Ethical Implications of the Electronic Health Record: In the Service of the Patient

American College of Physicians Ethics, Professionalism and Human Rights Committee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Electronic health records (EHRs) provide benefits for patients, physicians, and clinical teams, but also raise ethical questions. Navigating how to provide care in the digital age requires an assessment of the impact of the EHR on patient care and the patient–physician relationship. EHRs should facilitate patient care and, as an essential component of that care, support the patient–physician relationship. Billing, regulatory, research, documentation, and administrative functions determined by the operational requirements of health care systems, payers, and others have resulted in EHRs that are better able to satisfy such external functions than to ensure that patient care needs are met. The profession has a responsibility to identify and address this mismatch. This position paper by the American College of Physicians (ACP) Ethics, Professionalism and Human Rights Committee does not address EHR design, user variability, meaningful use, or coding requirements and other government and payer mandates per se; these issues are discussed in detail in ACP’s Clinical Documentation policy. This paper focuses on EHRs and the patient–physician relationship and patient care; patient autonomy, privacy and confidentiality; and professionalism, clinical reasoning and training. It explores emerging ethical challenges and concerns for and raised by physicians across the professional lifespan, whose ongoing input is crucial to the development and use of information technology that truly serves patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)935-939
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of General Internal Medicine
Volume32
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Electronic Health Records
Patient Care
Physicians
Documentation
Privacy
Confidentiality
Ethics
Technology
Delivery of Health Care
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

American College of Physicians Ethics, Professionalism and Human Rights Committee (2017). Ethical Implications of the Electronic Health Record: In the Service of the Patient. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 32(8), 935-939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-017-4030-1

Ethical Implications of the Electronic Health Record : In the Service of the Patient. / American College of Physicians Ethics, Professionalism and Human Rights Committee.

In: Journal of General Internal Medicine, Vol. 32, No. 8, 01.08.2017, p. 935-939.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

American College of Physicians Ethics, Professionalism and Human Rights Committee 2017, 'Ethical Implications of the Electronic Health Record: In the Service of the Patient', Journal of General Internal Medicine, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 935-939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-017-4030-1
American College of Physicians Ethics, Professionalism and Human Rights Committee. Ethical Implications of the Electronic Health Record: In the Service of the Patient. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2017 Aug 1;32(8):935-939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-017-4030-1
American College of Physicians Ethics, Professionalism and Human Rights Committee. / Ethical Implications of the Electronic Health Record : In the Service of the Patient. In: Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2017 ; Vol. 32, No. 8. pp. 935-939.
@article{48282f3b5fb942a7a01abc091b493ac6,
title = "Ethical Implications of the Electronic Health Record: In the Service of the Patient",
abstract = "Electronic health records (EHRs) provide benefits for patients, physicians, and clinical teams, but also raise ethical questions. Navigating how to provide care in the digital age requires an assessment of the impact of the EHR on patient care and the patient–physician relationship. EHRs should facilitate patient care and, as an essential component of that care, support the patient–physician relationship. Billing, regulatory, research, documentation, and administrative functions determined by the operational requirements of health care systems, payers, and others have resulted in EHRs that are better able to satisfy such external functions than to ensure that patient care needs are met. The profession has a responsibility to identify and address this mismatch. This position paper by the American College of Physicians (ACP) Ethics, Professionalism and Human Rights Committee does not address EHR design, user variability, meaningful use, or coding requirements and other government and payer mandates per se; these issues are discussed in detail in ACP’s Clinical Documentation policy. This paper focuses on EHRs and the patient–physician relationship and patient care; patient autonomy, privacy and confidentiality; and professionalism, clinical reasoning and training. It explores emerging ethical challenges and concerns for and raised by physicians across the professional lifespan, whose ongoing input is crucial to the development and use of information technology that truly serves patients.",
author = "{American College of Physicians Ethics, Professionalism and Human Rights Committee} and Sulmasy, {Lois Snyder} and Lopez, {Ana Maria} and Horwitch, {Carrie A.}",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11606-017-4030-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "935--939",
journal = "Journal of General Internal Medicine",
issn = "0884-8734",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ethical Implications of the Electronic Health Record

T2 - In the Service of the Patient

AU - American College of Physicians Ethics, Professionalism and Human Rights Committee

AU - Sulmasy, Lois Snyder

AU - Lopez, Ana Maria

AU - Horwitch, Carrie A.

PY - 2017/8/1

Y1 - 2017/8/1

N2 - Electronic health records (EHRs) provide benefits for patients, physicians, and clinical teams, but also raise ethical questions. Navigating how to provide care in the digital age requires an assessment of the impact of the EHR on patient care and the patient–physician relationship. EHRs should facilitate patient care and, as an essential component of that care, support the patient–physician relationship. Billing, regulatory, research, documentation, and administrative functions determined by the operational requirements of health care systems, payers, and others have resulted in EHRs that are better able to satisfy such external functions than to ensure that patient care needs are met. The profession has a responsibility to identify and address this mismatch. This position paper by the American College of Physicians (ACP) Ethics, Professionalism and Human Rights Committee does not address EHR design, user variability, meaningful use, or coding requirements and other government and payer mandates per se; these issues are discussed in detail in ACP’s Clinical Documentation policy. This paper focuses on EHRs and the patient–physician relationship and patient care; patient autonomy, privacy and confidentiality; and professionalism, clinical reasoning and training. It explores emerging ethical challenges and concerns for and raised by physicians across the professional lifespan, whose ongoing input is crucial to the development and use of information technology that truly serves patients.

AB - Electronic health records (EHRs) provide benefits for patients, physicians, and clinical teams, but also raise ethical questions. Navigating how to provide care in the digital age requires an assessment of the impact of the EHR on patient care and the patient–physician relationship. EHRs should facilitate patient care and, as an essential component of that care, support the patient–physician relationship. Billing, regulatory, research, documentation, and administrative functions determined by the operational requirements of health care systems, payers, and others have resulted in EHRs that are better able to satisfy such external functions than to ensure that patient care needs are met. The profession has a responsibility to identify and address this mismatch. This position paper by the American College of Physicians (ACP) Ethics, Professionalism and Human Rights Committee does not address EHR design, user variability, meaningful use, or coding requirements and other government and payer mandates per se; these issues are discussed in detail in ACP’s Clinical Documentation policy. This paper focuses on EHRs and the patient–physician relationship and patient care; patient autonomy, privacy and confidentiality; and professionalism, clinical reasoning and training. It explores emerging ethical challenges and concerns for and raised by physicians across the professional lifespan, whose ongoing input is crucial to the development and use of information technology that truly serves patients.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85015616318&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85015616318&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11606-017-4030-1

DO - 10.1007/s11606-017-4030-1

M3 - Article

C2 - 28321550

AN - SCOPUS:85015616318

VL - 32

SP - 935

EP - 939

JO - Journal of General Internal Medicine

JF - Journal of General Internal Medicine

SN - 0884-8734

IS - 8

ER -