Event-method directed forgetting: Forgetting a video segment is more effortful than remembering it

Jonathan M. Fawcett, Tracy L. Taylor, Lynn Nadel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Videos were presented depicting events such as baking cookies or cleaning a fish tank. Periodically, the video paused and an instruction to Remember (R) or Forget (F) the preceding video segment was presented; the video then resumed. Participants later responded more accurately to cued-recall questions (E1) and to true/false statements (E2-5) regarding R segments than F segments. This difference was larger for specific information (the woman added 3 cups of flour) than for general information (the woman added flour). Participants were also slower to detect visual probes presented following F instructions compared to those presented following R instructions. These findings suggest that intentional forgetting is an effortful process that can be performed even on segments of otherwise continuous events and that the result is a relatively impoverished representation of the unwanted information in memory.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)332-343
Number of pages12
JournalActa Psychologica
Volume144
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2013

Fingerprint

Flour
Fishes
Remembering
Forgetting

Keywords

  • Cognition
  • Events
  • Intentional forgetting
  • Memory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Event-method directed forgetting : Forgetting a video segment is more effortful than remembering it. / Fawcett, Jonathan M.; Taylor, Tracy L.; Nadel, Lynn.

In: Acta Psychologica, Vol. 144, No. 2, 10.2013, p. 332-343.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fawcett, Jonathan M. ; Taylor, Tracy L. ; Nadel, Lynn. / Event-method directed forgetting : Forgetting a video segment is more effortful than remembering it. In: Acta Psychologica. 2013 ; Vol. 144, No. 2. pp. 332-343.
@article{dca670b7073242e5a777a45f88c30297,
title = "Event-method directed forgetting: Forgetting a video segment is more effortful than remembering it",
abstract = "Videos were presented depicting events such as baking cookies or cleaning a fish tank. Periodically, the video paused and an instruction to Remember (R) or Forget (F) the preceding video segment was presented; the video then resumed. Participants later responded more accurately to cued-recall questions (E1) and to true/false statements (E2-5) regarding R segments than F segments. This difference was larger for specific information (the woman added 3 cups of flour) than for general information (the woman added flour). Participants were also slower to detect visual probes presented following F instructions compared to those presented following R instructions. These findings suggest that intentional forgetting is an effortful process that can be performed even on segments of otherwise continuous events and that the result is a relatively impoverished representation of the unwanted information in memory.",
keywords = "Cognition, Events, Intentional forgetting, Memory",
author = "Fawcett, {Jonathan M.} and Taylor, {Tracy L.} and Lynn Nadel",
year = "2013",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.07.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "144",
pages = "332--343",
journal = "Acta Psychologica",
issn = "0001-6918",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Event-method directed forgetting

T2 - Forgetting a video segment is more effortful than remembering it

AU - Fawcett, Jonathan M.

AU - Taylor, Tracy L.

AU - Nadel, Lynn

PY - 2013/10

Y1 - 2013/10

N2 - Videos were presented depicting events such as baking cookies or cleaning a fish tank. Periodically, the video paused and an instruction to Remember (R) or Forget (F) the preceding video segment was presented; the video then resumed. Participants later responded more accurately to cued-recall questions (E1) and to true/false statements (E2-5) regarding R segments than F segments. This difference was larger for specific information (the woman added 3 cups of flour) than for general information (the woman added flour). Participants were also slower to detect visual probes presented following F instructions compared to those presented following R instructions. These findings suggest that intentional forgetting is an effortful process that can be performed even on segments of otherwise continuous events and that the result is a relatively impoverished representation of the unwanted information in memory.

AB - Videos were presented depicting events such as baking cookies or cleaning a fish tank. Periodically, the video paused and an instruction to Remember (R) or Forget (F) the preceding video segment was presented; the video then resumed. Participants later responded more accurately to cued-recall questions (E1) and to true/false statements (E2-5) regarding R segments than F segments. This difference was larger for specific information (the woman added 3 cups of flour) than for general information (the woman added flour). Participants were also slower to detect visual probes presented following F instructions compared to those presented following R instructions. These findings suggest that intentional forgetting is an effortful process that can be performed even on segments of otherwise continuous events and that the result is a relatively impoverished representation of the unwanted information in memory.

KW - Cognition

KW - Events

KW - Intentional forgetting

KW - Memory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84882664482&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84882664482&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.07.005

DO - 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.07.005

M3 - Article

C2 - 23933003

AN - SCOPUS:84882664482

VL - 144

SP - 332

EP - 343

JO - Acta Psychologica

JF - Acta Psychologica

SN - 0001-6918

IS - 2

ER -