Evaluating NCEP Eta Model-derived data against observations

Ismail Yucel, W. James Shuttleworth, James Washburne, Fei Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Data derived at the National Centers for Environmental Prediction via four-dimensional data assimilation using the Eta Model were evaluated against surface observations from two observational arrays, one located in the semihumid, continental climate of Oklahoma and Kansas and the second in the semiarid climate of southern Arizona. Comparison was made for the period of the Global Energy Water-cycle Experiment Continental-scale International Project's "GIST" dataset in 1994 and their "ESOP-95" dataset in 1995, and for the months of March and May in 1996. Coding errors in the Eta Model's postprocessor used to diagnose near-surface temperature and humidity are shown to have compromised the GIST and ESOP-95 near-surface data. A procedure was devised to correct the GIST and ESOP-95 near-surface fields by mimicking the corrected code used in the Eta Model since January 1996. Comparison with observations revealed that modeled surface solar radiation is significantly overestimated except in clear-sky conditions. This discrepancy in cloudy-sky solar radiation was altered little by the substantial January 1996 revisions to Eta Model physics, but the revisions are shown to have greatly improved the model's ability to capture daily and seasonal variations in near-surface air temperature, specific humidity, and wind speed. The poorly modeled surface radiation complicates evaluation of modeled surface energy fluxes, but comparison with observations suggests that the modeled daytime Bowen ratio may be systematically high. This study clearly demonstrates the strong sensitivity of model-calculated, near-surface variables to the physics used to describe surface interactions in the data assimilation model. To mitigate against this and to aid intercomparisons between other data, it is recommended that model-derived data always include sufficient information to allow potential users to recalculate the extrapolation to the surface using a user-defined model of surface-atmosphere exchanges.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1977-1991
Number of pages15
JournalMonthly Weather Review
Volume126
Issue number7
StatePublished - Jul 1998

Fingerprint

data assimilation
solar radiation
humidity
surface temperature
physics
Bowen ratio
clear sky
surface energy
energy flux
diurnal variation
seasonal variation
air temperature
wind velocity
atmosphere
climate
prediction
energy
comparison
experiment
water

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Atmospheric Science

Cite this

Evaluating NCEP Eta Model-derived data against observations. / Yucel, Ismail; Shuttleworth, W. James; Washburne, James; Chen, Fei.

In: Monthly Weather Review, Vol. 126, No. 7, 07.1998, p. 1977-1991.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c3127aa81d5b4358a3c8106cbb0e2d65,
title = "Evaluating NCEP Eta Model-derived data against observations",
abstract = "Data derived at the National Centers for Environmental Prediction via four-dimensional data assimilation using the Eta Model were evaluated against surface observations from two observational arrays, one located in the semihumid, continental climate of Oklahoma and Kansas and the second in the semiarid climate of southern Arizona. Comparison was made for the period of the Global Energy Water-cycle Experiment Continental-scale International Project's {"}GIST{"} dataset in 1994 and their {"}ESOP-95{"} dataset in 1995, and for the months of March and May in 1996. Coding errors in the Eta Model's postprocessor used to diagnose near-surface temperature and humidity are shown to have compromised the GIST and ESOP-95 near-surface data. A procedure was devised to correct the GIST and ESOP-95 near-surface fields by mimicking the corrected code used in the Eta Model since January 1996. Comparison with observations revealed that modeled surface solar radiation is significantly overestimated except in clear-sky conditions. This discrepancy in cloudy-sky solar radiation was altered little by the substantial January 1996 revisions to Eta Model physics, but the revisions are shown to have greatly improved the model's ability to capture daily and seasonal variations in near-surface air temperature, specific humidity, and wind speed. The poorly modeled surface radiation complicates evaluation of modeled surface energy fluxes, but comparison with observations suggests that the modeled daytime Bowen ratio may be systematically high. This study clearly demonstrates the strong sensitivity of model-calculated, near-surface variables to the physics used to describe surface interactions in the data assimilation model. To mitigate against this and to aid intercomparisons between other data, it is recommended that model-derived data always include sufficient information to allow potential users to recalculate the extrapolation to the surface using a user-defined model of surface-atmosphere exchanges.",
author = "Ismail Yucel and Shuttleworth, {W. James} and James Washburne and Fei Chen",
year = "1998",
month = "7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "126",
pages = "1977--1991",
journal = "Monthly Weather Review",
issn = "0027-0644",
publisher = "American Meteorological Society",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating NCEP Eta Model-derived data against observations

AU - Yucel, Ismail

AU - Shuttleworth, W. James

AU - Washburne, James

AU - Chen, Fei

PY - 1998/7

Y1 - 1998/7

N2 - Data derived at the National Centers for Environmental Prediction via four-dimensional data assimilation using the Eta Model were evaluated against surface observations from two observational arrays, one located in the semihumid, continental climate of Oklahoma and Kansas and the second in the semiarid climate of southern Arizona. Comparison was made for the period of the Global Energy Water-cycle Experiment Continental-scale International Project's "GIST" dataset in 1994 and their "ESOP-95" dataset in 1995, and for the months of March and May in 1996. Coding errors in the Eta Model's postprocessor used to diagnose near-surface temperature and humidity are shown to have compromised the GIST and ESOP-95 near-surface data. A procedure was devised to correct the GIST and ESOP-95 near-surface fields by mimicking the corrected code used in the Eta Model since January 1996. Comparison with observations revealed that modeled surface solar radiation is significantly overestimated except in clear-sky conditions. This discrepancy in cloudy-sky solar radiation was altered little by the substantial January 1996 revisions to Eta Model physics, but the revisions are shown to have greatly improved the model's ability to capture daily and seasonal variations in near-surface air temperature, specific humidity, and wind speed. The poorly modeled surface radiation complicates evaluation of modeled surface energy fluxes, but comparison with observations suggests that the modeled daytime Bowen ratio may be systematically high. This study clearly demonstrates the strong sensitivity of model-calculated, near-surface variables to the physics used to describe surface interactions in the data assimilation model. To mitigate against this and to aid intercomparisons between other data, it is recommended that model-derived data always include sufficient information to allow potential users to recalculate the extrapolation to the surface using a user-defined model of surface-atmosphere exchanges.

AB - Data derived at the National Centers for Environmental Prediction via four-dimensional data assimilation using the Eta Model were evaluated against surface observations from two observational arrays, one located in the semihumid, continental climate of Oklahoma and Kansas and the second in the semiarid climate of southern Arizona. Comparison was made for the period of the Global Energy Water-cycle Experiment Continental-scale International Project's "GIST" dataset in 1994 and their "ESOP-95" dataset in 1995, and for the months of March and May in 1996. Coding errors in the Eta Model's postprocessor used to diagnose near-surface temperature and humidity are shown to have compromised the GIST and ESOP-95 near-surface data. A procedure was devised to correct the GIST and ESOP-95 near-surface fields by mimicking the corrected code used in the Eta Model since January 1996. Comparison with observations revealed that modeled surface solar radiation is significantly overestimated except in clear-sky conditions. This discrepancy in cloudy-sky solar radiation was altered little by the substantial January 1996 revisions to Eta Model physics, but the revisions are shown to have greatly improved the model's ability to capture daily and seasonal variations in near-surface air temperature, specific humidity, and wind speed. The poorly modeled surface radiation complicates evaluation of modeled surface energy fluxes, but comparison with observations suggests that the modeled daytime Bowen ratio may be systematically high. This study clearly demonstrates the strong sensitivity of model-calculated, near-surface variables to the physics used to describe surface interactions in the data assimilation model. To mitigate against this and to aid intercomparisons between other data, it is recommended that model-derived data always include sufficient information to allow potential users to recalculate the extrapolation to the surface using a user-defined model of surface-atmosphere exchanges.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032439090&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032439090&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0032439090

VL - 126

SP - 1977

EP - 1991

JO - Monthly Weather Review

JF - Monthly Weather Review

SN - 0027-0644

IS - 7

ER -