Examining the asymmetrical effects of goal faultlines in groups: A categorization-elaboration approach

Aleksander P J Ellis, Ke Michael Mai, Jessica Siegel Christian

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to use the categorization-elaboration model (CEM) to examine the asymmetrical effects of goal faultlines in groups, which are present when hypothetical dividing lines are created on the basis of different performance goals, splitting the group into subgroups. On the basis of the CEM, we expected groups with goal faultlines to exhibit higher levels of creative task performance than (a) groups with specific, difficult goals and (b) groups with do-your-best goals. We expected the benefits of goal faultlines to be due to increases in reflective reframing, which occurs when group members build on each other's ideas by shifting to alternate frames. However, we expected groups with goal faultlines to exhibit lower levels of routine task performance than (a) groups with do-your-best goals and (b) groups with specific, difficult goals, due to increased perceptions of loafing. Results from 87 groups generally supported our hypothesized model. Implications are discussed as well as possible limitations and directions for future research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)948-961
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Applied Psychology
Volume98
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2013

Fingerprint

Task Performance and Analysis
Direction compound

Keywords

  • Faultlines
  • Goal-setting
  • Groups

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

Examining the asymmetrical effects of goal faultlines in groups : A categorization-elaboration approach. / Ellis, Aleksander P J; Mai, Ke Michael; Christian, Jessica Siegel.

In: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 98, No. 6, 11.2013, p. 948-961.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b798068d5a0d4ffdb5feb8a2b6463b6b,
title = "Examining the asymmetrical effects of goal faultlines in groups: A categorization-elaboration approach",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to use the categorization-elaboration model (CEM) to examine the asymmetrical effects of goal faultlines in groups, which are present when hypothetical dividing lines are created on the basis of different performance goals, splitting the group into subgroups. On the basis of the CEM, we expected groups with goal faultlines to exhibit higher levels of creative task performance than (a) groups with specific, difficult goals and (b) groups with do-your-best goals. We expected the benefits of goal faultlines to be due to increases in reflective reframing, which occurs when group members build on each other's ideas by shifting to alternate frames. However, we expected groups with goal faultlines to exhibit lower levels of routine task performance than (a) groups with do-your-best goals and (b) groups with specific, difficult goals, due to increased perceptions of loafing. Results from 87 groups generally supported our hypothesized model. Implications are discussed as well as possible limitations and directions for future research.",
keywords = "Faultlines, Goal-setting, Groups",
author = "Ellis, {Aleksander P J} and Mai, {Ke Michael} and Christian, {Jessica Siegel}",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1037/a0033725",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "98",
pages = "948--961",
journal = "Journal of Applied Psychology",
issn = "0021-9010",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Examining the asymmetrical effects of goal faultlines in groups

T2 - A categorization-elaboration approach

AU - Ellis, Aleksander P J

AU - Mai, Ke Michael

AU - Christian, Jessica Siegel

PY - 2013/11

Y1 - 2013/11

N2 - The purpose of this study was to use the categorization-elaboration model (CEM) to examine the asymmetrical effects of goal faultlines in groups, which are present when hypothetical dividing lines are created on the basis of different performance goals, splitting the group into subgroups. On the basis of the CEM, we expected groups with goal faultlines to exhibit higher levels of creative task performance than (a) groups with specific, difficult goals and (b) groups with do-your-best goals. We expected the benefits of goal faultlines to be due to increases in reflective reframing, which occurs when group members build on each other's ideas by shifting to alternate frames. However, we expected groups with goal faultlines to exhibit lower levels of routine task performance than (a) groups with do-your-best goals and (b) groups with specific, difficult goals, due to increased perceptions of loafing. Results from 87 groups generally supported our hypothesized model. Implications are discussed as well as possible limitations and directions for future research.

AB - The purpose of this study was to use the categorization-elaboration model (CEM) to examine the asymmetrical effects of goal faultlines in groups, which are present when hypothetical dividing lines are created on the basis of different performance goals, splitting the group into subgroups. On the basis of the CEM, we expected groups with goal faultlines to exhibit higher levels of creative task performance than (a) groups with specific, difficult goals and (b) groups with do-your-best goals. We expected the benefits of goal faultlines to be due to increases in reflective reframing, which occurs when group members build on each other's ideas by shifting to alternate frames. However, we expected groups with goal faultlines to exhibit lower levels of routine task performance than (a) groups with do-your-best goals and (b) groups with specific, difficult goals, due to increased perceptions of loafing. Results from 87 groups generally supported our hypothesized model. Implications are discussed as well as possible limitations and directions for future research.

KW - Faultlines

KW - Goal-setting

KW - Groups

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84887914345&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84887914345&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0033725

DO - 10.1037/a0033725

M3 - Article

C2 - 23855916

AN - SCOPUS:84887914345

VL - 98

SP - 948

EP - 961

JO - Journal of Applied Psychology

JF - Journal of Applied Psychology

SN - 0021-9010

IS - 6

ER -