Examining the “Blanket of Protection” Conferred by Inoculation: The Effects of Inoculation Messages on the Cross-protection of Related Attitudes

Kimberly A. Parker, Stephen A Rains, Bobi Ivanov

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although the effectiveness of inoculation as a strategy for promoting resistance to attitude change is fairly well established, the potential of inoculation messages to offer cross-protection for related, but untreated, attitudes warrants additional attention from scholars. The reported study tested the “blanket of protection” conferred by inoculation. Participants (N = 118) were randomly assigned to read an inoculation message addressing a target topic and subsequently had their attitudes toward three related, but untreated, topics attacked. The results offer some evidence that inoculation messages can confer cross-protection for related attitudes. Participants in the inoculation condition reported greater perceptions of threat, greater counterarguing, and less attitude change in response to attacks than participants in the control condition for two of the three untreated topics. Counterarguing in response to attacks on untreated attitudes appears to be primarily responsible for cross-protection.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)49-68
Number of pages20
JournalCommunication Monographs
Volume83
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2 2016

Fingerprint

attitude change
threat
Blanket
Inoculation
evidence
Attack
Attitude Change

Keywords

  • Attitude Change
  • Attitudes
  • Inoculation Theory
  • Message Sidedness
  • Persuasion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication
  • Language and Linguistics

Cite this

Examining the “Blanket of Protection” Conferred by Inoculation : The Effects of Inoculation Messages on the Cross-protection of Related Attitudes. / Parker, Kimberly A.; Rains, Stephen A; Ivanov, Bobi.

In: Communication Monographs, Vol. 83, No. 1, 02.01.2016, p. 49-68.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f23727c944a3429eaace1523c34b5431,
title = "Examining the “Blanket of Protection” Conferred by Inoculation: The Effects of Inoculation Messages on the Cross-protection of Related Attitudes",
abstract = "Although the effectiveness of inoculation as a strategy for promoting resistance to attitude change is fairly well established, the potential of inoculation messages to offer cross-protection for related, but untreated, attitudes warrants additional attention from scholars. The reported study tested the “blanket of protection” conferred by inoculation. Participants (N = 118) were randomly assigned to read an inoculation message addressing a target topic and subsequently had their attitudes toward three related, but untreated, topics attacked. The results offer some evidence that inoculation messages can confer cross-protection for related attitudes. Participants in the inoculation condition reported greater perceptions of threat, greater counterarguing, and less attitude change in response to attacks than participants in the control condition for two of the three untreated topics. Counterarguing in response to attacks on untreated attitudes appears to be primarily responsible for cross-protection.",
keywords = "Attitude Change, Attitudes, Inoculation Theory, Message Sidedness, Persuasion",
author = "Parker, {Kimberly A.} and Rains, {Stephen A} and Bobi Ivanov",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/03637751.2015.1030681",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "83",
pages = "49--68",
journal = "Communication Monographs",
issn = "0363-7751",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Examining the “Blanket of Protection” Conferred by Inoculation

T2 - The Effects of Inoculation Messages on the Cross-protection of Related Attitudes

AU - Parker, Kimberly A.

AU - Rains, Stephen A

AU - Ivanov, Bobi

PY - 2016/1/2

Y1 - 2016/1/2

N2 - Although the effectiveness of inoculation as a strategy for promoting resistance to attitude change is fairly well established, the potential of inoculation messages to offer cross-protection for related, but untreated, attitudes warrants additional attention from scholars. The reported study tested the “blanket of protection” conferred by inoculation. Participants (N = 118) were randomly assigned to read an inoculation message addressing a target topic and subsequently had their attitudes toward three related, but untreated, topics attacked. The results offer some evidence that inoculation messages can confer cross-protection for related attitudes. Participants in the inoculation condition reported greater perceptions of threat, greater counterarguing, and less attitude change in response to attacks than participants in the control condition for two of the three untreated topics. Counterarguing in response to attacks on untreated attitudes appears to be primarily responsible for cross-protection.

AB - Although the effectiveness of inoculation as a strategy for promoting resistance to attitude change is fairly well established, the potential of inoculation messages to offer cross-protection for related, but untreated, attitudes warrants additional attention from scholars. The reported study tested the “blanket of protection” conferred by inoculation. Participants (N = 118) were randomly assigned to read an inoculation message addressing a target topic and subsequently had their attitudes toward three related, but untreated, topics attacked. The results offer some evidence that inoculation messages can confer cross-protection for related attitudes. Participants in the inoculation condition reported greater perceptions of threat, greater counterarguing, and less attitude change in response to attacks than participants in the control condition for two of the three untreated topics. Counterarguing in response to attacks on untreated attitudes appears to be primarily responsible for cross-protection.

KW - Attitude Change

KW - Attitudes

KW - Inoculation Theory

KW - Message Sidedness

KW - Persuasion

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84957847950&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84957847950&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/03637751.2015.1030681

DO - 10.1080/03637751.2015.1030681

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84957847950

VL - 83

SP - 49

EP - 68

JO - Communication Monographs

JF - Communication Monographs

SN - 0363-7751

IS - 1

ER -