Ensemble evaluation of hydrologically enhanced Noah-LSM: Partitioning of the water balance in high-resolution simulations over the little washita river experimental watershed

Enrique Rosero, Lindsey E. Gulden, Zong Liang Yang, Luis G. de Goncalves, Guo-Yue Niu, Yasir H. Kaheil

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The ability of two versions of the Noah land surface model (LSM) to simulate the water cycle of the Little Washita River experimental watershed is evaluated. One version that uses the standard hydrological parameterizations of Noah 2.7 (STD) is compared another version that replaces STD's subsurface hydrology with a simple aquifer model and topography-related surface and subsurface runoff parameterizations (GW). Simulations on a distributed grid at fine resolution are compared to the long-term distribution of observed dailymean runoff, the spatial statistics of observed soilmoisture, and locally observed latent heat flux. The evaluation targets the typical behavior of ensembles ofmodels that use realistic, near-optimal sets of parameters important to runoff. STD and GW overestimate the ratio of runoff to evapotranspiration. In the subset of STD and GW runs that best reproduce the timing and the volume of streamflow, the surface-to-subsurface runoff ratio is overestimated and simulated streamflow is much flashier than observations. Both models' soil columns wet and dry too quickly, implying that there are structural shortcomings in the formulation of STD that cannot be overcome by adding GW's increased complexity to the model. In its current formulation, GW extremely underestimates baseflow's contribution to total runoff and requires a shallow water table to function realistically. In the catchment (depth to water table .10 m), GW functions as a simple bucket model. Because model parameters are likely scale and site dependent, the need for even "physically based" models to be extensively calibrated for all domains on which they are applied is underscored.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)45-64
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Hydrometeorology
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2011

Fingerprint

water budget
land surface
partitioning
watershed
runoff
river
simulation
streamflow
water table
parameterization
latent heat flux
baseflow
soil column
evaluation
evapotranspiration
hydrology
shallow water
topography
aquifer
catchment

Keywords

  • Ensembles
  • Land surface models
  • North America
  • Water budget/balance
  • Watersheds

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Atmospheric Science

Cite this

Ensemble evaluation of hydrologically enhanced Noah-LSM : Partitioning of the water balance in high-resolution simulations over the little washita river experimental watershed. / Rosero, Enrique; Gulden, Lindsey E.; Yang, Zong Liang; de Goncalves, Luis G.; Niu, Guo-Yue; Kaheil, Yasir H.

In: Journal of Hydrometeorology, Vol. 12, No. 1, 02.2011, p. 45-64.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{777a764c23ed4024a37d1ce7c92123c5,
title = "Ensemble evaluation of hydrologically enhanced Noah-LSM: Partitioning of the water balance in high-resolution simulations over the little washita river experimental watershed",
abstract = "The ability of two versions of the Noah land surface model (LSM) to simulate the water cycle of the Little Washita River experimental watershed is evaluated. One version that uses the standard hydrological parameterizations of Noah 2.7 (STD) is compared another version that replaces STD's subsurface hydrology with a simple aquifer model and topography-related surface and subsurface runoff parameterizations (GW). Simulations on a distributed grid at fine resolution are compared to the long-term distribution of observed dailymean runoff, the spatial statistics of observed soilmoisture, and locally observed latent heat flux. The evaluation targets the typical behavior of ensembles ofmodels that use realistic, near-optimal sets of parameters important to runoff. STD and GW overestimate the ratio of runoff to evapotranspiration. In the subset of STD and GW runs that best reproduce the timing and the volume of streamflow, the surface-to-subsurface runoff ratio is overestimated and simulated streamflow is much flashier than observations. Both models' soil columns wet and dry too quickly, implying that there are structural shortcomings in the formulation of STD that cannot be overcome by adding GW's increased complexity to the model. In its current formulation, GW extremely underestimates baseflow's contribution to total runoff and requires a shallow water table to function realistically. In the catchment (depth to water table .10 m), GW functions as a simple bucket model. Because model parameters are likely scale and site dependent, the need for even {"}physically based{"} models to be extensively calibrated for all domains on which they are applied is underscored.",
keywords = "Ensembles, Land surface models, North America, Water budget/balance, Watersheds",
author = "Enrique Rosero and Gulden, {Lindsey E.} and Yang, {Zong Liang} and {de Goncalves}, {Luis G.} and Guo-Yue Niu and Kaheil, {Yasir H.}",
year = "2011",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1175/2010JHM1228.1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "45--64",
journal = "Journal of Hydrometeorology",
issn = "1525-755X",
publisher = "American Meteorological Society",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ensemble evaluation of hydrologically enhanced Noah-LSM

T2 - Partitioning of the water balance in high-resolution simulations over the little washita river experimental watershed

AU - Rosero, Enrique

AU - Gulden, Lindsey E.

AU - Yang, Zong Liang

AU - de Goncalves, Luis G.

AU - Niu, Guo-Yue

AU - Kaheil, Yasir H.

PY - 2011/2

Y1 - 2011/2

N2 - The ability of two versions of the Noah land surface model (LSM) to simulate the water cycle of the Little Washita River experimental watershed is evaluated. One version that uses the standard hydrological parameterizations of Noah 2.7 (STD) is compared another version that replaces STD's subsurface hydrology with a simple aquifer model and topography-related surface and subsurface runoff parameterizations (GW). Simulations on a distributed grid at fine resolution are compared to the long-term distribution of observed dailymean runoff, the spatial statistics of observed soilmoisture, and locally observed latent heat flux. The evaluation targets the typical behavior of ensembles ofmodels that use realistic, near-optimal sets of parameters important to runoff. STD and GW overestimate the ratio of runoff to evapotranspiration. In the subset of STD and GW runs that best reproduce the timing and the volume of streamflow, the surface-to-subsurface runoff ratio is overestimated and simulated streamflow is much flashier than observations. Both models' soil columns wet and dry too quickly, implying that there are structural shortcomings in the formulation of STD that cannot be overcome by adding GW's increased complexity to the model. In its current formulation, GW extremely underestimates baseflow's contribution to total runoff and requires a shallow water table to function realistically. In the catchment (depth to water table .10 m), GW functions as a simple bucket model. Because model parameters are likely scale and site dependent, the need for even "physically based" models to be extensively calibrated for all domains on which they are applied is underscored.

AB - The ability of two versions of the Noah land surface model (LSM) to simulate the water cycle of the Little Washita River experimental watershed is evaluated. One version that uses the standard hydrological parameterizations of Noah 2.7 (STD) is compared another version that replaces STD's subsurface hydrology with a simple aquifer model and topography-related surface and subsurface runoff parameterizations (GW). Simulations on a distributed grid at fine resolution are compared to the long-term distribution of observed dailymean runoff, the spatial statistics of observed soilmoisture, and locally observed latent heat flux. The evaluation targets the typical behavior of ensembles ofmodels that use realistic, near-optimal sets of parameters important to runoff. STD and GW overestimate the ratio of runoff to evapotranspiration. In the subset of STD and GW runs that best reproduce the timing and the volume of streamflow, the surface-to-subsurface runoff ratio is overestimated and simulated streamflow is much flashier than observations. Both models' soil columns wet and dry too quickly, implying that there are structural shortcomings in the formulation of STD that cannot be overcome by adding GW's increased complexity to the model. In its current formulation, GW extremely underestimates baseflow's contribution to total runoff and requires a shallow water table to function realistically. In the catchment (depth to water table .10 m), GW functions as a simple bucket model. Because model parameters are likely scale and site dependent, the need for even "physically based" models to be extensively calibrated for all domains on which they are applied is underscored.

KW - Ensembles

KW - Land surface models

KW - North America

KW - Water budget/balance

KW - Watersheds

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79955028959&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79955028959&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1175/2010JHM1228.1

DO - 10.1175/2010JHM1228.1

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79955028959

VL - 12

SP - 45

EP - 64

JO - Journal of Hydrometeorology

JF - Journal of Hydrometeorology

SN - 1525-755X

IS - 1

ER -