Evolution of sexual size dimorphisms in emydid turtles: Ecological dimorphism, rensch's rule, and sympatric divergence

Patrick R. Stephens, John J Wiens

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

76 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The origin of sexual size dimorphisms (SSD) has long been a central topic in evolutionary biology. However, there is little agreement as to which factors are most important in driving the evolution of SSD, and several hypotheses concerning SSD evolution have never been tested empirically. Emydid turtles include species with both male and female-biased SSD, and some emydids exhibit among the most extreme SSD in tetrapods. Here, we use a comparative phylogenetic approach in emydids to analyze the origins of SSD and test several hypotheses for the evolution of SSD, some for the first time. We test the Fairbairn-Preziosi hypothesis for the origin of Rensch's rule, and support it in lineages with male-biased SSD but not those with female-biased SSD. We also find support for the secondary ecological dimorphism hypothesis, which proposes that selection for ecological divergence between sexes exaggerates preexisting SSD. Finally, we find only equivocal support for the Bolnick-Doebeli hypothesis, which relates intersexual ecological divergence to interspecific ecological divergence. Our results also illustrate how global analyses of SSD may mislead in groups in which the factors that drive the evolution of SSD vary among clades.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)910-925
Number of pages16
JournalEvolution
Volume63
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Turtles
dimorphism
turtle
Sex Characteristics
turtles
divergence
tetrapod
evolutionary biology

Keywords

  • Comparative methods
  • Emydidae
  • Phylogeny
  • Sexual size dimorphism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Genetics

Cite this

Evolution of sexual size dimorphisms in emydid turtles : Ecological dimorphism, rensch's rule, and sympatric divergence. / Stephens, Patrick R.; Wiens, John J.

In: Evolution, Vol. 63, No. 4, 04.2009, p. 910-925.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e8903fa4fc924a61a0d85b8a30ea5178,
title = "Evolution of sexual size dimorphisms in emydid turtles: Ecological dimorphism, rensch's rule, and sympatric divergence",
abstract = "The origin of sexual size dimorphisms (SSD) has long been a central topic in evolutionary biology. However, there is little agreement as to which factors are most important in driving the evolution of SSD, and several hypotheses concerning SSD evolution have never been tested empirically. Emydid turtles include species with both male and female-biased SSD, and some emydids exhibit among the most extreme SSD in tetrapods. Here, we use a comparative phylogenetic approach in emydids to analyze the origins of SSD and test several hypotheses for the evolution of SSD, some for the first time. We test the Fairbairn-Preziosi hypothesis for the origin of Rensch's rule, and support it in lineages with male-biased SSD but not those with female-biased SSD. We also find support for the secondary ecological dimorphism hypothesis, which proposes that selection for ecological divergence between sexes exaggerates preexisting SSD. Finally, we find only equivocal support for the Bolnick-Doebeli hypothesis, which relates intersexual ecological divergence to interspecific ecological divergence. Our results also illustrate how global analyses of SSD may mislead in groups in which the factors that drive the evolution of SSD vary among clades.",
keywords = "Comparative methods, Emydidae, Phylogeny, Sexual size dimorphism",
author = "Stephens, {Patrick R.} and Wiens, {John J}",
year = "2009",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00597.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "63",
pages = "910--925",
journal = "Evolution; international journal of organic evolution",
issn = "0014-3820",
publisher = "Society for the Study of Evolution",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evolution of sexual size dimorphisms in emydid turtles

T2 - Ecological dimorphism, rensch's rule, and sympatric divergence

AU - Stephens, Patrick R.

AU - Wiens, John J

PY - 2009/4

Y1 - 2009/4

N2 - The origin of sexual size dimorphisms (SSD) has long been a central topic in evolutionary biology. However, there is little agreement as to which factors are most important in driving the evolution of SSD, and several hypotheses concerning SSD evolution have never been tested empirically. Emydid turtles include species with both male and female-biased SSD, and some emydids exhibit among the most extreme SSD in tetrapods. Here, we use a comparative phylogenetic approach in emydids to analyze the origins of SSD and test several hypotheses for the evolution of SSD, some for the first time. We test the Fairbairn-Preziosi hypothesis for the origin of Rensch's rule, and support it in lineages with male-biased SSD but not those with female-biased SSD. We also find support for the secondary ecological dimorphism hypothesis, which proposes that selection for ecological divergence between sexes exaggerates preexisting SSD. Finally, we find only equivocal support for the Bolnick-Doebeli hypothesis, which relates intersexual ecological divergence to interspecific ecological divergence. Our results also illustrate how global analyses of SSD may mislead in groups in which the factors that drive the evolution of SSD vary among clades.

AB - The origin of sexual size dimorphisms (SSD) has long been a central topic in evolutionary biology. However, there is little agreement as to which factors are most important in driving the evolution of SSD, and several hypotheses concerning SSD evolution have never been tested empirically. Emydid turtles include species with both male and female-biased SSD, and some emydids exhibit among the most extreme SSD in tetrapods. Here, we use a comparative phylogenetic approach in emydids to analyze the origins of SSD and test several hypotheses for the evolution of SSD, some for the first time. We test the Fairbairn-Preziosi hypothesis for the origin of Rensch's rule, and support it in lineages with male-biased SSD but not those with female-biased SSD. We also find support for the secondary ecological dimorphism hypothesis, which proposes that selection for ecological divergence between sexes exaggerates preexisting SSD. Finally, we find only equivocal support for the Bolnick-Doebeli hypothesis, which relates intersexual ecological divergence to interspecific ecological divergence. Our results also illustrate how global analyses of SSD may mislead in groups in which the factors that drive the evolution of SSD vary among clades.

KW - Comparative methods

KW - Emydidae

KW - Phylogeny

KW - Sexual size dimorphism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=63049097278&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=63049097278&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00597.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00597.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 19210531

AN - SCOPUS:63049097278

VL - 63

SP - 910

EP - 925

JO - Evolution; international journal of organic evolution

JF - Evolution; international journal of organic evolution

SN - 0014-3820

IS - 4

ER -