Episodic memory reconsolidation: Updating or source confusion?

Almut Hupbach, Rebecca L Gomez, Lynn Nadel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

80 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Reactivation of apparently stable, long-term memory can render it fragile, and dependent on a re-stabilisation process referred to as "reconsolidation". Recently we provided the first demonstration of reconsolidation effects in human episodic memory (Hupbach, Gomez, Hardt, & Nadel, 2007; Hupbach, Hardt, Gomez, & Nadel, 2008). Memory for a set of objects was modified by the presentation of a new set, if and only if participants were reminded of the first learning episode before learning the new set. The present study asks whether this effect can be interpreted as a source discrimination problem; i.e., participants have difficulties remembering which objects were presented during which session, and do not actually incorporate new objects into the reactivated memory. The present study used a recognition test and asked participants directly about the source of their memories. Participants in the no-reminder group showed very few source errors. Participants in the reminder group misattributed the source of objects from the second set as being from the first set but not vice versa, thus demonstrating updating of the original memory. This finding is informative with respect to the misinformation paradigm, and reconsolidation is discussed as a possible mechanism underlying our results and the misinformation effect.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)502-510
Number of pages9
JournalMemory
Volume17
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Confusion
Episodic Memory
Communication
Learning
Long-Term Memory
Research Design

Keywords

  • Memory reconsolidation
  • Misinformation effect
  • Recognition
  • Source memory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Episodic memory reconsolidation : Updating or source confusion? / Hupbach, Almut; Gomez, Rebecca L; Nadel, Lynn.

In: Memory, Vol. 17, No. 5, 2009, p. 502-510.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7063bf7cac054064bb8715853b350c7e,
title = "Episodic memory reconsolidation: Updating or source confusion?",
abstract = "Reactivation of apparently stable, long-term memory can render it fragile, and dependent on a re-stabilisation process referred to as {"}reconsolidation{"}. Recently we provided the first demonstration of reconsolidation effects in human episodic memory (Hupbach, Gomez, Hardt, & Nadel, 2007; Hupbach, Hardt, Gomez, & Nadel, 2008). Memory for a set of objects was modified by the presentation of a new set, if and only if participants were reminded of the first learning episode before learning the new set. The present study asks whether this effect can be interpreted as a source discrimination problem; i.e., participants have difficulties remembering which objects were presented during which session, and do not actually incorporate new objects into the reactivated memory. The present study used a recognition test and asked participants directly about the source of their memories. Participants in the no-reminder group showed very few source errors. Participants in the reminder group misattributed the source of objects from the second set as being from the first set but not vice versa, thus demonstrating updating of the original memory. This finding is informative with respect to the misinformation paradigm, and reconsolidation is discussed as a possible mechanism underlying our results and the misinformation effect.",
keywords = "Memory reconsolidation, Misinformation effect, Recognition, Source memory",
author = "Almut Hupbach and Gomez, {Rebecca L} and Lynn Nadel",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1080/09658210902882399",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "502--510",
journal = "Memory",
issn = "0965-8211",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Episodic memory reconsolidation

T2 - Updating or source confusion?

AU - Hupbach, Almut

AU - Gomez, Rebecca L

AU - Nadel, Lynn

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Reactivation of apparently stable, long-term memory can render it fragile, and dependent on a re-stabilisation process referred to as "reconsolidation". Recently we provided the first demonstration of reconsolidation effects in human episodic memory (Hupbach, Gomez, Hardt, & Nadel, 2007; Hupbach, Hardt, Gomez, & Nadel, 2008). Memory for a set of objects was modified by the presentation of a new set, if and only if participants were reminded of the first learning episode before learning the new set. The present study asks whether this effect can be interpreted as a source discrimination problem; i.e., participants have difficulties remembering which objects were presented during which session, and do not actually incorporate new objects into the reactivated memory. The present study used a recognition test and asked participants directly about the source of their memories. Participants in the no-reminder group showed very few source errors. Participants in the reminder group misattributed the source of objects from the second set as being from the first set but not vice versa, thus demonstrating updating of the original memory. This finding is informative with respect to the misinformation paradigm, and reconsolidation is discussed as a possible mechanism underlying our results and the misinformation effect.

AB - Reactivation of apparently stable, long-term memory can render it fragile, and dependent on a re-stabilisation process referred to as "reconsolidation". Recently we provided the first demonstration of reconsolidation effects in human episodic memory (Hupbach, Gomez, Hardt, & Nadel, 2007; Hupbach, Hardt, Gomez, & Nadel, 2008). Memory for a set of objects was modified by the presentation of a new set, if and only if participants were reminded of the first learning episode before learning the new set. The present study asks whether this effect can be interpreted as a source discrimination problem; i.e., participants have difficulties remembering which objects were presented during which session, and do not actually incorporate new objects into the reactivated memory. The present study used a recognition test and asked participants directly about the source of their memories. Participants in the no-reminder group showed very few source errors. Participants in the reminder group misattributed the source of objects from the second set as being from the first set but not vice versa, thus demonstrating updating of the original memory. This finding is informative with respect to the misinformation paradigm, and reconsolidation is discussed as a possible mechanism underlying our results and the misinformation effect.

KW - Memory reconsolidation

KW - Misinformation effect

KW - Recognition

KW - Source memory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=68349158883&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=68349158883&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09658210902882399

DO - 10.1080/09658210902882399

M3 - Article

C2 - 19468955

AN - SCOPUS:68349158883

VL - 17

SP - 502

EP - 510

JO - Memory

JF - Memory

SN - 0965-8211

IS - 5

ER -