Expense comparison of a telemedicine practice versus a traditional clinical practice

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

This paper compares the expenses of a telemedicine program to those of a traditional clinical practice using data from two fiscal years (FY) 1998/1999 and 2000/2001. As part of that evaluation, we compared expenses of the University of Arizona's clinical practice group, the University Physicians Incorporated (UPI), to those of the Arizona Telemedicine Program (ATP) practice. For this study, we used the reporting categories published in the year-end UPI financial statement. These categories included clinical services, administration, equipment depreciation, and overhead. Results showed that clinical service expenses and administrative expenses for FY 2000/2001 were higher in the traditional UPI practice, whereas equipment depreciation and overhead expenses are higher in the telemedicine practice. This differs somewhat from FY 1998/1999, where clinical expenses and overhead were higher in the UPI practice and administration and equipment depreciation were higher in the telemedicine practice. We will discuss the relevance of these results and the critical factors that contribute to these differences.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)376-380
Number of pages5
JournalTelemedicine Journal and e-Health
Volume10
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2004

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Informatics
  • Health Information Management

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Expense comparison of a telemedicine practice versus a traditional clinical practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this