Expectation confirmation in information systems research

A test of six competing models

Susan A Brown, Viswanath Venkatesh, Sandeep Goyal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

55 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Expectation confirmation research in general, and in information systems (IS) in particular, has produced conflicting results. In this paper, we discuss six different models of expectation confirmation: assimilation, contrast, generalized negativity, assimilation-contrast, experiences only, and expectations only. Relying on key constructs from the technology acceptance model (TAM), we test each of these six models that suggests different roles for expectations and experiences of the key predictor-here, perceived usefulness- and their impacts on key outcomes-here, behavioral intention, use, and satisfaction. Data were collected in a field study from 1,113 participants at two points in time. Using polynomial modeling and response surface analysis, we provide the analytical representations for each of the six models and empirically test them to demonstrate that the assimilation-contrast is the best existing model in terms of its ability to explain the relationships between expectations and experiences of perceived usefulness and important dependent variables-namely, behavioral intention, use, and satisfaction-in individual-level research on IS implementations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)729-756
Number of pages28
JournalMIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems
Volume38
Issue number3
StatePublished - Sep 1 2014

Fingerprint

Information systems
Surface analysis
Information systems research
Polynomials
Perceived usefulness
Behavioral intention

Keywords

  • Disconfirmation
  • Expectations
  • Polynomial modeling
  • Response surface analysis
  • Software use

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Science Applications
  • Information Systems
  • Information Systems and Management
  • Management Information Systems

Cite this

Expectation confirmation in information systems research : A test of six competing models. / Brown, Susan A; Venkatesh, Viswanath; Goyal, Sandeep.

In: MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, Vol. 38, No. 3, 01.09.2014, p. 729-756.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7cc6947610a949938827cd58b3bb7fac,
title = "Expectation confirmation in information systems research: A test of six competing models",
abstract = "Expectation confirmation research in general, and in information systems (IS) in particular, has produced conflicting results. In this paper, we discuss six different models of expectation confirmation: assimilation, contrast, generalized negativity, assimilation-contrast, experiences only, and expectations only. Relying on key constructs from the technology acceptance model (TAM), we test each of these six models that suggests different roles for expectations and experiences of the key predictor-here, perceived usefulness- and their impacts on key outcomes-here, behavioral intention, use, and satisfaction. Data were collected in a field study from 1,113 participants at two points in time. Using polynomial modeling and response surface analysis, we provide the analytical representations for each of the six models and empirically test them to demonstrate that the assimilation-contrast is the best existing model in terms of its ability to explain the relationships between expectations and experiences of perceived usefulness and important dependent variables-namely, behavioral intention, use, and satisfaction-in individual-level research on IS implementations.",
keywords = "Disconfirmation, Expectations, Polynomial modeling, Response surface analysis, Software use",
author = "Brown, {Susan A} and Viswanath Venkatesh and Sandeep Goyal",
year = "2014",
month = "9",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "729--756",
journal = "MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems",
issn = "0276-7783",
publisher = "Management Information Systems Research Center",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Expectation confirmation in information systems research

T2 - A test of six competing models

AU - Brown, Susan A

AU - Venkatesh, Viswanath

AU - Goyal, Sandeep

PY - 2014/9/1

Y1 - 2014/9/1

N2 - Expectation confirmation research in general, and in information systems (IS) in particular, has produced conflicting results. In this paper, we discuss six different models of expectation confirmation: assimilation, contrast, generalized negativity, assimilation-contrast, experiences only, and expectations only. Relying on key constructs from the technology acceptance model (TAM), we test each of these six models that suggests different roles for expectations and experiences of the key predictor-here, perceived usefulness- and their impacts on key outcomes-here, behavioral intention, use, and satisfaction. Data were collected in a field study from 1,113 participants at two points in time. Using polynomial modeling and response surface analysis, we provide the analytical representations for each of the six models and empirically test them to demonstrate that the assimilation-contrast is the best existing model in terms of its ability to explain the relationships between expectations and experiences of perceived usefulness and important dependent variables-namely, behavioral intention, use, and satisfaction-in individual-level research on IS implementations.

AB - Expectation confirmation research in general, and in information systems (IS) in particular, has produced conflicting results. In this paper, we discuss six different models of expectation confirmation: assimilation, contrast, generalized negativity, assimilation-contrast, experiences only, and expectations only. Relying on key constructs from the technology acceptance model (TAM), we test each of these six models that suggests different roles for expectations and experiences of the key predictor-here, perceived usefulness- and their impacts on key outcomes-here, behavioral intention, use, and satisfaction. Data were collected in a field study from 1,113 participants at two points in time. Using polynomial modeling and response surface analysis, we provide the analytical representations for each of the six models and empirically test them to demonstrate that the assimilation-contrast is the best existing model in terms of its ability to explain the relationships between expectations and experiences of perceived usefulness and important dependent variables-namely, behavioral intention, use, and satisfaction-in individual-level research on IS implementations.

KW - Disconfirmation

KW - Expectations

KW - Polynomial modeling

KW - Response surface analysis

KW - Software use

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937427047&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84937427047&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 729

EP - 756

JO - MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems

JF - MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems

SN - 0276-7783

IS - 3

ER -