Exit Tales

How Precarious Workers Navigate Bad Jobs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Why do some workers quit undignified “bad jobs,” while others persist in them? We know a great deal about how people find employment, along with what they do at work. But we have few studies documenting the lived experience of quitting a bad job. Recent structural transformations, such as the demise of Fordism and the curtailment of welfare, have surely recalibrated the strategies by which precarious individuals navigate the labor market. This article, an ethnography that follows a single cohort of call center employees over nine months, documents four main pathways through which such workers leave versus stay in their jobs. It argues that the emergent class of precarious workers is not homogenous. Gender, race, and age intersect with class to shape how one experiences a given bad job.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)573-599
Number of pages27
JournalJournal of Contemporary Ethnography
Volume46
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2017

Fingerprint

call center
Fordism
labor market
gender
worker
fordism
ethnography
experience
welfare
employee
document
Exit
Workers

Keywords

  • job quality
  • poverty
  • turnover
  • unemployment
  • work

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Anthropology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Urban Studies

Cite this

Exit Tales : How Precarious Workers Navigate Bad Jobs. / Sallaz, Jeffrey J.

In: Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, Vol. 46, No. 5, 01.10.2017, p. 573-599.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0a88d12c04cb4282b982b1dea24e0e32,
title = "Exit Tales: How Precarious Workers Navigate Bad Jobs",
abstract = "Why do some workers quit undignified “bad jobs,” while others persist in them? We know a great deal about how people find employment, along with what they do at work. But we have few studies documenting the lived experience of quitting a bad job. Recent structural transformations, such as the demise of Fordism and the curtailment of welfare, have surely recalibrated the strategies by which precarious individuals navigate the labor market. This article, an ethnography that follows a single cohort of call center employees over nine months, documents four main pathways through which such workers leave versus stay in their jobs. It argues that the emergent class of precarious workers is not homogenous. Gender, race, and age intersect with class to shape how one experiences a given bad job.",
keywords = "job quality, poverty, turnover, unemployment, work",
author = "Sallaz, {Jeffrey J}",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0891241615625458",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "46",
pages = "573--599",
journal = "Journal of Contemporary Ethnography",
issn = "0891-2416",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exit Tales

T2 - How Precarious Workers Navigate Bad Jobs

AU - Sallaz, Jeffrey J

PY - 2017/10/1

Y1 - 2017/10/1

N2 - Why do some workers quit undignified “bad jobs,” while others persist in them? We know a great deal about how people find employment, along with what they do at work. But we have few studies documenting the lived experience of quitting a bad job. Recent structural transformations, such as the demise of Fordism and the curtailment of welfare, have surely recalibrated the strategies by which precarious individuals navigate the labor market. This article, an ethnography that follows a single cohort of call center employees over nine months, documents four main pathways through which such workers leave versus stay in their jobs. It argues that the emergent class of precarious workers is not homogenous. Gender, race, and age intersect with class to shape how one experiences a given bad job.

AB - Why do some workers quit undignified “bad jobs,” while others persist in them? We know a great deal about how people find employment, along with what they do at work. But we have few studies documenting the lived experience of quitting a bad job. Recent structural transformations, such as the demise of Fordism and the curtailment of welfare, have surely recalibrated the strategies by which precarious individuals navigate the labor market. This article, an ethnography that follows a single cohort of call center employees over nine months, documents four main pathways through which such workers leave versus stay in their jobs. It argues that the emergent class of precarious workers is not homogenous. Gender, race, and age intersect with class to shape how one experiences a given bad job.

KW - job quality

KW - poverty

KW - turnover

KW - unemployment

KW - work

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028980209&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85028980209&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0891241615625458

DO - 10.1177/0891241615625458

M3 - Article

VL - 46

SP - 573

EP - 599

JO - Journal of Contemporary Ethnography

JF - Journal of Contemporary Ethnography

SN - 0891-2416

IS - 5

ER -