Estimating the Mass of the Milky Way Using the Ensemble of Classical Satellite Galaxies

Ekta Patel, Gurtina Besla, Kaisey Mandel, Sangmo Tony Sohn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

High precision proper motion (PM) measurements are available for approximately 20% of all known dwarf satellite galaxies of the Milky Way (MW). Here we extend the Bayesian framework of Patel et al. to include all MW satellites with measured 6D phase-space information and apply it with the Illustris-Dark simulation to constrain the MW's mass. Using the properties of each MW satellite individually, we find that the scatter among mass estimates is reduced when the magnitude of specific orbital angular momentum (j) is adopted, rather than their combined instantaneous positions and velocities. We also find that high j satellites (i.e., Leo II) constrain the upper limits for the MW's mass and low j satellites, rather than the highest speed satellites (i.e., Leo I and Large Magellanic Cloud), set the lower mass limits. When j of all classical satellites is used to simultaneously estimate the MW's mass, we conclude the halo mass is 0.85+0.23 -0.26 × 1012M (including Sagittarius dSph) and 0.96+0.29 -0.28 × 1012 M (excluding Sagittarius dSph), cautioning that low j satellites on decaying orbits like Sagittarius dSph may bias the distribution. These estimates markedly reduce the current factor of two spread in the mass range of the MW. We also find a well-defined relationship between host halo mass and satellite j distribution, which yields the prediction that upcoming PMs for ultra-faint dwarfs should reveal j within 5 × 103-104 kpc km s-1. This is a promising method to significantly constrain the cosmologically expected mass range for the MW and eventually M31 as more satellite PMs become available.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number78
JournalAstrophysical Journal
Volume857
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 20 2018

Fingerprint

estimating
galaxies
halos
estimates
proper motion
Magellanic clouds
angular momentum
high speed
orbits
orbitals
prediction
predictions
simulation

Keywords

  • galaxies: evolution
  • galaxies: fundamental parameters
  • galaxies: kinematics and dynamics
  • Local Group

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Space and Planetary Science

Cite this

Estimating the Mass of the Milky Way Using the Ensemble of Classical Satellite Galaxies. / Patel, Ekta; Besla, Gurtina; Mandel, Kaisey; Sohn, Sangmo Tony.

In: Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 857, No. 2, 78, 20.04.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{931bcfef579d420094e02f682735efc2,
title = "Estimating the Mass of the Milky Way Using the Ensemble of Classical Satellite Galaxies",
abstract = "High precision proper motion (PM) measurements are available for approximately 20{\%} of all known dwarf satellite galaxies of the Milky Way (MW). Here we extend the Bayesian framework of Patel et al. to include all MW satellites with measured 6D phase-space information and apply it with the Illustris-Dark simulation to constrain the MW's mass. Using the properties of each MW satellite individually, we find that the scatter among mass estimates is reduced when the magnitude of specific orbital angular momentum (j) is adopted, rather than their combined instantaneous positions and velocities. We also find that high j satellites (i.e., Leo II) constrain the upper limits for the MW's mass and low j satellites, rather than the highest speed satellites (i.e., Leo I and Large Magellanic Cloud), set the lower mass limits. When j of all classical satellites is used to simultaneously estimate the MW's mass, we conclude the halo mass is 0.85+0.23 -0.26 × 1012M⊙ (including Sagittarius dSph) and 0.96+0.29 -0.28 × 1012 M⊙ (excluding Sagittarius dSph), cautioning that low j satellites on decaying orbits like Sagittarius dSph may bias the distribution. These estimates markedly reduce the current factor of two spread in the mass range of the MW. We also find a well-defined relationship between host halo mass and satellite j distribution, which yields the prediction that upcoming PMs for ultra-faint dwarfs should reveal j within 5 × 103-104 kpc km s-1. This is a promising method to significantly constrain the cosmologically expected mass range for the MW and eventually M31 as more satellite PMs become available.",
keywords = "galaxies: evolution, galaxies: fundamental parameters, galaxies: kinematics and dynamics, Local Group",
author = "Ekta Patel and Gurtina Besla and Kaisey Mandel and Sohn, {Sangmo Tony}",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "20",
doi = "10.3847/1538-4357/aab78f",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "857",
journal = "Astrophysical Journal",
issn = "0004-637X",
publisher = "IOP Publishing Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Estimating the Mass of the Milky Way Using the Ensemble of Classical Satellite Galaxies

AU - Patel, Ekta

AU - Besla, Gurtina

AU - Mandel, Kaisey

AU - Sohn, Sangmo Tony

PY - 2018/4/20

Y1 - 2018/4/20

N2 - High precision proper motion (PM) measurements are available for approximately 20% of all known dwarf satellite galaxies of the Milky Way (MW). Here we extend the Bayesian framework of Patel et al. to include all MW satellites with measured 6D phase-space information and apply it with the Illustris-Dark simulation to constrain the MW's mass. Using the properties of each MW satellite individually, we find that the scatter among mass estimates is reduced when the magnitude of specific orbital angular momentum (j) is adopted, rather than their combined instantaneous positions and velocities. We also find that high j satellites (i.e., Leo II) constrain the upper limits for the MW's mass and low j satellites, rather than the highest speed satellites (i.e., Leo I and Large Magellanic Cloud), set the lower mass limits. When j of all classical satellites is used to simultaneously estimate the MW's mass, we conclude the halo mass is 0.85+0.23 -0.26 × 1012M⊙ (including Sagittarius dSph) and 0.96+0.29 -0.28 × 1012 M⊙ (excluding Sagittarius dSph), cautioning that low j satellites on decaying orbits like Sagittarius dSph may bias the distribution. These estimates markedly reduce the current factor of two spread in the mass range of the MW. We also find a well-defined relationship between host halo mass and satellite j distribution, which yields the prediction that upcoming PMs for ultra-faint dwarfs should reveal j within 5 × 103-104 kpc km s-1. This is a promising method to significantly constrain the cosmologically expected mass range for the MW and eventually M31 as more satellite PMs become available.

AB - High precision proper motion (PM) measurements are available for approximately 20% of all known dwarf satellite galaxies of the Milky Way (MW). Here we extend the Bayesian framework of Patel et al. to include all MW satellites with measured 6D phase-space information and apply it with the Illustris-Dark simulation to constrain the MW's mass. Using the properties of each MW satellite individually, we find that the scatter among mass estimates is reduced when the magnitude of specific orbital angular momentum (j) is adopted, rather than their combined instantaneous positions and velocities. We also find that high j satellites (i.e., Leo II) constrain the upper limits for the MW's mass and low j satellites, rather than the highest speed satellites (i.e., Leo I and Large Magellanic Cloud), set the lower mass limits. When j of all classical satellites is used to simultaneously estimate the MW's mass, we conclude the halo mass is 0.85+0.23 -0.26 × 1012M⊙ (including Sagittarius dSph) and 0.96+0.29 -0.28 × 1012 M⊙ (excluding Sagittarius dSph), cautioning that low j satellites on decaying orbits like Sagittarius dSph may bias the distribution. These estimates markedly reduce the current factor of two spread in the mass range of the MW. We also find a well-defined relationship between host halo mass and satellite j distribution, which yields the prediction that upcoming PMs for ultra-faint dwarfs should reveal j within 5 × 103-104 kpc km s-1. This is a promising method to significantly constrain the cosmologically expected mass range for the MW and eventually M31 as more satellite PMs become available.

KW - galaxies: evolution

KW - galaxies: fundamental parameters

KW - galaxies: kinematics and dynamics

KW - Local Group

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046371490&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046371490&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3847/1538-4357/aab78f

DO - 10.3847/1538-4357/aab78f

M3 - Article

VL - 857

JO - Astrophysical Journal

JF - Astrophysical Journal

SN - 0004-637X

IS - 2

M1 - 78

ER -