Ethnic differences in femur geometry in the women's health initiative observational study

D. A. Nelson, T. J. Beck, G. Wu, C. E. Lewis, Tamsen L Bassford, J. A. Cauley, M. S. Leboff, Scott B Going, Zhao Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Participants in the observational study of the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) were studied to determine if ethnic differences in femur geometry can help to explain differences in hip fracture rates. Structural differences in femurs of African and Mexican-American women appear to be consistent with lower rates of hip fractures vs. whites. Introduction: Ethnic origin has a major influence on hip fractures, but the underlying etiology is unknown. We evaluated ethnic differences in hip fracture rates among 159,579 postmenopausal participants in the WHI then compared femur bone mineral density (BMD) and geometry among a subset with dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans of the hip and total body. Methods: The subset included 8,206 non-Hispanic whites, 1,476 African-American (AA), 704 Mexican-American (MA), and 130 Native Americans (NA). Femur geometry derived from hip DXA using hip-structure analysis (HSA) in whites was compared to minority groups after adjustment for age, height, weight, percent lean mass, neck-shaft angle and neck length, hormone use, chronic disease (e.g., diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, cancer), bone active medications (e.g., corticosteroids, osteoporosis therapies), and clinical center. Results: Both AA and MA women suffered hip fractures at half the rate of whites while NA appeared to be similar to whites. The structural advantage among AA appears to be due to a slightly narrower femur that requires more bone tissue to achieve similar or lower section moduli (SM) vs. whites. This also underlies their higher BMD (reduces region area) and lower buckling ratios (buckling susceptibility). Both MA and NA women had similar advantages vs. whites at the intertrochanter region where cross-sectional area and SM were higher but with no differences at the neck. NA and MA had smaller bending moments vs. whites acting in a fall on the hip (not significant in small NA sample). Buckling ratios of MA did not differ from whites at any region although NA had 4% lower values at the IT region. Conclusion: Differences in the geometry at the proximal femur are consistent with the lower hip fracture rates among AA and MA women compared to whites.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1377-1388
Number of pages12
JournalOsteoporosis International
Volume22
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2011

Fingerprint

Women's Health
Femur
Observational Studies
North American Indians
Hip Fractures
African Americans
Hip
Neck
Photon Absorptiometry
Bone Density
Bone Neoplasms
Minority Groups
Osteoporosis
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Adrenal Cortex Hormones
Chronic Disease
Hormones
Weights and Measures
Bone and Bones

Keywords

  • African American
  • Cross-sectional geometry
  • Ethnic differences
  • Hip structure analysis
  • Local buckling
  • Mexican American
  • Native American
  • Proximal femur

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

Cite this

Ethnic differences in femur geometry in the women's health initiative observational study. / Nelson, D. A.; Beck, T. J.; Wu, G.; Lewis, C. E.; Bassford, Tamsen L; Cauley, J. A.; Leboff, M. S.; Going, Scott B; Chen, Zhao.

In: Osteoporosis International, Vol. 22, No. 5, 05.2011, p. 1377-1388.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nelson, D. A. ; Beck, T. J. ; Wu, G. ; Lewis, C. E. ; Bassford, Tamsen L ; Cauley, J. A. ; Leboff, M. S. ; Going, Scott B ; Chen, Zhao. / Ethnic differences in femur geometry in the women's health initiative observational study. In: Osteoporosis International. 2011 ; Vol. 22, No. 5. pp. 1377-1388.
@article{efd45c6cce784a1ead0a03fe9a06bb01,
title = "Ethnic differences in femur geometry in the women's health initiative observational study",
abstract = "Participants in the observational study of the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) were studied to determine if ethnic differences in femur geometry can help to explain differences in hip fracture rates. Structural differences in femurs of African and Mexican-American women appear to be consistent with lower rates of hip fractures vs. whites. Introduction: Ethnic origin has a major influence on hip fractures, but the underlying etiology is unknown. We evaluated ethnic differences in hip fracture rates among 159,579 postmenopausal participants in the WHI then compared femur bone mineral density (BMD) and geometry among a subset with dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans of the hip and total body. Methods: The subset included 8,206 non-Hispanic whites, 1,476 African-American (AA), 704 Mexican-American (MA), and 130 Native Americans (NA). Femur geometry derived from hip DXA using hip-structure analysis (HSA) in whites was compared to minority groups after adjustment for age, height, weight, percent lean mass, neck-shaft angle and neck length, hormone use, chronic disease (e.g., diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, cancer), bone active medications (e.g., corticosteroids, osteoporosis therapies), and clinical center. Results: Both AA and MA women suffered hip fractures at half the rate of whites while NA appeared to be similar to whites. The structural advantage among AA appears to be due to a slightly narrower femur that requires more bone tissue to achieve similar or lower section moduli (SM) vs. whites. This also underlies their higher BMD (reduces region area) and lower buckling ratios (buckling susceptibility). Both MA and NA women had similar advantages vs. whites at the intertrochanter region where cross-sectional area and SM were higher but with no differences at the neck. NA and MA had smaller bending moments vs. whites acting in a fall on the hip (not significant in small NA sample). Buckling ratios of MA did not differ from whites at any region although NA had 4{\%} lower values at the IT region. Conclusion: Differences in the geometry at the proximal femur are consistent with the lower hip fracture rates among AA and MA women compared to whites.",
keywords = "African American, Cross-sectional geometry, Ethnic differences, Hip structure analysis, Local buckling, Mexican American, Native American, Proximal femur",
author = "Nelson, {D. A.} and Beck, {T. J.} and G. Wu and Lewis, {C. E.} and Bassford, {Tamsen L} and Cauley, {J. A.} and Leboff, {M. S.} and Going, {Scott B} and Zhao Chen",
year = "2011",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1007/s00198-010-1349-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "1377--1388",
journal = "Osteoporosis International",
issn = "0937-941X",
publisher = "Springer London",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ethnic differences in femur geometry in the women's health initiative observational study

AU - Nelson, D. A.

AU - Beck, T. J.

AU - Wu, G.

AU - Lewis, C. E.

AU - Bassford, Tamsen L

AU - Cauley, J. A.

AU - Leboff, M. S.

AU - Going, Scott B

AU - Chen, Zhao

PY - 2011/5

Y1 - 2011/5

N2 - Participants in the observational study of the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) were studied to determine if ethnic differences in femur geometry can help to explain differences in hip fracture rates. Structural differences in femurs of African and Mexican-American women appear to be consistent with lower rates of hip fractures vs. whites. Introduction: Ethnic origin has a major influence on hip fractures, but the underlying etiology is unknown. We evaluated ethnic differences in hip fracture rates among 159,579 postmenopausal participants in the WHI then compared femur bone mineral density (BMD) and geometry among a subset with dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans of the hip and total body. Methods: The subset included 8,206 non-Hispanic whites, 1,476 African-American (AA), 704 Mexican-American (MA), and 130 Native Americans (NA). Femur geometry derived from hip DXA using hip-structure analysis (HSA) in whites was compared to minority groups after adjustment for age, height, weight, percent lean mass, neck-shaft angle and neck length, hormone use, chronic disease (e.g., diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, cancer), bone active medications (e.g., corticosteroids, osteoporosis therapies), and clinical center. Results: Both AA and MA women suffered hip fractures at half the rate of whites while NA appeared to be similar to whites. The structural advantage among AA appears to be due to a slightly narrower femur that requires more bone tissue to achieve similar or lower section moduli (SM) vs. whites. This also underlies their higher BMD (reduces region area) and lower buckling ratios (buckling susceptibility). Both MA and NA women had similar advantages vs. whites at the intertrochanter region where cross-sectional area and SM were higher but with no differences at the neck. NA and MA had smaller bending moments vs. whites acting in a fall on the hip (not significant in small NA sample). Buckling ratios of MA did not differ from whites at any region although NA had 4% lower values at the IT region. Conclusion: Differences in the geometry at the proximal femur are consistent with the lower hip fracture rates among AA and MA women compared to whites.

AB - Participants in the observational study of the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) were studied to determine if ethnic differences in femur geometry can help to explain differences in hip fracture rates. Structural differences in femurs of African and Mexican-American women appear to be consistent with lower rates of hip fractures vs. whites. Introduction: Ethnic origin has a major influence on hip fractures, but the underlying etiology is unknown. We evaluated ethnic differences in hip fracture rates among 159,579 postmenopausal participants in the WHI then compared femur bone mineral density (BMD) and geometry among a subset with dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans of the hip and total body. Methods: The subset included 8,206 non-Hispanic whites, 1,476 African-American (AA), 704 Mexican-American (MA), and 130 Native Americans (NA). Femur geometry derived from hip DXA using hip-structure analysis (HSA) in whites was compared to minority groups after adjustment for age, height, weight, percent lean mass, neck-shaft angle and neck length, hormone use, chronic disease (e.g., diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, cancer), bone active medications (e.g., corticosteroids, osteoporosis therapies), and clinical center. Results: Both AA and MA women suffered hip fractures at half the rate of whites while NA appeared to be similar to whites. The structural advantage among AA appears to be due to a slightly narrower femur that requires more bone tissue to achieve similar or lower section moduli (SM) vs. whites. This also underlies their higher BMD (reduces region area) and lower buckling ratios (buckling susceptibility). Both MA and NA women had similar advantages vs. whites at the intertrochanter region where cross-sectional area and SM were higher but with no differences at the neck. NA and MA had smaller bending moments vs. whites acting in a fall on the hip (not significant in small NA sample). Buckling ratios of MA did not differ from whites at any region although NA had 4% lower values at the IT region. Conclusion: Differences in the geometry at the proximal femur are consistent with the lower hip fracture rates among AA and MA women compared to whites.

KW - African American

KW - Cross-sectional geometry

KW - Ethnic differences

KW - Hip structure analysis

KW - Local buckling

KW - Mexican American

KW - Native American

KW - Proximal femur

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79955464852&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79955464852&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00198-010-1349-4

DO - 10.1007/s00198-010-1349-4

M3 - Article

C2 - 20737265

AN - SCOPUS:79955464852

VL - 22

SP - 1377

EP - 1388

JO - Osteoporosis International

JF - Osteoporosis International

SN - 0937-941X

IS - 5

ER -