Establishing a foundation for collaborative scenario elicitation

Ann M. Mickey, Douglas L. Dean, Jay F Nunamaker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Eliciting and integrating requirements from large groups of diverse users remains a major challenge for the software engineering community. Scenarios are becoming recognized as valuable means of identifying actions taken by users when executing a business process and interacting with an information system, and therefore have great potential for addressing requirements elicitation problems. A review of the scenario literature indicates that, although there is widespread agreement on the usefulness of scenarios, there are many unanswered questions about how to elicit scenario definitions from individual users and user groups efficiently. This research examines how increasing the structure of scenario definitions affects scenario quality and the efficiency of scenario definition by individual users. During a laboratory experiment, subjects defined scenarios using a general-purpose GSS, GroupSystems Group Outliner, with one of three textual scenario formats that ranged from unstructured to very structured. Scenario quality and the efficiency of scenario definition by users were compared across the formats. Results highlighted the efficiency of the unstructured format but revealed that all formats produced incomplete scenario definitions. Recommendations are made for an iterative collaborative scenario process and a special-purpose GSS scenario tool that may overcome some of these problems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)92-109
Number of pages18
JournalData Base for Advances in Information Systems
Volume30
Issue number3-4
StatePublished - Jun 1999

Fingerprint

Software engineering
Information systems
Scenarios
Industry
Experiments

Keywords

  • Group support systems
  • Information requirements determination
  • IS development methods and tools
  • Participative design
  • Scenarios

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Science(all)
  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)

Cite this

Establishing a foundation for collaborative scenario elicitation. / Mickey, Ann M.; Dean, Douglas L.; Nunamaker, Jay F.

In: Data Base for Advances in Information Systems, Vol. 30, No. 3-4, 06.1999, p. 92-109.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{514fedf643e143d2b9248048c46ea601,
title = "Establishing a foundation for collaborative scenario elicitation",
abstract = "Eliciting and integrating requirements from large groups of diverse users remains a major challenge for the software engineering community. Scenarios are becoming recognized as valuable means of identifying actions taken by users when executing a business process and interacting with an information system, and therefore have great potential for addressing requirements elicitation problems. A review of the scenario literature indicates that, although there is widespread agreement on the usefulness of scenarios, there are many unanswered questions about how to elicit scenario definitions from individual users and user groups efficiently. This research examines how increasing the structure of scenario definitions affects scenario quality and the efficiency of scenario definition by individual users. During a laboratory experiment, subjects defined scenarios using a general-purpose GSS, GroupSystems Group Outliner, with one of three textual scenario formats that ranged from unstructured to very structured. Scenario quality and the efficiency of scenario definition by users were compared across the formats. Results highlighted the efficiency of the unstructured format but revealed that all formats produced incomplete scenario definitions. Recommendations are made for an iterative collaborative scenario process and a special-purpose GSS scenario tool that may overcome some of these problems.",
keywords = "Group support systems, Information requirements determination, IS development methods and tools, Participative design, Scenarios",
author = "Mickey, {Ann M.} and Dean, {Douglas L.} and Nunamaker, {Jay F}",
year = "1999",
month = "6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "92--109",
journal = "Data Base for Advances in Information Systems",
issn = "1532-0936",
publisher = "Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)",
number = "3-4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Establishing a foundation for collaborative scenario elicitation

AU - Mickey, Ann M.

AU - Dean, Douglas L.

AU - Nunamaker, Jay F

PY - 1999/6

Y1 - 1999/6

N2 - Eliciting and integrating requirements from large groups of diverse users remains a major challenge for the software engineering community. Scenarios are becoming recognized as valuable means of identifying actions taken by users when executing a business process and interacting with an information system, and therefore have great potential for addressing requirements elicitation problems. A review of the scenario literature indicates that, although there is widespread agreement on the usefulness of scenarios, there are many unanswered questions about how to elicit scenario definitions from individual users and user groups efficiently. This research examines how increasing the structure of scenario definitions affects scenario quality and the efficiency of scenario definition by individual users. During a laboratory experiment, subjects defined scenarios using a general-purpose GSS, GroupSystems Group Outliner, with one of three textual scenario formats that ranged from unstructured to very structured. Scenario quality and the efficiency of scenario definition by users were compared across the formats. Results highlighted the efficiency of the unstructured format but revealed that all formats produced incomplete scenario definitions. Recommendations are made for an iterative collaborative scenario process and a special-purpose GSS scenario tool that may overcome some of these problems.

AB - Eliciting and integrating requirements from large groups of diverse users remains a major challenge for the software engineering community. Scenarios are becoming recognized as valuable means of identifying actions taken by users when executing a business process and interacting with an information system, and therefore have great potential for addressing requirements elicitation problems. A review of the scenario literature indicates that, although there is widespread agreement on the usefulness of scenarios, there are many unanswered questions about how to elicit scenario definitions from individual users and user groups efficiently. This research examines how increasing the structure of scenario definitions affects scenario quality and the efficiency of scenario definition by individual users. During a laboratory experiment, subjects defined scenarios using a general-purpose GSS, GroupSystems Group Outliner, with one of three textual scenario formats that ranged from unstructured to very structured. Scenario quality and the efficiency of scenario definition by users were compared across the formats. Results highlighted the efficiency of the unstructured format but revealed that all formats produced incomplete scenario definitions. Recommendations are made for an iterative collaborative scenario process and a special-purpose GSS scenario tool that may overcome some of these problems.

KW - Group support systems

KW - Information requirements determination

KW - IS development methods and tools

KW - Participative design

KW - Scenarios

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1242273257&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1242273257&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 92

EP - 109

JO - Data Base for Advances in Information Systems

JF - Data Base for Advances in Information Systems

SN - 1532-0936

IS - 3-4

ER -