ERCP biliary stenting practice; A prospective multicenter study

P. B. Cotton, H. Evangelou, John T Cunningham, R. H. Hawes, P. R. Tarnasky, A. N. Barkun, P. S. Jowell, J. W C Leung, J. G. Lee, S. M. Schutz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Methods: Six centers offering comprehensive ERCP services used the GI-Trac database prospectively to analyze and compare endoscopy practices. There were 3 University referral centers (Medical University of SC; University of CA, Davis; McGill University, Montreal), two Veterans Affairs Hospitals (Durham NC, Portland OR) and one Air Force Hospital (San Antonio TX). Results: Among 2181 ERCPs, 306 patients received biliary stents, of which only 28 (9%) were metallic. Indications for polyethylene biliary stents were: malignancy (49%), temporary for stones (16%), biliary leaks (15%), benign biliary strictures (14%), and temporary for sphincter dysfunction (7%). Of the malignancies, 57% were pancreatic, 37% biliary, and 6% papillary. 78% of polyethylene stents were of 10 French Gauge (FG), 20% were 7 FG (mainly used for leaks and sphincter dysfunction), and 2% were 11.5 FG. Only 20% of patients receiving polyethylene stents for malignancy underwent biliary sphincterotomy, and only 3% received more than one biliary stent. Complications occurred in only 10 (3.6%) of patients receiving polyethylene stents; half of the complications were mild, and only 1 (0.3%) was fatal. Prophylactic stent exchange was planned in less than half of the patients receiving polyethylene stents for malignancy. Expandable metal stents were used only for malignancy, all with sphincterotomy, and, in 20 (71%) of 28 cases, only after failure of previous polyethylene stenting. There were no significant differences in the patterns of activity measured in the different centers. Conclusions: A shared database allows comparison of practices in different health care environments, analysis of differences, and a powerful method for clinical research and quality control.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)309
Number of pages1
JournalGastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume43
Issue number4
StatePublished - 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
Multicenter Studies
Stents
Polyethylene
Prospective Studies
Neoplasms
Databases
Veterans Hospitals
Military Hospitals
Quality Control
Endoscopy
Pathologic Constriction
Referral and Consultation
Metals
Delivery of Health Care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Cotton, P. B., Evangelou, H., Cunningham, J. T., Hawes, R. H., Tarnasky, P. R., Barkun, A. N., ... Schutz, S. M. (1996). ERCP biliary stenting practice; A prospective multicenter study. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 43(4), 309.

ERCP biliary stenting practice; A prospective multicenter study. / Cotton, P. B.; Evangelou, H.; Cunningham, John T; Hawes, R. H.; Tarnasky, P. R.; Barkun, A. N.; Jowell, P. S.; Leung, J. W C; Lee, J. G.; Schutz, S. M.

In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Vol. 43, No. 4, 1996, p. 309.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cotton, PB, Evangelou, H, Cunningham, JT, Hawes, RH, Tarnasky, PR, Barkun, AN, Jowell, PS, Leung, JWC, Lee, JG & Schutz, SM 1996, 'ERCP biliary stenting practice; A prospective multicenter study', Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 309.
Cotton PB, Evangelou H, Cunningham JT, Hawes RH, Tarnasky PR, Barkun AN et al. ERCP biliary stenting practice; A prospective multicenter study. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 1996;43(4):309.
Cotton, P. B. ; Evangelou, H. ; Cunningham, John T ; Hawes, R. H. ; Tarnasky, P. R. ; Barkun, A. N. ; Jowell, P. S. ; Leung, J. W C ; Lee, J. G. ; Schutz, S. M. / ERCP biliary stenting practice; A prospective multicenter study. In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 1996 ; Vol. 43, No. 4. pp. 309.
@article{bedb9490981541e395c607e30f348e74,
title = "ERCP biliary stenting practice; A prospective multicenter study",
abstract = "Methods: Six centers offering comprehensive ERCP services used the GI-Trac database prospectively to analyze and compare endoscopy practices. There were 3 University referral centers (Medical University of SC; University of CA, Davis; McGill University, Montreal), two Veterans Affairs Hospitals (Durham NC, Portland OR) and one Air Force Hospital (San Antonio TX). Results: Among 2181 ERCPs, 306 patients received biliary stents, of which only 28 (9{\%}) were metallic. Indications for polyethylene biliary stents were: malignancy (49{\%}), temporary for stones (16{\%}), biliary leaks (15{\%}), benign biliary strictures (14{\%}), and temporary for sphincter dysfunction (7{\%}). Of the malignancies, 57{\%} were pancreatic, 37{\%} biliary, and 6{\%} papillary. 78{\%} of polyethylene stents were of 10 French Gauge (FG), 20{\%} were 7 FG (mainly used for leaks and sphincter dysfunction), and 2{\%} were 11.5 FG. Only 20{\%} of patients receiving polyethylene stents for malignancy underwent biliary sphincterotomy, and only 3{\%} received more than one biliary stent. Complications occurred in only 10 (3.6{\%}) of patients receiving polyethylene stents; half of the complications were mild, and only 1 (0.3{\%}) was fatal. Prophylactic stent exchange was planned in less than half of the patients receiving polyethylene stents for malignancy. Expandable metal stents were used only for malignancy, all with sphincterotomy, and, in 20 (71{\%}) of 28 cases, only after failure of previous polyethylene stenting. There were no significant differences in the patterns of activity measured in the different centers. Conclusions: A shared database allows comparison of practices in different health care environments, analysis of differences, and a powerful method for clinical research and quality control.",
author = "Cotton, {P. B.} and H. Evangelou and Cunningham, {John T} and Hawes, {R. H.} and Tarnasky, {P. R.} and Barkun, {A. N.} and Jowell, {P. S.} and Leung, {J. W C} and Lee, {J. G.} and Schutz, {S. M.}",
year = "1996",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "309",
journal = "Gastrointestinal Endoscopy",
issn = "0016-5107",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - ERCP biliary stenting practice; A prospective multicenter study

AU - Cotton, P. B.

AU - Evangelou, H.

AU - Cunningham, John T

AU - Hawes, R. H.

AU - Tarnasky, P. R.

AU - Barkun, A. N.

AU - Jowell, P. S.

AU - Leung, J. W C

AU - Lee, J. G.

AU - Schutz, S. M.

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - Methods: Six centers offering comprehensive ERCP services used the GI-Trac database prospectively to analyze and compare endoscopy practices. There were 3 University referral centers (Medical University of SC; University of CA, Davis; McGill University, Montreal), two Veterans Affairs Hospitals (Durham NC, Portland OR) and one Air Force Hospital (San Antonio TX). Results: Among 2181 ERCPs, 306 patients received biliary stents, of which only 28 (9%) were metallic. Indications for polyethylene biliary stents were: malignancy (49%), temporary for stones (16%), biliary leaks (15%), benign biliary strictures (14%), and temporary for sphincter dysfunction (7%). Of the malignancies, 57% were pancreatic, 37% biliary, and 6% papillary. 78% of polyethylene stents were of 10 French Gauge (FG), 20% were 7 FG (mainly used for leaks and sphincter dysfunction), and 2% were 11.5 FG. Only 20% of patients receiving polyethylene stents for malignancy underwent biliary sphincterotomy, and only 3% received more than one biliary stent. Complications occurred in only 10 (3.6%) of patients receiving polyethylene stents; half of the complications were mild, and only 1 (0.3%) was fatal. Prophylactic stent exchange was planned in less than half of the patients receiving polyethylene stents for malignancy. Expandable metal stents were used only for malignancy, all with sphincterotomy, and, in 20 (71%) of 28 cases, only after failure of previous polyethylene stenting. There were no significant differences in the patterns of activity measured in the different centers. Conclusions: A shared database allows comparison of practices in different health care environments, analysis of differences, and a powerful method for clinical research and quality control.

AB - Methods: Six centers offering comprehensive ERCP services used the GI-Trac database prospectively to analyze and compare endoscopy practices. There were 3 University referral centers (Medical University of SC; University of CA, Davis; McGill University, Montreal), two Veterans Affairs Hospitals (Durham NC, Portland OR) and one Air Force Hospital (San Antonio TX). Results: Among 2181 ERCPs, 306 patients received biliary stents, of which only 28 (9%) were metallic. Indications for polyethylene biliary stents were: malignancy (49%), temporary for stones (16%), biliary leaks (15%), benign biliary strictures (14%), and temporary for sphincter dysfunction (7%). Of the malignancies, 57% were pancreatic, 37% biliary, and 6% papillary. 78% of polyethylene stents were of 10 French Gauge (FG), 20% were 7 FG (mainly used for leaks and sphincter dysfunction), and 2% were 11.5 FG. Only 20% of patients receiving polyethylene stents for malignancy underwent biliary sphincterotomy, and only 3% received more than one biliary stent. Complications occurred in only 10 (3.6%) of patients receiving polyethylene stents; half of the complications were mild, and only 1 (0.3%) was fatal. Prophylactic stent exchange was planned in less than half of the patients receiving polyethylene stents for malignancy. Expandable metal stents were used only for malignancy, all with sphincterotomy, and, in 20 (71%) of 28 cases, only after failure of previous polyethylene stenting. There were no significant differences in the patterns of activity measured in the different centers. Conclusions: A shared database allows comparison of practices in different health care environments, analysis of differences, and a powerful method for clinical research and quality control.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=3042820269&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=3042820269&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:3042820269

VL - 43

SP - 309

JO - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

JF - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

SN - 0016-5107

IS - 4

ER -