Estimating the Prevalence of Gender-Biased Language in Undergraduates’ Everyday Speech

Heather J. MacArthur, Jessica L. Cundiff, Matthias R Mehl

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Research has shown that language can be gender-biased; however, little research has investigated the prevalence of this bias in everyday speech. Using recordings sampled from undergraduates’ daily conversations, we investigated two forms of gender bias: paternalism through use of the infantilizing label girl to refer to women and androcentrism through a tendency to use more masculine (e.g., man, guy) than feminine (e.g., girl, woman) labels in everyday speech. U.S. participants (n = 175) wore the Electronically Activated Recorder (EAR), a device that recorded sound samples from their environments for 30 s every 12.5 min, for up to 4 days. Verbatim transcripts were then analyzed for instances of commonly used labels for females and males (e.g., girl, woman, boy, man). Results indicated that the label girl surpassed all other labels for women, as well as boy labels for men. We also found evidence of a masculine-label bias: Participants used masculine labels more frequently than feminine labels overall. These findings indicate the need for future research to investigate the potential consequences of infantilizing and androcentric language as well as the need for teachers, professors, clinicians, and practitioners of all types to be mindful of how their speech may include, exclude, or infantilize people based on gender.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalSex Roles
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Language
gender
language
androcentrism
trend
paternalism
recording
conversation
university teacher
Paternalism
Sexism
teacher
Research
evidence
Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • Androcentrism
  • Gender
  • Gender inequality
  • Gender studies
  • Gender-fair language
  • Language & languages
  • Male bias
  • Masculinity
  • Non-sexist language
  • Sexism in language

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gender Studies
  • Social Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Estimating the Prevalence of Gender-Biased Language in Undergraduates’ Everyday Speech. / MacArthur, Heather J.; Cundiff, Jessica L.; Mehl, Matthias R.

In: Sex Roles, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{205da8fa147f41ddbfe15c7102c3c0dd,
title = "Estimating the Prevalence of Gender-Biased Language in Undergraduates’ Everyday Speech",
abstract = "Research has shown that language can be gender-biased; however, little research has investigated the prevalence of this bias in everyday speech. Using recordings sampled from undergraduates’ daily conversations, we investigated two forms of gender bias: paternalism through use of the infantilizing label girl to refer to women and androcentrism through a tendency to use more masculine (e.g., man, guy) than feminine (e.g., girl, woman) labels in everyday speech. U.S. participants (n = 175) wore the Electronically Activated Recorder (EAR), a device that recorded sound samples from their environments for 30 s every 12.5 min, for up to 4 days. Verbatim transcripts were then analyzed for instances of commonly used labels for females and males (e.g., girl, woman, boy, man). Results indicated that the label girl surpassed all other labels for women, as well as boy labels for men. We also found evidence of a masculine-label bias: Participants used masculine labels more frequently than feminine labels overall. These findings indicate the need for future research to investigate the potential consequences of infantilizing and androcentric language as well as the need for teachers, professors, clinicians, and practitioners of all types to be mindful of how their speech may include, exclude, or infantilize people based on gender.",
keywords = "Androcentrism, Gender, Gender inequality, Gender studies, Gender-fair language, Language & languages, Male bias, Masculinity, Non-sexist language, Sexism in language",
author = "MacArthur, {Heather J.} and Cundiff, {Jessica L.} and Mehl, {Matthias R}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11199-019-01033-z",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Sex Roles: A Journal of Research",
issn = "0360-0025",
publisher = "Springer New York",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Estimating the Prevalence of Gender-Biased Language in Undergraduates’ Everyday Speech

AU - MacArthur, Heather J.

AU - Cundiff, Jessica L.

AU - Mehl, Matthias R

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Research has shown that language can be gender-biased; however, little research has investigated the prevalence of this bias in everyday speech. Using recordings sampled from undergraduates’ daily conversations, we investigated two forms of gender bias: paternalism through use of the infantilizing label girl to refer to women and androcentrism through a tendency to use more masculine (e.g., man, guy) than feminine (e.g., girl, woman) labels in everyday speech. U.S. participants (n = 175) wore the Electronically Activated Recorder (EAR), a device that recorded sound samples from their environments for 30 s every 12.5 min, for up to 4 days. Verbatim transcripts were then analyzed for instances of commonly used labels for females and males (e.g., girl, woman, boy, man). Results indicated that the label girl surpassed all other labels for women, as well as boy labels for men. We also found evidence of a masculine-label bias: Participants used masculine labels more frequently than feminine labels overall. These findings indicate the need for future research to investigate the potential consequences of infantilizing and androcentric language as well as the need for teachers, professors, clinicians, and practitioners of all types to be mindful of how their speech may include, exclude, or infantilize people based on gender.

AB - Research has shown that language can be gender-biased; however, little research has investigated the prevalence of this bias in everyday speech. Using recordings sampled from undergraduates’ daily conversations, we investigated two forms of gender bias: paternalism through use of the infantilizing label girl to refer to women and androcentrism through a tendency to use more masculine (e.g., man, guy) than feminine (e.g., girl, woman) labels in everyday speech. U.S. participants (n = 175) wore the Electronically Activated Recorder (EAR), a device that recorded sound samples from their environments for 30 s every 12.5 min, for up to 4 days. Verbatim transcripts were then analyzed for instances of commonly used labels for females and males (e.g., girl, woman, boy, man). Results indicated that the label girl surpassed all other labels for women, as well as boy labels for men. We also found evidence of a masculine-label bias: Participants used masculine labels more frequently than feminine labels overall. These findings indicate the need for future research to investigate the potential consequences of infantilizing and androcentric language as well as the need for teachers, professors, clinicians, and practitioners of all types to be mindful of how their speech may include, exclude, or infantilize people based on gender.

KW - Androcentrism

KW - Gender

KW - Gender inequality

KW - Gender studies

KW - Gender-fair language

KW - Language & languages

KW - Male bias

KW - Masculinity

KW - Non-sexist language

KW - Sexism in language

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063258348&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85063258348&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11199-019-01033-z

DO - 10.1007/s11199-019-01033-z

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85063258348

JO - Sex Roles: A Journal of Research

JF - Sex Roles: A Journal of Research

SN - 0360-0025

ER -