected. Compliance with elements of ERAS was assessed using a combination of chart review and a prospectively implemented checklist. P < 0.05 was chosen to be statistically significant. Results: A total of 435 patients were included: 239 patients in the pre-ERAS group and 196 patients in the post-ERAS group. There were no statistical differences in baseline demographics and major comorbidities between the 2 groups. The post-ERAS group had shorter length of hospital stay (2.23 vs 1.23, p < 0.001) and lower rates of 30-day postoperative morbidity (8.7 vs 4%, p =.04). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups with respect to readmissions rates. There was no mortality in either group. Overall compliance rates with ERAS elements were 85%; compliance increased significantly with the implementation of a checklist (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Implementation of ERAS program for bariatric surgery is safe and feasible. It reduces hospital stay and postoperative morbidity. Easy to implement strategies such as checklists should be encouraged in bariatric programs to aid in implementation and compliance with ERAS elements for perioperative care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalObesity Surgery
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Bariatric Surgery
Compliance
Length of Stay
Checklist
Demography
Surgical Specialties
Morbidity
Perioperative Care
Bariatrics
Gastric Bypass
Gastrectomy
Comorbidity
Databases
Guidelines

Keywords

  • Bariatric
  • Compliance
  • Enhanced recovery
  • Outcomes
  • Perioperative care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Nutrition and Dietetics

Cite this

Enhanced Recovery in Bariatric Surgery : A Study of Short-Term Outcomes and Compliance. / Gondal, Amlish B.; Hsu, Chiu-Hsieh; Serrot, Federico; Rodriguez-Restrepo, Andrea; Hurbon, Audriana N.; Galvani, Carlos A; Ghaderi, Iman.

In: Obesity Surgery, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gondal, Amlish B. ; Hsu, Chiu-Hsieh ; Serrot, Federico ; Rodriguez-Restrepo, Andrea ; Hurbon, Audriana N. ; Galvani, Carlos A ; Ghaderi, Iman. / Enhanced Recovery in Bariatric Surgery : A Study of Short-Term Outcomes and Compliance. In: Obesity Surgery. 2018.
@article{4b02ef9eb0a047c2bb632e8da4ced5c4,
title = "Enhanced Recovery in Bariatric Surgery: A Study of Short-Term Outcomes and Compliance",
abstract = "Introduction: The implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) guidelines has been widely studied among various surgical specialties. We aimed at comparing the perioperative outcomes and compliance with ERAS protocol in bariatric surgery at our center. Methods: An observational review of a prospectively maintained database was performed. Patients who underwent primary bariatric surgery (gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy) between January 2011 and June 2018 were included. Patients were divided into pre- and post-ERAS groups. Data including basic demographic information, length of hospital stay, 30-day perioperative complications, and readmission rates were collected. Compliance with elements of ERAS was assessed using a combination of chart review and a prospectively implemented checklist. P < 0.05 was chosen to be statistically significant. Results: A total of 435 patients were included: 239 patients in the pre-ERAS group and 196 patients in the post-ERAS group. There were no statistical differences in baseline demographics and major comorbidities between the 2 groups. The post-ERAS group had shorter length of hospital stay (2.23 vs 1.23, p < 0.001) and lower rates of 30-day postoperative morbidity (8.7 vs 4{\%}, p =.04). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups with respect to readmissions rates. There was no mortality in either group. Overall compliance rates with ERAS elements were 85{\%}; compliance increased significantly with the implementation of a checklist (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Implementation of ERAS program for bariatric surgery is safe and feasible. It reduces hospital stay and postoperative morbidity. Easy to implement strategies such as checklists should be encouraged in bariatric programs to aid in implementation and compliance with ERAS elements for perioperative care.",
keywords = "Bariatric, Compliance, Enhanced recovery, Outcomes, Perioperative care",
author = "Gondal, {Amlish B.} and Chiu-Hsieh Hsu and Federico Serrot and Andrea Rodriguez-Restrepo and Hurbon, {Audriana N.} and Galvani, {Carlos A} and Iman Ghaderi",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11695-018-3579-z",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Obesity Surgery",
issn = "0960-8923",
publisher = "Springer New York",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Enhanced Recovery in Bariatric Surgery

T2 - A Study of Short-Term Outcomes and Compliance

AU - Gondal, Amlish B.

AU - Hsu, Chiu-Hsieh

AU - Serrot, Federico

AU - Rodriguez-Restrepo, Andrea

AU - Hurbon, Audriana N.

AU - Galvani, Carlos A

AU - Ghaderi, Iman

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Introduction: The implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) guidelines has been widely studied among various surgical specialties. We aimed at comparing the perioperative outcomes and compliance with ERAS protocol in bariatric surgery at our center. Methods: An observational review of a prospectively maintained database was performed. Patients who underwent primary bariatric surgery (gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy) between January 2011 and June 2018 were included. Patients were divided into pre- and post-ERAS groups. Data including basic demographic information, length of hospital stay, 30-day perioperative complications, and readmission rates were collected. Compliance with elements of ERAS was assessed using a combination of chart review and a prospectively implemented checklist. P < 0.05 was chosen to be statistically significant. Results: A total of 435 patients were included: 239 patients in the pre-ERAS group and 196 patients in the post-ERAS group. There were no statistical differences in baseline demographics and major comorbidities between the 2 groups. The post-ERAS group had shorter length of hospital stay (2.23 vs 1.23, p < 0.001) and lower rates of 30-day postoperative morbidity (8.7 vs 4%, p =.04). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups with respect to readmissions rates. There was no mortality in either group. Overall compliance rates with ERAS elements were 85%; compliance increased significantly with the implementation of a checklist (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Implementation of ERAS program for bariatric surgery is safe and feasible. It reduces hospital stay and postoperative morbidity. Easy to implement strategies such as checklists should be encouraged in bariatric programs to aid in implementation and compliance with ERAS elements for perioperative care.

AB - Introduction: The implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) guidelines has been widely studied among various surgical specialties. We aimed at comparing the perioperative outcomes and compliance with ERAS protocol in bariatric surgery at our center. Methods: An observational review of a prospectively maintained database was performed. Patients who underwent primary bariatric surgery (gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy) between January 2011 and June 2018 were included. Patients were divided into pre- and post-ERAS groups. Data including basic demographic information, length of hospital stay, 30-day perioperative complications, and readmission rates were collected. Compliance with elements of ERAS was assessed using a combination of chart review and a prospectively implemented checklist. P < 0.05 was chosen to be statistically significant. Results: A total of 435 patients were included: 239 patients in the pre-ERAS group and 196 patients in the post-ERAS group. There were no statistical differences in baseline demographics and major comorbidities between the 2 groups. The post-ERAS group had shorter length of hospital stay (2.23 vs 1.23, p < 0.001) and lower rates of 30-day postoperative morbidity (8.7 vs 4%, p =.04). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups with respect to readmissions rates. There was no mortality in either group. Overall compliance rates with ERAS elements were 85%; compliance increased significantly with the implementation of a checklist (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Implementation of ERAS program for bariatric surgery is safe and feasible. It reduces hospital stay and postoperative morbidity. Easy to implement strategies such as checklists should be encouraged in bariatric programs to aid in implementation and compliance with ERAS elements for perioperative care.

KW - Bariatric

KW - Compliance

KW - Enhanced recovery

KW - Outcomes

KW - Perioperative care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056734589&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85056734589&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11695-018-3579-z

DO - 10.1007/s11695-018-3579-z

M3 - Article

C2 - 30443718

AN - SCOPUS:85056734589

JO - Obesity Surgery

JF - Obesity Surgery

SN - 0960-8923

ER -