Expectancy factors in the treatment of fear: Methodological and theoretical issues

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

94 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Critically reviews the literature assessing the importance of Ss' expectation of therapeutic gain in facilitating fear reduction. Reviewed studies fall into 2 major categories: those that compare the relative efficacy of systematic desensitization and placebos and those that attempt to manipulate Ss' expectation of therapeutic gain within a particular technique (e.g., systematic desensitization). The methodological problems with this research include the failure of investigators to evaluate the experiential impact of expectancy-inducing instructions, the use of unconvincing placebo manipulations, and the predominant employment of mildly fearful, poorly motivated Ss. In spite of these problems, it is tentatively concluded that expectancy manipulations are important change mediators. Several mechanisms may explain how expectancy mediates change, including increased compliance with real treatment procedures; increased tendency to test reality after having undergone an "effective" therapy, with subsequent fear extinction and self-reinforcement for behavioral improvement; modification of demand characteristics after treatment; and modification of cognitive events controlling fear responding. (71 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)917-931
Number of pages15
JournalPsychological Bulletin
Volume82
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1975
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Fear
Placebos
Therapeutics
Research Personnel
Expectancy
Research
Placebo
Desensitization
Manipulation
Psychologic Desensitization
Extinction
Mediator
Methodological Problems
Therapy
Reinforcement
Efficacy

Keywords

  • expectation of therapeutic gain, facilitation of fear reduction, critical review of literature

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Cite this

Expectancy factors in the treatment of fear : Methodological and theoretical issues. / Lick, John; Bootzin, Richard R.

In: Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 82, No. 6, 11.1975, p. 917-931.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e2f9d80c73074851891e5d468f46d933,
title = "Expectancy factors in the treatment of fear: Methodological and theoretical issues",
abstract = "Critically reviews the literature assessing the importance of Ss' expectation of therapeutic gain in facilitating fear reduction. Reviewed studies fall into 2 major categories: those that compare the relative efficacy of systematic desensitization and placebos and those that attempt to manipulate Ss' expectation of therapeutic gain within a particular technique (e.g., systematic desensitization). The methodological problems with this research include the failure of investigators to evaluate the experiential impact of expectancy-inducing instructions, the use of unconvincing placebo manipulations, and the predominant employment of mildly fearful, poorly motivated Ss. In spite of these problems, it is tentatively concluded that expectancy manipulations are important change mediators. Several mechanisms may explain how expectancy mediates change, including increased compliance with real treatment procedures; increased tendency to test reality after having undergone an {"}effective{"} therapy, with subsequent fear extinction and self-reinforcement for behavioral improvement; modification of demand characteristics after treatment; and modification of cognitive events controlling fear responding. (71 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).",
keywords = "expectation of therapeutic gain, facilitation of fear reduction, critical review of literature",
author = "John Lick and Bootzin, {Richard R}",
year = "1975",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1037/0033-2909.82.6.917",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "82",
pages = "917--931",
journal = "Psychological Bulletin",
issn = "0033-2909",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Expectancy factors in the treatment of fear

T2 - Methodological and theoretical issues

AU - Lick, John

AU - Bootzin, Richard R

PY - 1975/11

Y1 - 1975/11

N2 - Critically reviews the literature assessing the importance of Ss' expectation of therapeutic gain in facilitating fear reduction. Reviewed studies fall into 2 major categories: those that compare the relative efficacy of systematic desensitization and placebos and those that attempt to manipulate Ss' expectation of therapeutic gain within a particular technique (e.g., systematic desensitization). The methodological problems with this research include the failure of investigators to evaluate the experiential impact of expectancy-inducing instructions, the use of unconvincing placebo manipulations, and the predominant employment of mildly fearful, poorly motivated Ss. In spite of these problems, it is tentatively concluded that expectancy manipulations are important change mediators. Several mechanisms may explain how expectancy mediates change, including increased compliance with real treatment procedures; increased tendency to test reality after having undergone an "effective" therapy, with subsequent fear extinction and self-reinforcement for behavioral improvement; modification of demand characteristics after treatment; and modification of cognitive events controlling fear responding. (71 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

AB - Critically reviews the literature assessing the importance of Ss' expectation of therapeutic gain in facilitating fear reduction. Reviewed studies fall into 2 major categories: those that compare the relative efficacy of systematic desensitization and placebos and those that attempt to manipulate Ss' expectation of therapeutic gain within a particular technique (e.g., systematic desensitization). The methodological problems with this research include the failure of investigators to evaluate the experiential impact of expectancy-inducing instructions, the use of unconvincing placebo manipulations, and the predominant employment of mildly fearful, poorly motivated Ss. In spite of these problems, it is tentatively concluded that expectancy manipulations are important change mediators. Several mechanisms may explain how expectancy mediates change, including increased compliance with real treatment procedures; increased tendency to test reality after having undergone an "effective" therapy, with subsequent fear extinction and self-reinforcement for behavioral improvement; modification of demand characteristics after treatment; and modification of cognitive events controlling fear responding. (71 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

KW - expectation of therapeutic gain, facilitation of fear reduction, critical review of literature

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0016570453&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0016570453&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0033-2909.82.6.917

DO - 10.1037/0033-2909.82.6.917

M3 - Article

C2 - 242026

AN - SCOPUS:0016570453

VL - 82

SP - 917

EP - 931

JO - Psychological Bulletin

JF - Psychological Bulletin

SN - 0033-2909

IS - 6

ER -