Evaluation of e-prescribing in chain community pharmacy: Best-practice recommendations

Michael T. Rupp, Terri L Warholak

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

51 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To measure the attitudes and beliefs of community-based pharmacists and technicians toward electronic prescribing (e-prescribing) and the processing of e-prescriptions and to generate best-practice recommendations for changes to improve e-prescribing in the community setting. Design: Descriptive, nonexperimental, cross-sectional study. Setting: 422 chain community pharmacies in six states that met a minimum dispensing volume of five e-prescriptions per day. Data were collected between April and July 2006. Participants: Pharmacists, technicians, and student interns. Intervention: Receiving, processing, and dispensing of e-prescriptions assessed via self-administered survey and follow-up interviews of key pharmacy operations and information technology management in each participating chain pharmacy organization. Main outcome measures: Attitudes, beliefs, and satisfaction of pharmacy personnel regarding e-prescribing, compared with conventional prescribing, and recommendations for improving e-prescribing in the community practice setting. Results: 1,094 surveys were returned from pharmacy personnel practicing in 276 chain community pharmacies. Pharmacy personnel preferred e-prescriptions over conventional prescriptions on each of seven desired outcomes of care. Pharmacists were found to view e-prescribing more positively than technicians (P < 0.05) for its net effect on three key outcomes: patient safety, effectiveness of care, and efficiency of care. A total of 2,235 written comments were received on the returned surveys. Of these, 57% (1,277) mentioned negative features of e-prescribing, while 43% (958) noted positive features. Improved clarity and/or legibility of prescriptions was the most frequently cited advantage of e-prescribing, followed closely by improved speed or efficiency of processing. Prescribing errors were the most commonly cited negative feature of e-prescribing, particularly those stating a wrong drug or wrong directions. Conclusion: Pharmacy personnel were generally satisfied with the current status of e-prescribing, but they also perceive key weaknesses in how it has been implemented in physicians' practices and their own organizations. A total of 11 best-practice recommendations are offered to improve e-prescribing in the chain community pharmacy setting.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)364-370
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the American Pharmacists Association
Volume48
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2008

Fingerprint

Electronic Prescribing
Pharmacies
Practice Guidelines
Personnel
Prescriptions
Processing
Pharmacists
Information technology
Students
Organizations
Information Management
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Patient Safety
Cross-Sectional Studies

Keywords

  • Community pharmacy
  • E-prescribing
  • Practice guidelines

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmacy
  • Pharmacology
  • Pharmacology (nursing)
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Evaluation of e-prescribing in chain community pharmacy : Best-practice recommendations. / Rupp, Michael T.; Warholak, Terri L.

In: Journal of the American Pharmacists Association, Vol. 48, No. 3, 05.2008, p. 364-370.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9cc4604f6b8a418694ddc00676d2e53e,
title = "Evaluation of e-prescribing in chain community pharmacy: Best-practice recommendations",
abstract = "Objectives: To measure the attitudes and beliefs of community-based pharmacists and technicians toward electronic prescribing (e-prescribing) and the processing of e-prescriptions and to generate best-practice recommendations for changes to improve e-prescribing in the community setting. Design: Descriptive, nonexperimental, cross-sectional study. Setting: 422 chain community pharmacies in six states that met a minimum dispensing volume of five e-prescriptions per day. Data were collected between April and July 2006. Participants: Pharmacists, technicians, and student interns. Intervention: Receiving, processing, and dispensing of e-prescriptions assessed via self-administered survey and follow-up interviews of key pharmacy operations and information technology management in each participating chain pharmacy organization. Main outcome measures: Attitudes, beliefs, and satisfaction of pharmacy personnel regarding e-prescribing, compared with conventional prescribing, and recommendations for improving e-prescribing in the community practice setting. Results: 1,094 surveys were returned from pharmacy personnel practicing in 276 chain community pharmacies. Pharmacy personnel preferred e-prescriptions over conventional prescriptions on each of seven desired outcomes of care. Pharmacists were found to view e-prescribing more positively than technicians (P < 0.05) for its net effect on three key outcomes: patient safety, effectiveness of care, and efficiency of care. A total of 2,235 written comments were received on the returned surveys. Of these, 57{\%} (1,277) mentioned negative features of e-prescribing, while 43{\%} (958) noted positive features. Improved clarity and/or legibility of prescriptions was the most frequently cited advantage of e-prescribing, followed closely by improved speed or efficiency of processing. Prescribing errors were the most commonly cited negative feature of e-prescribing, particularly those stating a wrong drug or wrong directions. Conclusion: Pharmacy personnel were generally satisfied with the current status of e-prescribing, but they also perceive key weaknesses in how it has been implemented in physicians' practices and their own organizations. A total of 11 best-practice recommendations are offered to improve e-prescribing in the chain community pharmacy setting.",
keywords = "Community pharmacy, E-prescribing, Practice guidelines",
author = "Rupp, {Michael T.} and Warholak, {Terri L}",
year = "2008",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1331/JAPhA.2008.07031",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "364--370",
journal = "Journal of the American Pharmacists Association : JAPhA",
issn = "1544-3191",
publisher = "American Pharmacists Association",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of e-prescribing in chain community pharmacy

T2 - Best-practice recommendations

AU - Rupp, Michael T.

AU - Warholak, Terri L

PY - 2008/5

Y1 - 2008/5

N2 - Objectives: To measure the attitudes and beliefs of community-based pharmacists and technicians toward electronic prescribing (e-prescribing) and the processing of e-prescriptions and to generate best-practice recommendations for changes to improve e-prescribing in the community setting. Design: Descriptive, nonexperimental, cross-sectional study. Setting: 422 chain community pharmacies in six states that met a minimum dispensing volume of five e-prescriptions per day. Data were collected between April and July 2006. Participants: Pharmacists, technicians, and student interns. Intervention: Receiving, processing, and dispensing of e-prescriptions assessed via self-administered survey and follow-up interviews of key pharmacy operations and information technology management in each participating chain pharmacy organization. Main outcome measures: Attitudes, beliefs, and satisfaction of pharmacy personnel regarding e-prescribing, compared with conventional prescribing, and recommendations for improving e-prescribing in the community practice setting. Results: 1,094 surveys were returned from pharmacy personnel practicing in 276 chain community pharmacies. Pharmacy personnel preferred e-prescriptions over conventional prescriptions on each of seven desired outcomes of care. Pharmacists were found to view e-prescribing more positively than technicians (P < 0.05) for its net effect on three key outcomes: patient safety, effectiveness of care, and efficiency of care. A total of 2,235 written comments were received on the returned surveys. Of these, 57% (1,277) mentioned negative features of e-prescribing, while 43% (958) noted positive features. Improved clarity and/or legibility of prescriptions was the most frequently cited advantage of e-prescribing, followed closely by improved speed or efficiency of processing. Prescribing errors were the most commonly cited negative feature of e-prescribing, particularly those stating a wrong drug or wrong directions. Conclusion: Pharmacy personnel were generally satisfied with the current status of e-prescribing, but they also perceive key weaknesses in how it has been implemented in physicians' practices and their own organizations. A total of 11 best-practice recommendations are offered to improve e-prescribing in the chain community pharmacy setting.

AB - Objectives: To measure the attitudes and beliefs of community-based pharmacists and technicians toward electronic prescribing (e-prescribing) and the processing of e-prescriptions and to generate best-practice recommendations for changes to improve e-prescribing in the community setting. Design: Descriptive, nonexperimental, cross-sectional study. Setting: 422 chain community pharmacies in six states that met a minimum dispensing volume of five e-prescriptions per day. Data were collected between April and July 2006. Participants: Pharmacists, technicians, and student interns. Intervention: Receiving, processing, and dispensing of e-prescriptions assessed via self-administered survey and follow-up interviews of key pharmacy operations and information technology management in each participating chain pharmacy organization. Main outcome measures: Attitudes, beliefs, and satisfaction of pharmacy personnel regarding e-prescribing, compared with conventional prescribing, and recommendations for improving e-prescribing in the community practice setting. Results: 1,094 surveys were returned from pharmacy personnel practicing in 276 chain community pharmacies. Pharmacy personnel preferred e-prescriptions over conventional prescriptions on each of seven desired outcomes of care. Pharmacists were found to view e-prescribing more positively than technicians (P < 0.05) for its net effect on three key outcomes: patient safety, effectiveness of care, and efficiency of care. A total of 2,235 written comments were received on the returned surveys. Of these, 57% (1,277) mentioned negative features of e-prescribing, while 43% (958) noted positive features. Improved clarity and/or legibility of prescriptions was the most frequently cited advantage of e-prescribing, followed closely by improved speed or efficiency of processing. Prescribing errors were the most commonly cited negative feature of e-prescribing, particularly those stating a wrong drug or wrong directions. Conclusion: Pharmacy personnel were generally satisfied with the current status of e-prescribing, but they also perceive key weaknesses in how it has been implemented in physicians' practices and their own organizations. A total of 11 best-practice recommendations are offered to improve e-prescribing in the chain community pharmacy setting.

KW - Community pharmacy

KW - E-prescribing

KW - Practice guidelines

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=52049088994&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=52049088994&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1331/JAPhA.2008.07031

DO - 10.1331/JAPhA.2008.07031

M3 - Article

C2 - 18595821

AN - SCOPUS:52049088994

VL - 48

SP - 364

EP - 370

JO - Journal of the American Pharmacists Association : JAPhA

JF - Journal of the American Pharmacists Association : JAPhA

SN - 1544-3191

IS - 3

ER -