Ethnic and geographic differences in mammographic density and their association with breast cancer incidence

Gertraud Maskarinec, Ian Pagano, Zhao Chen, Chisato Nagata, Inger Torhild Gram

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

72 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The objective of this pooled analysis was to compare differences in dense areas and percent mammographic densities to breast cancer incidence in populations at different breast cancer risk. The data set included 1,327 women aged 40-80: Caucasians from Norway, Arizona, and Hawaii, Japanese from Hawaii and Japan, Latina from Arizona, and Native Hawaiians from Hawaii. One reader performed computer-assisted quantitative density assessment for all mammographic films. Multiple linear regression models evaluated the influence of the covariates on breast density. Spearman correlation coefficients (r s) estimated the association between breast density and breast cancer incidence for the seven populations. After adjustment for covariates, ethnicity, but not location, was significantly associated with breast density. In the full model, 19% of the variation in the dense areas and 46% in the variation of percent densities were explained by measured risk factors. Native Hawaiians had the largest dense areas and women in Japan the smallest, whereas percent densities were highest among Native Hawaiians and Japanese in Hawaii and lowest among Norwegian women. The mean age-adjusted dense area had the strongest association with breast cancer incidence (r s = 0.93, P = 0.003); the relation with percent density was considerably weaker (r s = 0.32, P = 0.48). The correlation between age-adjusted dense area and breast cancer incidence remained strong after selectively removing individual data points. This comparison of mammographic densities suggests that, on a group level, age-adjusted dense areas may reflect breast cancer incidence better than percent densities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)47-56
Number of pages10
JournalBreast Cancer Research and Treatment
Volume104
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2007

Fingerprint

Oceanic Ancestry Group
Breast Neoplasms
Incidence
Linear Models
Japan
Norway
Hispanic Americans
Population
Breast Density
Age Groups

Keywords

  • Breast cancer incidence
  • Breast density
  • Ethnicity
  • Risk factors

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Cite this

Ethnic and geographic differences in mammographic density and their association with breast cancer incidence. / Maskarinec, Gertraud; Pagano, Ian; Chen, Zhao; Nagata, Chisato; Gram, Inger Torhild.

In: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, Vol. 104, No. 1, 07.2007, p. 47-56.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Maskarinec, Gertraud ; Pagano, Ian ; Chen, Zhao ; Nagata, Chisato ; Gram, Inger Torhild. / Ethnic and geographic differences in mammographic density and their association with breast cancer incidence. In: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. 2007 ; Vol. 104, No. 1. pp. 47-56.
@article{1f9af5cbdf3343f580dd746c8a1b6b31,
title = "Ethnic and geographic differences in mammographic density and their association with breast cancer incidence",
abstract = "The objective of this pooled analysis was to compare differences in dense areas and percent mammographic densities to breast cancer incidence in populations at different breast cancer risk. The data set included 1,327 women aged 40-80: Caucasians from Norway, Arizona, and Hawaii, Japanese from Hawaii and Japan, Latina from Arizona, and Native Hawaiians from Hawaii. One reader performed computer-assisted quantitative density assessment for all mammographic films. Multiple linear regression models evaluated the influence of the covariates on breast density. Spearman correlation coefficients (r s) estimated the association between breast density and breast cancer incidence for the seven populations. After adjustment for covariates, ethnicity, but not location, was significantly associated with breast density. In the full model, 19{\%} of the variation in the dense areas and 46{\%} in the variation of percent densities were explained by measured risk factors. Native Hawaiians had the largest dense areas and women in Japan the smallest, whereas percent densities were highest among Native Hawaiians and Japanese in Hawaii and lowest among Norwegian women. The mean age-adjusted dense area had the strongest association with breast cancer incidence (r s = 0.93, P = 0.003); the relation with percent density was considerably weaker (r s = 0.32, P = 0.48). The correlation between age-adjusted dense area and breast cancer incidence remained strong after selectively removing individual data points. This comparison of mammographic densities suggests that, on a group level, age-adjusted dense areas may reflect breast cancer incidence better than percent densities.",
keywords = "Breast cancer incidence, Breast density, Ethnicity, Risk factors",
author = "Gertraud Maskarinec and Ian Pagano and Zhao Chen and Chisato Nagata and Gram, {Inger Torhild}",
year = "2007",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1007/s10549-006-9387-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "104",
pages = "47--56",
journal = "Breast Cancer Research and Treatment",
issn = "0167-6806",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ethnic and geographic differences in mammographic density and their association with breast cancer incidence

AU - Maskarinec, Gertraud

AU - Pagano, Ian

AU - Chen, Zhao

AU - Nagata, Chisato

AU - Gram, Inger Torhild

PY - 2007/7

Y1 - 2007/7

N2 - The objective of this pooled analysis was to compare differences in dense areas and percent mammographic densities to breast cancer incidence in populations at different breast cancer risk. The data set included 1,327 women aged 40-80: Caucasians from Norway, Arizona, and Hawaii, Japanese from Hawaii and Japan, Latina from Arizona, and Native Hawaiians from Hawaii. One reader performed computer-assisted quantitative density assessment for all mammographic films. Multiple linear regression models evaluated the influence of the covariates on breast density. Spearman correlation coefficients (r s) estimated the association between breast density and breast cancer incidence for the seven populations. After adjustment for covariates, ethnicity, but not location, was significantly associated with breast density. In the full model, 19% of the variation in the dense areas and 46% in the variation of percent densities were explained by measured risk factors. Native Hawaiians had the largest dense areas and women in Japan the smallest, whereas percent densities were highest among Native Hawaiians and Japanese in Hawaii and lowest among Norwegian women. The mean age-adjusted dense area had the strongest association with breast cancer incidence (r s = 0.93, P = 0.003); the relation with percent density was considerably weaker (r s = 0.32, P = 0.48). The correlation between age-adjusted dense area and breast cancer incidence remained strong after selectively removing individual data points. This comparison of mammographic densities suggests that, on a group level, age-adjusted dense areas may reflect breast cancer incidence better than percent densities.

AB - The objective of this pooled analysis was to compare differences in dense areas and percent mammographic densities to breast cancer incidence in populations at different breast cancer risk. The data set included 1,327 women aged 40-80: Caucasians from Norway, Arizona, and Hawaii, Japanese from Hawaii and Japan, Latina from Arizona, and Native Hawaiians from Hawaii. One reader performed computer-assisted quantitative density assessment for all mammographic films. Multiple linear regression models evaluated the influence of the covariates on breast density. Spearman correlation coefficients (r s) estimated the association between breast density and breast cancer incidence for the seven populations. After adjustment for covariates, ethnicity, but not location, was significantly associated with breast density. In the full model, 19% of the variation in the dense areas and 46% in the variation of percent densities were explained by measured risk factors. Native Hawaiians had the largest dense areas and women in Japan the smallest, whereas percent densities were highest among Native Hawaiians and Japanese in Hawaii and lowest among Norwegian women. The mean age-adjusted dense area had the strongest association with breast cancer incidence (r s = 0.93, P = 0.003); the relation with percent density was considerably weaker (r s = 0.32, P = 0.48). The correlation between age-adjusted dense area and breast cancer incidence remained strong after selectively removing individual data points. This comparison of mammographic densities suggests that, on a group level, age-adjusted dense areas may reflect breast cancer incidence better than percent densities.

KW - Breast cancer incidence

KW - Breast density

KW - Ethnicity

KW - Risk factors

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34250827939&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34250827939&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10549-006-9387-5

DO - 10.1007/s10549-006-9387-5

M3 - Article

C2 - 17009106

AN - SCOPUS:34250827939

VL - 104

SP - 47

EP - 56

JO - Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

JF - Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

SN - 0167-6806

IS - 1

ER -