Erratum: Effectiveness of enhanced pulse oximetry sonifications for conveying oxygen saturation ranges: a laboratory comparison of five auditory displays (British Journal of Anaesthesia (2017) 119(6) (1224–1230)(S0007091217541513)(10.1093/bja/aex343))

E. Paterson, P. M. Sanderson, N. A.B. Paterson, R. G. Loeb

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2017; 1–7, DOI 10.1093/bja/aex343 The above paper has been adapted to add the editor's key points. The Publisher would like to apologise for the omission in the original paper.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Number of pages1
JournalBritish Journal of Anaesthesia
Volume119
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2017

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Erratum: Effectiveness of enhanced pulse oximetry sonifications for conveying oxygen saturation ranges: a laboratory comparison of five auditory displays (British Journal of Anaesthesia (2017) 119(6) (1224–1230)(S0007091217541513)(10.1093/bja/aex343))'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this