Abstract
In 1996 a single field experiment was conducted at Paloma Ranch, west of Gila Bend in Maricopa County Arizona. Nucoton 33B was dry planted and watered-up on 15 April. Treatments consisted of various rates and times of application of nitrogen (N) and calcium (Ca) from two sources (N-Cal TM and CAN TM-17), as well as a standard N source, UAN-32, along with a Ca check, which received no Ca. Treatments 1, 2, and 3 each received a total of 280 lbs. N/acre. Treatment 4 received a total of 210 lbs. N/acre while treatment 5 received a total of 301 lbs. N/acre. Treatment 1 was a standard for reference and received only applications of UAN-32. Treatments 2 and 4 each received a total of 72 lbs. of Ca/acre. Treatment 5 is the same as treatment 2 except that it received a total of 79 lbs. Ca/acre that included a 7 lbs. Ca/acre at water up. Treatment 3 received a total of 300 lbs. Ca/acre. No significant differences were found among the various treatments in terms of plant growth, soil water content, EC(e) values, and sodium absorption ratios. Lint yields were significantly different (P<0.07).
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Proceedings of the 1998 beltwide cotton conferences, San Diego, CA, USA, January 5-9 1999 |
| Publisher | National Cotton Council of America |
| Pages | 645-648 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| State | Published - 1998 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Materials Science(all)
Cite this
Evaluation of calcium soil conditioners in an irrigated cotton production system. / Griffin, J. R.; Silvertooth, Jeffrey; Norton, Elbert R.
Proceedings of the 1998 beltwide cotton conferences, San Diego, CA, USA, January 5-9 1999. National Cotton Council of America, 1998. p. 645-648.Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter
}
TY - CHAP
T1 - Evaluation of calcium soil conditioners in an irrigated cotton production system
AU - Griffin, J. R.
AU - Silvertooth, Jeffrey
AU - Norton, Elbert R
PY - 1998
Y1 - 1998
N2 - In 1996 a single field experiment was conducted at Paloma Ranch, west of Gila Bend in Maricopa County Arizona. Nucoton 33B was dry planted and watered-up on 15 April. Treatments consisted of various rates and times of application of nitrogen (N) and calcium (Ca) from two sources (N-Cal TM and CAN TM-17), as well as a standard N source, UAN-32, along with a Ca check, which received no Ca. Treatments 1, 2, and 3 each received a total of 280 lbs. N/acre. Treatment 4 received a total of 210 lbs. N/acre while treatment 5 received a total of 301 lbs. N/acre. Treatment 1 was a standard for reference and received only applications of UAN-32. Treatments 2 and 4 each received a total of 72 lbs. of Ca/acre. Treatment 5 is the same as treatment 2 except that it received a total of 79 lbs. Ca/acre that included a 7 lbs. Ca/acre at water up. Treatment 3 received a total of 300 lbs. Ca/acre. No significant differences were found among the various treatments in terms of plant growth, soil water content, EC(e) values, and sodium absorption ratios. Lint yields were significantly different (P<0.07).
AB - In 1996 a single field experiment was conducted at Paloma Ranch, west of Gila Bend in Maricopa County Arizona. Nucoton 33B was dry planted and watered-up on 15 April. Treatments consisted of various rates and times of application of nitrogen (N) and calcium (Ca) from two sources (N-Cal TM and CAN TM-17), as well as a standard N source, UAN-32, along with a Ca check, which received no Ca. Treatments 1, 2, and 3 each received a total of 280 lbs. N/acre. Treatment 4 received a total of 210 lbs. N/acre while treatment 5 received a total of 301 lbs. N/acre. Treatment 1 was a standard for reference and received only applications of UAN-32. Treatments 2 and 4 each received a total of 72 lbs. of Ca/acre. Treatment 5 is the same as treatment 2 except that it received a total of 79 lbs. Ca/acre that included a 7 lbs. Ca/acre at water up. Treatment 3 received a total of 300 lbs. Ca/acre. No significant differences were found among the various treatments in terms of plant growth, soil water content, EC(e) values, and sodium absorption ratios. Lint yields were significantly different (P<0.07).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032442465&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032442465&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Chapter
AN - SCOPUS:0032442465
SP - 645
EP - 648
BT - Proceedings of the 1998 beltwide cotton conferences, San Diego, CA, USA, January 5-9 1999
PB - National Cotton Council of America
ER -