Evaluation of MODIS NPP and GPP products across multiple biomes

David P. Turner, William D. Ritts, Warren B. Cohen, Stith T. Gower, Steve W. Running, Maosheng Zhao, Marcos H. Costa, Al A. Kirschbaum, Jay M. Ham, Scott Saleska, Douglas E. Ahl

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

365 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Estimates of daily gross primary production (GPP) and annual net primary production (NPP) at the 1 km spatial resolution are now produced operationally for the global terrestrial surface using imagery from the MODIS (Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) sensor. Ecosystem-level measurements of GPP at eddy covariance flux towers and plot-level measurements of NPP over the surrounding landscape offer opportunities for validating the MODIS NPP and GPP products, but these flux measurements must be scaled over areas on the order of 25 km2 to make effective comparisons to the MODIS products. Here, we report results for such comparisons at 9 sites varying widely in biome type and land use. The sites included arctic tundra, boreal forest, temperate hardwood forest, temperate conifer forest, tropical rain forest, tallgrass prairie, desert grassland, and cropland. The ground-based NPP and GPP surfaces were generated by application of the Biome-BGC carbon cycle process model in a spatially-distributed mode. Model inputs of land cover and leaf area index were derived from Landsat data. The MODIS NPP and GPP products showed no overall bias. They tended to be overestimates at low productivity sites - often because of artificially high values of MODIS FPAR (fraction of photosynthetically active radiation absorbed by the canopy), a critical input to the MODIS GPP algorithm. In contrast, the MODIS products tended to be underestimates in high productivity sites - often a function of relatively low values for vegetation light use efficiency in the MODIS GPP algorithm. A global network of sites where both NPP and GPP are measured and scaled over the local landscape is needed to more comprehensively validate the MODIS NPP and GPP products and to potentially calibrate the MODIS NPP/GPP algorithm parameters.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)282-292
Number of pages11
JournalRemote Sensing of Environment
Volume102
Issue number3-4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 15 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer
net primary production
biome
MODIS
primary production
primary productivity
Imaging techniques
ecosystems
evaluation
product
Level measurement
productivity
light use efficiency
temperate forests
eddy covariance
flux measurement
photosynthetically active radiation
temperate forest
tundra
carbon cycle

Keywords

  • Biomes
  • Global
  • Gross primary production
  • Landsat
  • MODIS
  • Monitoring
  • Net primary production
  • Validation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computers in Earth Sciences
  • Earth-Surface Processes
  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Turner, D. P., Ritts, W. D., Cohen, W. B., Gower, S. T., Running, S. W., Zhao, M., ... Ahl, D. E. (2006). Evaluation of MODIS NPP and GPP products across multiple biomes. Remote Sensing of Environment, 102(3-4), 282-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2006.02.017

Evaluation of MODIS NPP and GPP products across multiple biomes. / Turner, David P.; Ritts, William D.; Cohen, Warren B.; Gower, Stith T.; Running, Steve W.; Zhao, Maosheng; Costa, Marcos H.; Kirschbaum, Al A.; Ham, Jay M.; Saleska, Scott; Ahl, Douglas E.

In: Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 102, No. 3-4, 15.06.2006, p. 282-292.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Turner, DP, Ritts, WD, Cohen, WB, Gower, ST, Running, SW, Zhao, M, Costa, MH, Kirschbaum, AA, Ham, JM, Saleska, S & Ahl, DE 2006, 'Evaluation of MODIS NPP and GPP products across multiple biomes', Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 102, no. 3-4, pp. 282-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2006.02.017
Turner DP, Ritts WD, Cohen WB, Gower ST, Running SW, Zhao M et al. Evaluation of MODIS NPP and GPP products across multiple biomes. Remote Sensing of Environment. 2006 Jun 15;102(3-4):282-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2006.02.017
Turner, David P. ; Ritts, William D. ; Cohen, Warren B. ; Gower, Stith T. ; Running, Steve W. ; Zhao, Maosheng ; Costa, Marcos H. ; Kirschbaum, Al A. ; Ham, Jay M. ; Saleska, Scott ; Ahl, Douglas E. / Evaluation of MODIS NPP and GPP products across multiple biomes. In: Remote Sensing of Environment. 2006 ; Vol. 102, No. 3-4. pp. 282-292.
@article{5bdeec5ea42042a6a1f8885565f840fc,
title = "Evaluation of MODIS NPP and GPP products across multiple biomes",
abstract = "Estimates of daily gross primary production (GPP) and annual net primary production (NPP) at the 1 km spatial resolution are now produced operationally for the global terrestrial surface using imagery from the MODIS (Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) sensor. Ecosystem-level measurements of GPP at eddy covariance flux towers and plot-level measurements of NPP over the surrounding landscape offer opportunities for validating the MODIS NPP and GPP products, but these flux measurements must be scaled over areas on the order of 25 km2 to make effective comparisons to the MODIS products. Here, we report results for such comparisons at 9 sites varying widely in biome type and land use. The sites included arctic tundra, boreal forest, temperate hardwood forest, temperate conifer forest, tropical rain forest, tallgrass prairie, desert grassland, and cropland. The ground-based NPP and GPP surfaces were generated by application of the Biome-BGC carbon cycle process model in a spatially-distributed mode. Model inputs of land cover and leaf area index were derived from Landsat data. The MODIS NPP and GPP products showed no overall bias. They tended to be overestimates at low productivity sites - often because of artificially high values of MODIS FPAR (fraction of photosynthetically active radiation absorbed by the canopy), a critical input to the MODIS GPP algorithm. In contrast, the MODIS products tended to be underestimates in high productivity sites - often a function of relatively low values for vegetation light use efficiency in the MODIS GPP algorithm. A global network of sites where both NPP and GPP are measured and scaled over the local landscape is needed to more comprehensively validate the MODIS NPP and GPP products and to potentially calibrate the MODIS NPP/GPP algorithm parameters.",
keywords = "Biomes, Global, Gross primary production, Landsat, MODIS, Monitoring, Net primary production, Validation",
author = "Turner, {David P.} and Ritts, {William D.} and Cohen, {Warren B.} and Gower, {Stith T.} and Running, {Steve W.} and Maosheng Zhao and Costa, {Marcos H.} and Kirschbaum, {Al A.} and Ham, {Jay M.} and Scott Saleska and Ahl, {Douglas E.}",
year = "2006",
month = "6",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.rse.2006.02.017",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "102",
pages = "282--292",
journal = "Remote Sensing of Environment",
issn = "0034-4257",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3-4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of MODIS NPP and GPP products across multiple biomes

AU - Turner, David P.

AU - Ritts, William D.

AU - Cohen, Warren B.

AU - Gower, Stith T.

AU - Running, Steve W.

AU - Zhao, Maosheng

AU - Costa, Marcos H.

AU - Kirschbaum, Al A.

AU - Ham, Jay M.

AU - Saleska, Scott

AU - Ahl, Douglas E.

PY - 2006/6/15

Y1 - 2006/6/15

N2 - Estimates of daily gross primary production (GPP) and annual net primary production (NPP) at the 1 km spatial resolution are now produced operationally for the global terrestrial surface using imagery from the MODIS (Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) sensor. Ecosystem-level measurements of GPP at eddy covariance flux towers and plot-level measurements of NPP over the surrounding landscape offer opportunities for validating the MODIS NPP and GPP products, but these flux measurements must be scaled over areas on the order of 25 km2 to make effective comparisons to the MODIS products. Here, we report results for such comparisons at 9 sites varying widely in biome type and land use. The sites included arctic tundra, boreal forest, temperate hardwood forest, temperate conifer forest, tropical rain forest, tallgrass prairie, desert grassland, and cropland. The ground-based NPP and GPP surfaces were generated by application of the Biome-BGC carbon cycle process model in a spatially-distributed mode. Model inputs of land cover and leaf area index were derived from Landsat data. The MODIS NPP and GPP products showed no overall bias. They tended to be overestimates at low productivity sites - often because of artificially high values of MODIS FPAR (fraction of photosynthetically active radiation absorbed by the canopy), a critical input to the MODIS GPP algorithm. In contrast, the MODIS products tended to be underestimates in high productivity sites - often a function of relatively low values for vegetation light use efficiency in the MODIS GPP algorithm. A global network of sites where both NPP and GPP are measured and scaled over the local landscape is needed to more comprehensively validate the MODIS NPP and GPP products and to potentially calibrate the MODIS NPP/GPP algorithm parameters.

AB - Estimates of daily gross primary production (GPP) and annual net primary production (NPP) at the 1 km spatial resolution are now produced operationally for the global terrestrial surface using imagery from the MODIS (Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) sensor. Ecosystem-level measurements of GPP at eddy covariance flux towers and plot-level measurements of NPP over the surrounding landscape offer opportunities for validating the MODIS NPP and GPP products, but these flux measurements must be scaled over areas on the order of 25 km2 to make effective comparisons to the MODIS products. Here, we report results for such comparisons at 9 sites varying widely in biome type and land use. The sites included arctic tundra, boreal forest, temperate hardwood forest, temperate conifer forest, tropical rain forest, tallgrass prairie, desert grassland, and cropland. The ground-based NPP and GPP surfaces were generated by application of the Biome-BGC carbon cycle process model in a spatially-distributed mode. Model inputs of land cover and leaf area index were derived from Landsat data. The MODIS NPP and GPP products showed no overall bias. They tended to be overestimates at low productivity sites - often because of artificially high values of MODIS FPAR (fraction of photosynthetically active radiation absorbed by the canopy), a critical input to the MODIS GPP algorithm. In contrast, the MODIS products tended to be underestimates in high productivity sites - often a function of relatively low values for vegetation light use efficiency in the MODIS GPP algorithm. A global network of sites where both NPP and GPP are measured and scaled over the local landscape is needed to more comprehensively validate the MODIS NPP and GPP products and to potentially calibrate the MODIS NPP/GPP algorithm parameters.

KW - Biomes

KW - Global

KW - Gross primary production

KW - Landsat

KW - MODIS

KW - Monitoring

KW - Net primary production

KW - Validation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646854424&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33646854424&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.rse.2006.02.017

DO - 10.1016/j.rse.2006.02.017

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33646854424

VL - 102

SP - 282

EP - 292

JO - Remote Sensing of Environment

JF - Remote Sensing of Environment

SN - 0034-4257

IS - 3-4

ER -