Evidence that blatant versus subtle stereotype threat cues impact performance through dual processes

Jeffrey A Stone, Chad McWhinnie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

58 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

An experiment tested three competing hypotheses for how blatant and subtle stereotype threat cues influence the performance of female sports participants on a golf-putting task. A "predominant" model predicts that blatant threat cues have a more negative effect on performance than subtle threat cues, whereas an "additive" model predicts that both cues combine to have a greater negative effect than either threat cue alone. However, a "dual process" model predicts that each threat cue has an independent negative influence through separate mechanisms. To test these predictions, we varied the presence of blatant (e.g., the task frame) and subtle cues (e.g., the gender of the experimenter) for negative stereotypes about female athletes, and then measured both the number of strokes required to finish the course and accuracy on the last putt of each hole. The results supported the dual process model prediction: females required more strokes to finish the golf task when it was framed as measuring gender differences compared to racial differences in athletic ability, and females performed less accurately on the last putt of each hole in the presence of a male versus a female experimenter. The discussion focuses on how the presence of multiple stereotype threat cues can induce independent mechanisms that may have separate but simultaneously deleterious effects on performance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)445-452
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Experimental Social Psychology
Volume44
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2008

Fingerprint

Cues
stereotype
threat
performance
evidence
Golf
stroke
Stroke
athlete
Athletic Performance
Aptitude
gender-specific factors
Sports
Athletes
experiment
gender
ability

Keywords

  • Athlete
  • Dual process
  • Female
  • Sports
  • Stereotype threat

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Evidence that blatant versus subtle stereotype threat cues impact performance through dual processes. / Stone, Jeffrey A; McWhinnie, Chad.

In: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 44, No. 2, 03.2008, p. 445-452.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{59827204f48e4ea483972618864bcaee,
title = "Evidence that blatant versus subtle stereotype threat cues impact performance through dual processes",
abstract = "An experiment tested three competing hypotheses for how blatant and subtle stereotype threat cues influence the performance of female sports participants on a golf-putting task. A {"}predominant{"} model predicts that blatant threat cues have a more negative effect on performance than subtle threat cues, whereas an {"}additive{"} model predicts that both cues combine to have a greater negative effect than either threat cue alone. However, a {"}dual process{"} model predicts that each threat cue has an independent negative influence through separate mechanisms. To test these predictions, we varied the presence of blatant (e.g., the task frame) and subtle cues (e.g., the gender of the experimenter) for negative stereotypes about female athletes, and then measured both the number of strokes required to finish the course and accuracy on the last putt of each hole. The results supported the dual process model prediction: females required more strokes to finish the golf task when it was framed as measuring gender differences compared to racial differences in athletic ability, and females performed less accurately on the last putt of each hole in the presence of a male versus a female experimenter. The discussion focuses on how the presence of multiple stereotype threat cues can induce independent mechanisms that may have separate but simultaneously deleterious effects on performance.",
keywords = "Athlete, Dual process, Female, Sports, Stereotype threat",
author = "Stone, {Jeffrey A} and Chad McWhinnie",
year = "2008",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.jesp.2007.02.006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "445--452",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-1031",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evidence that blatant versus subtle stereotype threat cues impact performance through dual processes

AU - Stone, Jeffrey A

AU - McWhinnie, Chad

PY - 2008/3

Y1 - 2008/3

N2 - An experiment tested three competing hypotheses for how blatant and subtle stereotype threat cues influence the performance of female sports participants on a golf-putting task. A "predominant" model predicts that blatant threat cues have a more negative effect on performance than subtle threat cues, whereas an "additive" model predicts that both cues combine to have a greater negative effect than either threat cue alone. However, a "dual process" model predicts that each threat cue has an independent negative influence through separate mechanisms. To test these predictions, we varied the presence of blatant (e.g., the task frame) and subtle cues (e.g., the gender of the experimenter) for negative stereotypes about female athletes, and then measured both the number of strokes required to finish the course and accuracy on the last putt of each hole. The results supported the dual process model prediction: females required more strokes to finish the golf task when it was framed as measuring gender differences compared to racial differences in athletic ability, and females performed less accurately on the last putt of each hole in the presence of a male versus a female experimenter. The discussion focuses on how the presence of multiple stereotype threat cues can induce independent mechanisms that may have separate but simultaneously deleterious effects on performance.

AB - An experiment tested three competing hypotheses for how blatant and subtle stereotype threat cues influence the performance of female sports participants on a golf-putting task. A "predominant" model predicts that blatant threat cues have a more negative effect on performance than subtle threat cues, whereas an "additive" model predicts that both cues combine to have a greater negative effect than either threat cue alone. However, a "dual process" model predicts that each threat cue has an independent negative influence through separate mechanisms. To test these predictions, we varied the presence of blatant (e.g., the task frame) and subtle cues (e.g., the gender of the experimenter) for negative stereotypes about female athletes, and then measured both the number of strokes required to finish the course and accuracy on the last putt of each hole. The results supported the dual process model prediction: females required more strokes to finish the golf task when it was framed as measuring gender differences compared to racial differences in athletic ability, and females performed less accurately on the last putt of each hole in the presence of a male versus a female experimenter. The discussion focuses on how the presence of multiple stereotype threat cues can induce independent mechanisms that may have separate but simultaneously deleterious effects on performance.

KW - Athlete

KW - Dual process

KW - Female

KW - Sports

KW - Stereotype threat

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38849125006&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38849125006&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jesp.2007.02.006

DO - 10.1016/j.jesp.2007.02.006

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:38849125006

VL - 44

SP - 445

EP - 452

JO - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

SN - 0022-1031

IS - 2

ER -