Evaluation of the Number-Needed-to-Biopsy Metric for the Diagnosis of Cutaneous Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Kelly C. Nelson, Susan M. Swetter, Kathylynn Saboda, Suephy C. Chen, Clara N Curiel

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Importance: To date, no concerted effort has been made to date to evaluate the literature on number-needed-to-biopsy (NNB) metrics, particularly to account for the differences in clinician type and melanoma prevalence in certain geographic locations. Objective: To review and synthesize worldwide data for NNB for the diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma. Data Source: MEDLINE, Embase, and PubMed databases were searched for English-language articles published worldwide from January 1, 2000, to November 28, 2018. Study Selection: A total of 46 studies were included that addressed NNB for at least 3681 clinicians worldwide and included 455 496 biopsied tumors and 29 257 melanomas; primary care practitioner (PCP) data were only available from Australia. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Articles were screened for eligibility, and possible overlapping data sets were resolved. Data extracted included clinician specialization, use of dermoscopy, geographic region and location-specific health care system, study design, number of benign tumors, number of melanomas, and NNB. The review followed the PRISMA guidelines. Main Outcome and Measures: The NNB for the diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma. Results: A total of 46 studies were included that addressed NNB for at least 3681 clinicians worldwide and included 455496 biopsied tumors and 29257 melanomas; primary care practitioner (PCP) data were only available from Australia. The reported NNB ranged from 2.2 to 287, and the weighted mean NNB for all included publications was 15.6. The exclusion of publications structured as all biopsied tumors, owing to variable data characterization, resulted in reported NNB ranging from 2.2 to 30.5, with a global weighted mean NNB of 14.8 for all clinicians, 7.5 for all dermatologists, 14.6 for Australian PCPs, and 13.2 for all US-based dermatological practitioners, including dermatologists and advanced practice professionals. The summary effect size (ES) demonstrates that a mean 4% of biopsies demonstrated melanoma for study stratum A (all biopsied skin tumors, ES, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.03-0.05), and a mean 12% of biopsies demonstrated melanoma for study strata B (melanocytic tumors on pathology review, ES, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.10-0.14) and C (clinical concern for melanoma, ES; 0.12; 95% CI, 0.09-0.14). Conclusions and Relevance: The existing NNB for cutaneous melanoma appeared to vary widely worldwide, lacking standardization in the metric and its reporting, and according to clinician characteristics as well; the NNB of US-based clinicians may warrant further exploration.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJAMA Dermatology
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Meta-Analysis
Melanoma
Biopsy
Skin
Geographic Locations
Neoplasms
Publications
Primary Health Care
Dermoscopy
Professional Practice
Information Storage and Retrieval
PubMed
MEDLINE
Language
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Databases
Guidelines
Pathology
Delivery of Health Care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dermatology

Cite this

Evaluation of the Number-Needed-to-Biopsy Metric for the Diagnosis of Cutaneous Melanoma : A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. / Nelson, Kelly C.; Swetter, Susan M.; Saboda, Kathylynn; Chen, Suephy C.; Curiel, Clara N.

In: JAMA Dermatology, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{d214dd3c3e4945bcbf6cf0680250df81,
title = "Evaluation of the Number-Needed-to-Biopsy Metric for the Diagnosis of Cutaneous Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis",
abstract = "Importance: To date, no concerted effort has been made to date to evaluate the literature on number-needed-to-biopsy (NNB) metrics, particularly to account for the differences in clinician type and melanoma prevalence in certain geographic locations. Objective: To review and synthesize worldwide data for NNB for the diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma. Data Source: MEDLINE, Embase, and PubMed databases were searched for English-language articles published worldwide from January 1, 2000, to November 28, 2018. Study Selection: A total of 46 studies were included that addressed NNB for at least 3681 clinicians worldwide and included 455 496 biopsied tumors and 29 257 melanomas; primary care practitioner (PCP) data were only available from Australia. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Articles were screened for eligibility, and possible overlapping data sets were resolved. Data extracted included clinician specialization, use of dermoscopy, geographic region and location-specific health care system, study design, number of benign tumors, number of melanomas, and NNB. The review followed the PRISMA guidelines. Main Outcome and Measures: The NNB for the diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma. Results: A total of 46 studies were included that addressed NNB for at least 3681 clinicians worldwide and included 455496 biopsied tumors and 29257 melanomas; primary care practitioner (PCP) data were only available from Australia. The reported NNB ranged from 2.2 to 287, and the weighted mean NNB for all included publications was 15.6. The exclusion of publications structured as all biopsied tumors, owing to variable data characterization, resulted in reported NNB ranging from 2.2 to 30.5, with a global weighted mean NNB of 14.8 for all clinicians, 7.5 for all dermatologists, 14.6 for Australian PCPs, and 13.2 for all US-based dermatological practitioners, including dermatologists and advanced practice professionals. The summary effect size (ES) demonstrates that a mean 4{\%} of biopsies demonstrated melanoma for study stratum A (all biopsied skin tumors, ES, 0.04; 95{\%} CI, 0.03-0.05), and a mean 12{\%} of biopsies demonstrated melanoma for study strata B (melanocytic tumors on pathology review, ES, 0.12; 95{\%} CI, 0.10-0.14) and C (clinical concern for melanoma, ES; 0.12; 95{\%} CI, 0.09-0.14). Conclusions and Relevance: The existing NNB for cutaneous melanoma appeared to vary widely worldwide, lacking standardization in the metric and its reporting, and according to clinician characteristics as well; the NNB of US-based clinicians may warrant further exploration.",
author = "Nelson, {Kelly C.} and Swetter, {Susan M.} and Kathylynn Saboda and Chen, {Suephy C.} and Curiel, {Clara N}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1001/jamadermatol.2019.1514",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "JAMA Dermatology",
issn = "2168-6068",
publisher = "American Medical Association",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of the Number-Needed-to-Biopsy Metric for the Diagnosis of Cutaneous Melanoma

T2 - A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

AU - Nelson, Kelly C.

AU - Swetter, Susan M.

AU - Saboda, Kathylynn

AU - Chen, Suephy C.

AU - Curiel, Clara N

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Importance: To date, no concerted effort has been made to date to evaluate the literature on number-needed-to-biopsy (NNB) metrics, particularly to account for the differences in clinician type and melanoma prevalence in certain geographic locations. Objective: To review and synthesize worldwide data for NNB for the diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma. Data Source: MEDLINE, Embase, and PubMed databases were searched for English-language articles published worldwide from January 1, 2000, to November 28, 2018. Study Selection: A total of 46 studies were included that addressed NNB for at least 3681 clinicians worldwide and included 455 496 biopsied tumors and 29 257 melanomas; primary care practitioner (PCP) data were only available from Australia. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Articles were screened for eligibility, and possible overlapping data sets were resolved. Data extracted included clinician specialization, use of dermoscopy, geographic region and location-specific health care system, study design, number of benign tumors, number of melanomas, and NNB. The review followed the PRISMA guidelines. Main Outcome and Measures: The NNB for the diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma. Results: A total of 46 studies were included that addressed NNB for at least 3681 clinicians worldwide and included 455496 biopsied tumors and 29257 melanomas; primary care practitioner (PCP) data were only available from Australia. The reported NNB ranged from 2.2 to 287, and the weighted mean NNB for all included publications was 15.6. The exclusion of publications structured as all biopsied tumors, owing to variable data characterization, resulted in reported NNB ranging from 2.2 to 30.5, with a global weighted mean NNB of 14.8 for all clinicians, 7.5 for all dermatologists, 14.6 for Australian PCPs, and 13.2 for all US-based dermatological practitioners, including dermatologists and advanced practice professionals. The summary effect size (ES) demonstrates that a mean 4% of biopsies demonstrated melanoma for study stratum A (all biopsied skin tumors, ES, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.03-0.05), and a mean 12% of biopsies demonstrated melanoma for study strata B (melanocytic tumors on pathology review, ES, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.10-0.14) and C (clinical concern for melanoma, ES; 0.12; 95% CI, 0.09-0.14). Conclusions and Relevance: The existing NNB for cutaneous melanoma appeared to vary widely worldwide, lacking standardization in the metric and its reporting, and according to clinician characteristics as well; the NNB of US-based clinicians may warrant further exploration.

AB - Importance: To date, no concerted effort has been made to date to evaluate the literature on number-needed-to-biopsy (NNB) metrics, particularly to account for the differences in clinician type and melanoma prevalence in certain geographic locations. Objective: To review and synthesize worldwide data for NNB for the diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma. Data Source: MEDLINE, Embase, and PubMed databases were searched for English-language articles published worldwide from January 1, 2000, to November 28, 2018. Study Selection: A total of 46 studies were included that addressed NNB for at least 3681 clinicians worldwide and included 455 496 biopsied tumors and 29 257 melanomas; primary care practitioner (PCP) data were only available from Australia. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Articles were screened for eligibility, and possible overlapping data sets were resolved. Data extracted included clinician specialization, use of dermoscopy, geographic region and location-specific health care system, study design, number of benign tumors, number of melanomas, and NNB. The review followed the PRISMA guidelines. Main Outcome and Measures: The NNB for the diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma. Results: A total of 46 studies were included that addressed NNB for at least 3681 clinicians worldwide and included 455496 biopsied tumors and 29257 melanomas; primary care practitioner (PCP) data were only available from Australia. The reported NNB ranged from 2.2 to 287, and the weighted mean NNB for all included publications was 15.6. The exclusion of publications structured as all biopsied tumors, owing to variable data characterization, resulted in reported NNB ranging from 2.2 to 30.5, with a global weighted mean NNB of 14.8 for all clinicians, 7.5 for all dermatologists, 14.6 for Australian PCPs, and 13.2 for all US-based dermatological practitioners, including dermatologists and advanced practice professionals. The summary effect size (ES) demonstrates that a mean 4% of biopsies demonstrated melanoma for study stratum A (all biopsied skin tumors, ES, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.03-0.05), and a mean 12% of biopsies demonstrated melanoma for study strata B (melanocytic tumors on pathology review, ES, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.10-0.14) and C (clinical concern for melanoma, ES; 0.12; 95% CI, 0.09-0.14). Conclusions and Relevance: The existing NNB for cutaneous melanoma appeared to vary widely worldwide, lacking standardization in the metric and its reporting, and according to clinician characteristics as well; the NNB of US-based clinicians may warrant further exploration.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068826829&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85068826829&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/jamadermatol.2019.1514

DO - 10.1001/jamadermatol.2019.1514

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85068826829

JO - JAMA Dermatology

JF - JAMA Dermatology

SN - 2168-6068

ER -