Estimating the effect of hand hygiene compliance and surface cleaning timing on infection risk reductions with a mathematical modeling approach

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Quantitative tools are needed to relate infection control interventions to infection risk reductions. Methods: A model for predicting virus concentrations on hands was used to predict rotavirus, rhinovirus, and influenza A virus doses. Variability in behaviors, transfer efficiencies for various contact types, and surface areas of contact were included. Dose-response curves were used to relate estimated doses to infection risks. Percent reductions from baseline in average rotavirus, rhinovirus, and influenza A virus dose and infection risk were calculated for interventions. Results: Baseline average infection risks for rotavirus, rhinovirus, and influenza A virus were 0.43, 0.20, and 5.51 × 10−6, respectively. One and 2 cleaning events decreased average viral infection risks by 6.98%-17.06% and 13.95%-34.66%, respectively. A 15% increase in hand compliance decreased average infection risks by 6.98%-20.51%. A 15% increase in hand hygiene compliance paired with 2 cleaning events decreased average infection risks by 20.93%-47.55%. Discussion: This study demonstrates the infection risk benefits of combined interventions. Conclusions: Models such as the one in this study could be used to optimize timing and frequency of cleaning events and to create hand hygiene compliance goals to achieve infection risk targets.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAmerican Journal of Infection Control
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Hand Hygiene
Risk Reduction Behavior
Rhinovirus
Infection
Influenza A virus
Rotavirus
Virus Diseases
Hand
Rotavirus Infections
Infection Control
Compliance
Viruses

Keywords

  • Infection control
  • Intervention efficacy
  • QMRA
  • Virus

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Infectious Diseases

Cite this

@article{dcc4a8d0d6fd44cca7cde46c29db55eb,
title = "Estimating the effect of hand hygiene compliance and surface cleaning timing on infection risk reductions with a mathematical modeling approach",
abstract = "Background: Quantitative tools are needed to relate infection control interventions to infection risk reductions. Methods: A model for predicting virus concentrations on hands was used to predict rotavirus, rhinovirus, and influenza A virus doses. Variability in behaviors, transfer efficiencies for various contact types, and surface areas of contact were included. Dose-response curves were used to relate estimated doses to infection risks. Percent reductions from baseline in average rotavirus, rhinovirus, and influenza A virus dose and infection risk were calculated for interventions. Results: Baseline average infection risks for rotavirus, rhinovirus, and influenza A virus were 0.43, 0.20, and 5.51 × 10−6, respectively. One and 2 cleaning events decreased average viral infection risks by 6.98{\%}-17.06{\%} and 13.95{\%}-34.66{\%}, respectively. A 15{\%} increase in hand compliance decreased average infection risks by 6.98{\%}-20.51{\%}. A 15{\%} increase in hand hygiene compliance paired with 2 cleaning events decreased average infection risks by 20.93{\%}-47.55{\%}. Discussion: This study demonstrates the infection risk benefits of combined interventions. Conclusions: Models such as the one in this study could be used to optimize timing and frequency of cleaning events and to create hand hygiene compliance goals to achieve infection risk targets.",
keywords = "Infection control, Intervention efficacy, QMRA, Virus",
author = "Wilson, {Amanda M.} and Reynolds, {Kelly A} and Canales, {Robert A}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajic.2019.05.023",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "American Journal of Infection Control",
issn = "0196-6553",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Estimating the effect of hand hygiene compliance and surface cleaning timing on infection risk reductions with a mathematical modeling approach

AU - Wilson, Amanda M.

AU - Reynolds, Kelly A

AU - Canales, Robert A

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Background: Quantitative tools are needed to relate infection control interventions to infection risk reductions. Methods: A model for predicting virus concentrations on hands was used to predict rotavirus, rhinovirus, and influenza A virus doses. Variability in behaviors, transfer efficiencies for various contact types, and surface areas of contact were included. Dose-response curves were used to relate estimated doses to infection risks. Percent reductions from baseline in average rotavirus, rhinovirus, and influenza A virus dose and infection risk were calculated for interventions. Results: Baseline average infection risks for rotavirus, rhinovirus, and influenza A virus were 0.43, 0.20, and 5.51 × 10−6, respectively. One and 2 cleaning events decreased average viral infection risks by 6.98%-17.06% and 13.95%-34.66%, respectively. A 15% increase in hand compliance decreased average infection risks by 6.98%-20.51%. A 15% increase in hand hygiene compliance paired with 2 cleaning events decreased average infection risks by 20.93%-47.55%. Discussion: This study demonstrates the infection risk benefits of combined interventions. Conclusions: Models such as the one in this study could be used to optimize timing and frequency of cleaning events and to create hand hygiene compliance goals to achieve infection risk targets.

AB - Background: Quantitative tools are needed to relate infection control interventions to infection risk reductions. Methods: A model for predicting virus concentrations on hands was used to predict rotavirus, rhinovirus, and influenza A virus doses. Variability in behaviors, transfer efficiencies for various contact types, and surface areas of contact were included. Dose-response curves were used to relate estimated doses to infection risks. Percent reductions from baseline in average rotavirus, rhinovirus, and influenza A virus dose and infection risk were calculated for interventions. Results: Baseline average infection risks for rotavirus, rhinovirus, and influenza A virus were 0.43, 0.20, and 5.51 × 10−6, respectively. One and 2 cleaning events decreased average viral infection risks by 6.98%-17.06% and 13.95%-34.66%, respectively. A 15% increase in hand compliance decreased average infection risks by 6.98%-20.51%. A 15% increase in hand hygiene compliance paired with 2 cleaning events decreased average infection risks by 20.93%-47.55%. Discussion: This study demonstrates the infection risk benefits of combined interventions. Conclusions: Models such as the one in this study could be used to optimize timing and frequency of cleaning events and to create hand hygiene compliance goals to achieve infection risk targets.

KW - Infection control

KW - Intervention efficacy

KW - QMRA

KW - Virus

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069612690&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85069612690&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajic.2019.05.023

DO - 10.1016/j.ajic.2019.05.023

M3 - Article

C2 - 31331717

AN - SCOPUS:85069612690

JO - American Journal of Infection Control

JF - American Journal of Infection Control

SN - 0196-6553

ER -