Estimating causal parameters without target populations

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Rationale: In recent years, numerous research methodologists have argued forcefully that any estimated effect from an observational study or a randomized trial should apply to a 'target population' - to a finite group of people. Some methods to adjust for confounders heavily draw upon this idea. Aims and Objectives: I cite a recently published paper in The American Journal of Epidemiology that linked methods to adjust for confounders to the concept of a 'target population'. I explain that the requirement to specify a finite population as the target of causal inference is rooted in two extreme models of causation: determinism and stochastic causation. Conclusions: I argue that the 'target population' epistemology is scientifically irrelevant and so are methods to handle confounders that are founded on this paradigm, namely, standardization, inverse-probability-of-treatment weighting and SMR-weighting. Finally, I propose a simple alternative framework under an indeterministic model of causation. According to my proposed model, a causal parameter is not tied to any finite population and its estimate is a (fallible) scientific conjecture about a homogeneous, individual-level effect.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)814-816
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
Volume13
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2007

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • Causal parameter
  • Confounding
  • Target population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health Information Management
  • Nursing(all)

Cite this