Erratum: Corrigendum to “Low-temperature storage of transplants at the light compensation point: air temperature and light intensity for growth suppression and quality preservation’’ (Scientia Horticulturae (1995) 61(3-4) (193–204))

Chieri Kubota, Toyoki Kozai

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

The authors regret that we have missed acknowledging the original source of Fig. 3a and Table 3 (photoautotrophic conditions). The following addition in italics needs to be made to properly acknowledge the source. Fig. 3. Changes over time in CO2 concentrations inside and outside the vessel during 6 weeks of storage. The broccoli plantlets were cultured (a) photoautotrophically (without sugar in the medium) (Kubota and Kozai, 1994; with the permission granted by the American Society for Horticultural Science) and (b) photomixotrophically (with sugar in the medium). Vertical lines represent standard deviations. For details of the experiments, see Table 2 and the text. Table 3. Chlorophyll concentrations on a leaf dry weight (DW) basis (Cc) and chlorophyll fluorescence parameter fmax/f0 of the plantlets before and after 3 or 6 weeks of storage, when cultured photoautotrophically or photomixotrophically. The values shown are means ± SD. The data collected under photoautotrophic conditions (Kubota and Kozai, 1994) are presented with the permission granted by the American Society for Horticultural Science). The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience ca

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)323
Number of pages1
JournalScientia Horticulturae
Volume209
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 19 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

storage temperature
plantlets
light intensity
air temperature
sugars
chlorophyll
broccoli
fluorescence
leaves

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Horticulture

Cite this

@article{40aea77ab42b4b24b666714e3e07a448,
title = "Erratum: Corrigendum to “Low-temperature storage of transplants at the light compensation point: air temperature and light intensity for growth suppression and quality preservation’’ (Scientia Horticulturae (1995) 61(3-4) (193–204))",
abstract = "The authors regret that we have missed acknowledging the original source of Fig. 3a and Table 3 (photoautotrophic conditions). The following addition in italics needs to be made to properly acknowledge the source. Fig. 3. Changes over time in CO2 concentrations inside and outside the vessel during 6 weeks of storage. The broccoli plantlets were cultured (a) photoautotrophically (without sugar in the medium) (Kubota and Kozai, 1994; with the permission granted by the American Society for Horticultural Science) and (b) photomixotrophically (with sugar in the medium). Vertical lines represent standard deviations. For details of the experiments, see Table 2 and the text. Table 3. Chlorophyll concentrations on a leaf dry weight (DW) basis (Cc) and chlorophyll fluorescence parameter fmax/f0 of the plantlets before and after 3 or 6 weeks of storage, when cultured photoautotrophically or photomixotrophically. The values shown are means ± SD. The data collected under photoautotrophic conditions (Kubota and Kozai, 1994) are presented with the permission granted by the American Society for Horticultural Science). The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience ca",
author = "Chieri Kubota and Toyoki Kozai",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "19",
doi = "10.1016/j.scienta.2016.06.025",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "209",
pages = "323",
journal = "Scientia Horticulturae",
issn = "0304-4238",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Erratum

T2 - Corrigendum to “Low-temperature storage of transplants at the light compensation point: air temperature and light intensity for growth suppression and quality preservation’’ (Scientia Horticulturae (1995) 61(3-4) (193–204))

AU - Kubota, Chieri

AU - Kozai, Toyoki

PY - 2016/9/19

Y1 - 2016/9/19

N2 - The authors regret that we have missed acknowledging the original source of Fig. 3a and Table 3 (photoautotrophic conditions). The following addition in italics needs to be made to properly acknowledge the source. Fig. 3. Changes over time in CO2 concentrations inside and outside the vessel during 6 weeks of storage. The broccoli plantlets were cultured (a) photoautotrophically (without sugar in the medium) (Kubota and Kozai, 1994; with the permission granted by the American Society for Horticultural Science) and (b) photomixotrophically (with sugar in the medium). Vertical lines represent standard deviations. For details of the experiments, see Table 2 and the text. Table 3. Chlorophyll concentrations on a leaf dry weight (DW) basis (Cc) and chlorophyll fluorescence parameter fmax/f0 of the plantlets before and after 3 or 6 weeks of storage, when cultured photoautotrophically or photomixotrophically. The values shown are means ± SD. The data collected under photoautotrophic conditions (Kubota and Kozai, 1994) are presented with the permission granted by the American Society for Horticultural Science). The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience ca

AB - The authors regret that we have missed acknowledging the original source of Fig. 3a and Table 3 (photoautotrophic conditions). The following addition in italics needs to be made to properly acknowledge the source. Fig. 3. Changes over time in CO2 concentrations inside and outside the vessel during 6 weeks of storage. The broccoli plantlets were cultured (a) photoautotrophically (without sugar in the medium) (Kubota and Kozai, 1994; with the permission granted by the American Society for Horticultural Science) and (b) photomixotrophically (with sugar in the medium). Vertical lines represent standard deviations. For details of the experiments, see Table 2 and the text. Table 3. Chlorophyll concentrations on a leaf dry weight (DW) basis (Cc) and chlorophyll fluorescence parameter fmax/f0 of the plantlets before and after 3 or 6 weeks of storage, when cultured photoautotrophically or photomixotrophically. The values shown are means ± SD. The data collected under photoautotrophic conditions (Kubota and Kozai, 1994) are presented with the permission granted by the American Society for Horticultural Science). The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience ca

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84989836667&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84989836667&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.scienta.2016.06.025

DO - 10.1016/j.scienta.2016.06.025

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:84989836667

VL - 209

SP - 323

JO - Scientia Horticulturae

JF - Scientia Horticulturae

SN - 0304-4238

ER -