Evaluation of sample recovery efficiency for bacteriophage P22 on fomites

Amanda B. Herzog, Alok K. Pandey, David Reyes-Gastelum, Charles P Gerba, Joan B. Rose, Syed A. Hashsham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Fomites are known to play a role in the transmission of pathogens. Quantitative analysis of the parameters that affect sample recovery efficiency (SRE) at the limit of detection of viruses on fomites will aid in improving quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) and infection control. The variability in SRE as a function of fomite type, fomite surface area, sampling time, application media, relative humidity (rH), and wetting agent was evaluated. To quantify the SRE, bacteriophage P22 was applied onto fomites at average surface densities of 0.4±0.2 and 4±2 PFU/cm2. Surface areas of 100 and 1,000 cm2 of nonporous fomites found in indoor environments (acrylic, galvanized steel, and laminate) were evaluated with premoistened antistatic wipes. The parameters with the most effects on the SRE were sampling time, fomite surface area, wetting agent, and rH. At time zero (the initial application of bacteriophage P22), the SRE for the 1,000-cm2 fomite surface area was, on average, 40% lower than that for the 100-cm2 fomite surface area. For both fomite surface areas, the application medium Trypticase soy broth (TSB) and/or the laminate fomite predominantly resulted in a higher SRE. After the applied samples dried on the fomites (20 min), the average SRE was less than 3%. A TSB wetting agent applied on the fomite improved the SRE for all samples at 20 min. In addition, an rH greater than 28% generally resulted in a higher SRE than an rH less than 28%. The parameters impacting SRE at the limit of detection have the potential to enhance sampling strategies and data collection for QMRA models.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)7915-7922
Number of pages8
JournalApplied and Environmental Microbiology
Volume78
Issue number22
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2012

Fingerprint

Fomites
Bacteriophage P22
fomites
bacteriophage
bacteriophages
surface area
Wetting Agents
relative humidity
sampling
Humidity
wetting
microbiological risk assessment
quantitative risk assessment
risk assessment
evaluation
Limit of Detection
detection limit
quantitative analysis
Infectious Disease Transmission
Steel

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
  • Food Science
  • Biotechnology
  • Ecology

Cite this

Herzog, A. B., Pandey, A. K., Reyes-Gastelum, D., Gerba, C. P., Rose, J. B., & Hashsham, S. A. (2012). Evaluation of sample recovery efficiency for bacteriophage P22 on fomites. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 78(22), 7915-7922. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01370-12

Evaluation of sample recovery efficiency for bacteriophage P22 on fomites. / Herzog, Amanda B.; Pandey, Alok K.; Reyes-Gastelum, David; Gerba, Charles P; Rose, Joan B.; Hashsham, Syed A.

In: Applied and Environmental Microbiology, Vol. 78, No. 22, 11.2012, p. 7915-7922.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Herzog, AB, Pandey, AK, Reyes-Gastelum, D, Gerba, CP, Rose, JB & Hashsham, SA 2012, 'Evaluation of sample recovery efficiency for bacteriophage P22 on fomites', Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 78, no. 22, pp. 7915-7922. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01370-12
Herzog, Amanda B. ; Pandey, Alok K. ; Reyes-Gastelum, David ; Gerba, Charles P ; Rose, Joan B. ; Hashsham, Syed A. / Evaluation of sample recovery efficiency for bacteriophage P22 on fomites. In: Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2012 ; Vol. 78, No. 22. pp. 7915-7922.
@article{ab728c2568e94619b82cff4a919d789d,
title = "Evaluation of sample recovery efficiency for bacteriophage P22 on fomites",
abstract = "Fomites are known to play a role in the transmission of pathogens. Quantitative analysis of the parameters that affect sample recovery efficiency (SRE) at the limit of detection of viruses on fomites will aid in improving quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) and infection control. The variability in SRE as a function of fomite type, fomite surface area, sampling time, application media, relative humidity (rH), and wetting agent was evaluated. To quantify the SRE, bacteriophage P22 was applied onto fomites at average surface densities of 0.4±0.2 and 4±2 PFU/cm2. Surface areas of 100 and 1,000 cm2 of nonporous fomites found in indoor environments (acrylic, galvanized steel, and laminate) were evaluated with premoistened antistatic wipes. The parameters with the most effects on the SRE were sampling time, fomite surface area, wetting agent, and rH. At time zero (the initial application of bacteriophage P22), the SRE for the 1,000-cm2 fomite surface area was, on average, 40{\%} lower than that for the 100-cm2 fomite surface area. For both fomite surface areas, the application medium Trypticase soy broth (TSB) and/or the laminate fomite predominantly resulted in a higher SRE. After the applied samples dried on the fomites (20 min), the average SRE was less than 3{\%}. A TSB wetting agent applied on the fomite improved the SRE for all samples at 20 min. In addition, an rH greater than 28{\%} generally resulted in a higher SRE than an rH less than 28{\%}. The parameters impacting SRE at the limit of detection have the potential to enhance sampling strategies and data collection for QMRA models.",
author = "Herzog, {Amanda B.} and Pandey, {Alok K.} and David Reyes-Gastelum and Gerba, {Charles P} and Rose, {Joan B.} and Hashsham, {Syed A.}",
year = "2012",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1128/AEM.01370-12",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "78",
pages = "7915--7922",
journal = "Applied and Environmental Microbiology",
issn = "0099-2240",
publisher = "American Society for Microbiology",
number = "22",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of sample recovery efficiency for bacteriophage P22 on fomites

AU - Herzog, Amanda B.

AU - Pandey, Alok K.

AU - Reyes-Gastelum, David

AU - Gerba, Charles P

AU - Rose, Joan B.

AU - Hashsham, Syed A.

PY - 2012/11

Y1 - 2012/11

N2 - Fomites are known to play a role in the transmission of pathogens. Quantitative analysis of the parameters that affect sample recovery efficiency (SRE) at the limit of detection of viruses on fomites will aid in improving quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) and infection control. The variability in SRE as a function of fomite type, fomite surface area, sampling time, application media, relative humidity (rH), and wetting agent was evaluated. To quantify the SRE, bacteriophage P22 was applied onto fomites at average surface densities of 0.4±0.2 and 4±2 PFU/cm2. Surface areas of 100 and 1,000 cm2 of nonporous fomites found in indoor environments (acrylic, galvanized steel, and laminate) were evaluated with premoistened antistatic wipes. The parameters with the most effects on the SRE were sampling time, fomite surface area, wetting agent, and rH. At time zero (the initial application of bacteriophage P22), the SRE for the 1,000-cm2 fomite surface area was, on average, 40% lower than that for the 100-cm2 fomite surface area. For both fomite surface areas, the application medium Trypticase soy broth (TSB) and/or the laminate fomite predominantly resulted in a higher SRE. After the applied samples dried on the fomites (20 min), the average SRE was less than 3%. A TSB wetting agent applied on the fomite improved the SRE for all samples at 20 min. In addition, an rH greater than 28% generally resulted in a higher SRE than an rH less than 28%. The parameters impacting SRE at the limit of detection have the potential to enhance sampling strategies and data collection for QMRA models.

AB - Fomites are known to play a role in the transmission of pathogens. Quantitative analysis of the parameters that affect sample recovery efficiency (SRE) at the limit of detection of viruses on fomites will aid in improving quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) and infection control. The variability in SRE as a function of fomite type, fomite surface area, sampling time, application media, relative humidity (rH), and wetting agent was evaluated. To quantify the SRE, bacteriophage P22 was applied onto fomites at average surface densities of 0.4±0.2 and 4±2 PFU/cm2. Surface areas of 100 and 1,000 cm2 of nonporous fomites found in indoor environments (acrylic, galvanized steel, and laminate) were evaluated with premoistened antistatic wipes. The parameters with the most effects on the SRE were sampling time, fomite surface area, wetting agent, and rH. At time zero (the initial application of bacteriophage P22), the SRE for the 1,000-cm2 fomite surface area was, on average, 40% lower than that for the 100-cm2 fomite surface area. For both fomite surface areas, the application medium Trypticase soy broth (TSB) and/or the laminate fomite predominantly resulted in a higher SRE. After the applied samples dried on the fomites (20 min), the average SRE was less than 3%. A TSB wetting agent applied on the fomite improved the SRE for all samples at 20 min. In addition, an rH greater than 28% generally resulted in a higher SRE than an rH less than 28%. The parameters impacting SRE at the limit of detection have the potential to enhance sampling strategies and data collection for QMRA models.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84868626632&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84868626632&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1128/AEM.01370-12

DO - 10.1128/AEM.01370-12

M3 - Article

VL - 78

SP - 7915

EP - 7922

JO - Applied and Environmental Microbiology

JF - Applied and Environmental Microbiology

SN - 0099-2240

IS - 22

ER -