Evaluation of well designs to improve access to safe and clean water in rural Tanzania

Aminata Kilungo, Linda S Powers, Nathan Arnold, Kelli Whelan, Kurt Paterson, Dale Young

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The objective of this study was to examine three well designs: drilled wells (20–30 m deep), closed dug wells (>5 m deep), and hand-dug open wells (<5 m deep), to determine the water quality for improving access to safe and clean water in rural communities. Heterotrophic plate count (HPC), total coliforms (TC), Escherichia coli (E. coli) and turbidity, were used to assess the water quality of 97 wells. Additionally, the study looked at the microflora diversity of the water, focusing on potential pathogens using outgrowth, PCR, and genome sequencing for 10 wells. Concentrations of TC for the open dug wells (4 × 104 CFU/100 mL) were higher than the drilled (2 × 103 CFU/100 mL) and closed dug wells (3 × 103 CFU/100 mL). E. coli concentration for drilled and closed dug wells was <22 MPN (most probable number)/100 mL, but higher for open wells (>154 MPN/100 mL). The drilled well turbidity (11 NTU) was within the standard deviation of the closed well (28 NTU) compared to open dug wells (49 NTU). Drilled and closed wells had similar microbial diversity. There were no significant differences between drilled and closed dug wells. The covering and lining of hand-dug wells should be considered as an alternative to improve access to safe and clean water in rural communities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number64
JournalInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 4 2018

Fingerprint

Tanzania
Hand
Water
Rural Population

Keywords

  • Borehole
  • Coliform
  • Escherichia coli
  • Groundwater
  • Ifakara
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
  • Tanzania
  • Water quality
  • Well comparison
  • Well depth
  • Well design

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Cite this

Evaluation of well designs to improve access to safe and clean water in rural Tanzania. / Kilungo, Aminata; Powers, Linda S; Arnold, Nathan; Whelan, Kelli; Paterson, Kurt; Young, Dale.

In: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 15, No. 1, 64, 04.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kilungo, Aminata ; Powers, Linda S ; Arnold, Nathan ; Whelan, Kelli ; Paterson, Kurt ; Young, Dale. / Evaluation of well designs to improve access to safe and clean water in rural Tanzania. In: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2018 ; Vol. 15, No. 1.
@article{e45495b77bcb4f15a595577335aa8569,
title = "Evaluation of well designs to improve access to safe and clean water in rural Tanzania",
abstract = "The objective of this study was to examine three well designs: drilled wells (20–30 m deep), closed dug wells (>5 m deep), and hand-dug open wells (<5 m deep), to determine the water quality for improving access to safe and clean water in rural communities. Heterotrophic plate count (HPC), total coliforms (TC), Escherichia coli (E. coli) and turbidity, were used to assess the water quality of 97 wells. Additionally, the study looked at the microflora diversity of the water, focusing on potential pathogens using outgrowth, PCR, and genome sequencing for 10 wells. Concentrations of TC for the open dug wells (4 × 104 CFU/100 mL) were higher than the drilled (2 × 103 CFU/100 mL) and closed dug wells (3 × 103 CFU/100 mL). E. coli concentration for drilled and closed dug wells was <22 MPN (most probable number)/100 mL, but higher for open wells (>154 MPN/100 mL). The drilled well turbidity (11 NTU) was within the standard deviation of the closed well (28 NTU) compared to open dug wells (49 NTU). Drilled and closed wells had similar microbial diversity. There were no significant differences between drilled and closed dug wells. The covering and lining of hand-dug wells should be considered as an alternative to improve access to safe and clean water in rural communities.",
keywords = "Borehole, Coliform, Escherichia coli, Groundwater, Ifakara, Sub-Saharan Africa, Tanzania, Water quality, Well comparison, Well depth, Well design",
author = "Aminata Kilungo and Powers, {Linda S} and Nathan Arnold and Kelli Whelan and Kurt Paterson and Dale Young",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "4",
doi = "10.3390/ijerph15010064",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
journal = "International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health",
issn = "1661-7827",
publisher = "Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of well designs to improve access to safe and clean water in rural Tanzania

AU - Kilungo, Aminata

AU - Powers, Linda S

AU - Arnold, Nathan

AU - Whelan, Kelli

AU - Paterson, Kurt

AU - Young, Dale

PY - 2018/1/4

Y1 - 2018/1/4

N2 - The objective of this study was to examine three well designs: drilled wells (20–30 m deep), closed dug wells (>5 m deep), and hand-dug open wells (<5 m deep), to determine the water quality for improving access to safe and clean water in rural communities. Heterotrophic plate count (HPC), total coliforms (TC), Escherichia coli (E. coli) and turbidity, were used to assess the water quality of 97 wells. Additionally, the study looked at the microflora diversity of the water, focusing on potential pathogens using outgrowth, PCR, and genome sequencing for 10 wells. Concentrations of TC for the open dug wells (4 × 104 CFU/100 mL) were higher than the drilled (2 × 103 CFU/100 mL) and closed dug wells (3 × 103 CFU/100 mL). E. coli concentration for drilled and closed dug wells was <22 MPN (most probable number)/100 mL, but higher for open wells (>154 MPN/100 mL). The drilled well turbidity (11 NTU) was within the standard deviation of the closed well (28 NTU) compared to open dug wells (49 NTU). Drilled and closed wells had similar microbial diversity. There were no significant differences between drilled and closed dug wells. The covering and lining of hand-dug wells should be considered as an alternative to improve access to safe and clean water in rural communities.

AB - The objective of this study was to examine three well designs: drilled wells (20–30 m deep), closed dug wells (>5 m deep), and hand-dug open wells (<5 m deep), to determine the water quality for improving access to safe and clean water in rural communities. Heterotrophic plate count (HPC), total coliforms (TC), Escherichia coli (E. coli) and turbidity, were used to assess the water quality of 97 wells. Additionally, the study looked at the microflora diversity of the water, focusing on potential pathogens using outgrowth, PCR, and genome sequencing for 10 wells. Concentrations of TC for the open dug wells (4 × 104 CFU/100 mL) were higher than the drilled (2 × 103 CFU/100 mL) and closed dug wells (3 × 103 CFU/100 mL). E. coli concentration for drilled and closed dug wells was <22 MPN (most probable number)/100 mL, but higher for open wells (>154 MPN/100 mL). The drilled well turbidity (11 NTU) was within the standard deviation of the closed well (28 NTU) compared to open dug wells (49 NTU). Drilled and closed wells had similar microbial diversity. There were no significant differences between drilled and closed dug wells. The covering and lining of hand-dug wells should be considered as an alternative to improve access to safe and clean water in rural communities.

KW - Borehole

KW - Coliform

KW - Escherichia coli

KW - Groundwater

KW - Ifakara

KW - Sub-Saharan Africa

KW - Tanzania

KW - Water quality

KW - Well comparison

KW - Well depth

KW - Well design

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040231808&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85040231808&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/ijerph15010064

DO - 10.3390/ijerph15010064

M3 - Article

C2 - 29300305

AN - SCOPUS:85040231808

VL - 15

JO - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

JF - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

SN - 1661-7827

IS - 1

M1 - 64

ER -