Evaluation in OT

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The Occam's Razor evaluation metric of generative phonology drove analyses to their most general statement possible, and had far-reaching effects on representations as well as on rules. With the advent of Optimality Theory, which has no comparable evaluation metric, the question arises of whether generality is still prized in formal accounts of language. In this short work, I explore this question, coming to the conclusion that generality is still necessary for empirical reasons, regardless of its non-role in the evaluation of competing grammars.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)219-230
Number of pages12
JournalLinguistic Review
Volume17
Issue number2-4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2000

Fingerprint

evaluation
phonology
grammar
language
Evaluation
Generality
Grammar
Language
Optimality Theory
Generative Phonology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Evaluation in OT. / Archangeli, Diana B.

In: Linguistic Review, Vol. 17, No. 2-4, 2000, p. 219-230.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Archangeli, Diana B. / Evaluation in OT. In: Linguistic Review. 2000 ; Vol. 17, No. 2-4. pp. 219-230.
@article{ba8eb436917842a986f91d78329bc413,
title = "Evaluation in OT",
abstract = "The Occam's Razor evaluation metric of generative phonology drove analyses to their most general statement possible, and had far-reaching effects on representations as well as on rules. With the advent of Optimality Theory, which has no comparable evaluation metric, the question arises of whether generality is still prized in formal accounts of language. In this short work, I explore this question, coming to the conclusion that generality is still necessary for empirical reasons, regardless of its non-role in the evaluation of competing grammars.",
author = "Archangeli, {Diana B}",
year = "2000",
doi = "10.1515/tlir.2000.17.2-4.219",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "219--230",
journal = "Linguistic Review",
issn = "0167-6318",
publisher = "Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG",
number = "2-4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation in OT

AU - Archangeli, Diana B

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - The Occam's Razor evaluation metric of generative phonology drove analyses to their most general statement possible, and had far-reaching effects on representations as well as on rules. With the advent of Optimality Theory, which has no comparable evaluation metric, the question arises of whether generality is still prized in formal accounts of language. In this short work, I explore this question, coming to the conclusion that generality is still necessary for empirical reasons, regardless of its non-role in the evaluation of competing grammars.

AB - The Occam's Razor evaluation metric of generative phonology drove analyses to their most general statement possible, and had far-reaching effects on representations as well as on rules. With the advent of Optimality Theory, which has no comparable evaluation metric, the question arises of whether generality is still prized in formal accounts of language. In this short work, I explore this question, coming to the conclusion that generality is still necessary for empirical reasons, regardless of its non-role in the evaluation of competing grammars.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85026048066&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85026048066&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1515/tlir.2000.17.2-4.219

DO - 10.1515/tlir.2000.17.2-4.219

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85026048066

VL - 17

SP - 219

EP - 230

JO - Linguistic Review

JF - Linguistic Review

SN - 0167-6318

IS - 2-4

ER -