Evidence that projection of a feared trait can serve a defensive function

Jeff Schimel, Jeff L Greenberg, Andy Martens

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two experiments tested the notion that allowing people to project a feared trait onto another individual would facilitate denial of the trait. In Study 1, participants were given feedback that they were high or low in repressed anger and were allowed to rate an ambiguous target on anger or not. Participants who received high (vs. low) anger feedback rated the target especially high on anger. In addition, participants who received high anger feedback and who were allowed to project their anger had the lowest anger accessibility on a word completion exercise. Study 2 replicated these basic findings using a different trait dimension (dishonesty) and a direct measure of denial (self-attributions of dishonesty). Specifically, in Study 2, participants who received high dishonesty feedback and who were allowed to project dishonesty reported having an especially low level of dishonesty. Discussion focused on the relationship between classic projection and other forms of psychological defense.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)969-979
Number of pages11
JournalPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Volume29
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2003

Fingerprint

Anger
Projection
Psychology

Keywords

  • Accessibility
  • Defenses
  • Projection
  • Repression
  • Self-esteem
  • Threat

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Evidence that projection of a feared trait can serve a defensive function. / Schimel, Jeff; Greenberg, Jeff L; Martens, Andy.

In: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 29, No. 8, 08.2003, p. 969-979.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fd0f2e12e8b6429a81eb9ebc55bc6115,
title = "Evidence that projection of a feared trait can serve a defensive function",
abstract = "Two experiments tested the notion that allowing people to project a feared trait onto another individual would facilitate denial of the trait. In Study 1, participants were given feedback that they were high or low in repressed anger and were allowed to rate an ambiguous target on anger or not. Participants who received high (vs. low) anger feedback rated the target especially high on anger. In addition, participants who received high anger feedback and who were allowed to project their anger had the lowest anger accessibility on a word completion exercise. Study 2 replicated these basic findings using a different trait dimension (dishonesty) and a direct measure of denial (self-attributions of dishonesty). Specifically, in Study 2, participants who received high dishonesty feedback and who were allowed to project dishonesty reported having an especially low level of dishonesty. Discussion focused on the relationship between classic projection and other forms of psychological defense.",
keywords = "Accessibility, Defenses, Projection, Repression, Self-esteem, Threat",
author = "Jeff Schimel and Greenberg, {Jeff L} and Andy Martens",
year = "2003",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1177/0146167203252969",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "969--979",
journal = "Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin",
issn = "0146-1672",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evidence that projection of a feared trait can serve a defensive function

AU - Schimel, Jeff

AU - Greenberg, Jeff L

AU - Martens, Andy

PY - 2003/8

Y1 - 2003/8

N2 - Two experiments tested the notion that allowing people to project a feared trait onto another individual would facilitate denial of the trait. In Study 1, participants were given feedback that they were high or low in repressed anger and were allowed to rate an ambiguous target on anger or not. Participants who received high (vs. low) anger feedback rated the target especially high on anger. In addition, participants who received high anger feedback and who were allowed to project their anger had the lowest anger accessibility on a word completion exercise. Study 2 replicated these basic findings using a different trait dimension (dishonesty) and a direct measure of denial (self-attributions of dishonesty). Specifically, in Study 2, participants who received high dishonesty feedback and who were allowed to project dishonesty reported having an especially low level of dishonesty. Discussion focused on the relationship between classic projection and other forms of psychological defense.

AB - Two experiments tested the notion that allowing people to project a feared trait onto another individual would facilitate denial of the trait. In Study 1, participants were given feedback that they were high or low in repressed anger and were allowed to rate an ambiguous target on anger or not. Participants who received high (vs. low) anger feedback rated the target especially high on anger. In addition, participants who received high anger feedback and who were allowed to project their anger had the lowest anger accessibility on a word completion exercise. Study 2 replicated these basic findings using a different trait dimension (dishonesty) and a direct measure of denial (self-attributions of dishonesty). Specifically, in Study 2, participants who received high dishonesty feedback and who were allowed to project dishonesty reported having an especially low level of dishonesty. Discussion focused on the relationship between classic projection and other forms of psychological defense.

KW - Accessibility

KW - Defenses

KW - Projection

KW - Repression

KW - Self-esteem

KW - Threat

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0042208142&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0042208142&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0146167203252969

DO - 10.1177/0146167203252969

M3 - Article

C2 - 15189616

AN - SCOPUS:0042208142

VL - 29

SP - 969

EP - 979

JO - Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

JF - Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

SN - 0146-1672

IS - 8

ER -