Evaluating the relationship between quality measure adherence definitions and economic outcomes in commercial health plans: A retrospective diabetes cohort study

Chanadda Chinthammit, David R. Axon, Lea Mollon, Ann M. Taylor, Matthew Pickering, Heather Black, Terri Warholak, Patrick J. Campbell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diabetes is a prevalent chronic condition in the United States that results in considerable morbidity and mortality, frequent use of the health care system, and high health care expenditures. Adherence to antidiabetic medications can help improve health outcomes and lower health care utilization and expenditures. The Pharmacy Quality Alliance (PQA) Proportion of Days Covered (PDC): Diabetes All Class medication adherence measure was developed and endorsed to improve adherence to noninsulin antidiabetic medications; however, it has not been assessed in a commercial population of diabetes patients over a 1-year time frame. OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between adherence, as defined in the PQA medication adherence measures, and health care utilization and expenditure among commercially insured individuals using antidiabetic medications. METHODS: This 1-year retrospective study evaluated a cohort of individuals from IBM MarketScan Research Databases (2009-2015) with noninsulin antidiabetic medications. Eligible study subjects included adults (aged ≥18 years at index date) with continuous enrollment in their health plans for 6 months before (i.e., baseline period) and 12 months after (i.e., study period) the index date and ≥2 prescriptions dispensed for any medication included in the PQA PDC Diabetes All Class medication adherence measure, with at least 150 days between the first and last fill during the study period. The index date was defined as the first fill for a medication included in the PQA PDC Diabetes All Class adherence measure after a 180-day baseline period. Generalized linear models with log link and gamma distribution (expenditure) or negative binomial distribution (utilization) assessed relationships between adherence (≥80% PDC) and health care utilization and expenditure while adjusting for potential confounders. Cost ratios (CR) and rate ratios (RR) were computed using beta coefficients. Cohort characteristics were compared using t-tests, Wilcoxon rank sum tests, or chi-square tests with an alpha level of 0.001 set a priori. RESULTS: A total of 1,576,112 individuals were eligible; of these, 1,028,176 (65.2%) were adherent. Significant differences in demographic characteristics were observed between adherent and nonadherent groups (P<0.001). Multivariable analyses demonstrated that adherence was associated with the following: (a) 16.6% fewer inpatient (RR=0.834, 95% CI=0.819-0.850) and 3.6% more outpatient service visits (RR=1.036, 95% CI=1.032-1.039) and (b) 16.8% lower inpatient expenditures (CR=0.833, 95% CI=0.829-0.836); 2.6% lower outpatient expenditures (CR=0.974, 95% CI=0.970-0.978); 16.4% higher prescription drug expenditures (CR=1.164, 95% CI=1.159-1.169); and 4.2% lower total (CR=0.958, 95% CI=0.954-0.962) expenditures. Adherent subjects were associated with lower incremental per member per month expenditures for inpatient (−$31.74), outpatient (−$10.09), and total (−$30.82) expenditures, yet higher prescription drug expenditures ($25.60) compared with nonadherent subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to noninsulin antidiabetic medications was associated with more outpatient and fewer inpatient visits, as well as lower total expenditures compared with nonadherence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)64-72
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Managed Care and Specialty Pharmacy
Volume27
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2021

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmacy
  • Pharmaceutical Science
  • Health Policy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating the relationship between quality measure adherence definitions and economic outcomes in commercial health plans: A retrospective diabetes cohort study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this