Experience Sampling Methods: A Discussion of Critical Trends and Considerations for Scholarly Advancement

Allison S. Gabriel, Nathan P Podsakoff, Daniel J. Beal, Brent A. Scott, Sabine Sonnentag, John P. Trougakos, Marcus M. Butts

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the organizational sciences, scholars are increasingly using experience sampling methods (ESM) to answer questions tied to intraindividual, dynamic phenomenon. However, employing this method to answer organizational research questions comes with a number of complex—and often difficult—decisions surrounding: (1) how the implementation of ESM can advance or elucidate prior between-person theorizing at the within-person level of analysis, (2) how scholars should effectively and efficiently assess within-person constructs, and (3) analytic concerns regarding the proper modeling of interdependent assessments and trends while controlling for potentially confounding factors. The current paper addresses these challenges via a panel of seven researchers who are familiar not only with implementing this methodology but also related theoretical and analytic challenges in this domain. The current paper provides timely, actionable insights aimed toward addressing several complex issues that scholars often face when implementing ESM in their research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalOrganizational Research Methods
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Sampling
Sampling methods
Confounding
Factors
Levels of analysis
Methodology
Theorizing
Modeling
Organizational research

Keywords

  • common method variance
  • experience sampling methods
  • homology
  • isomorphism
  • multilevel theory and analysis
  • validation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Decision Sciences(all)
  • Strategy and Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Cite this

Experience Sampling Methods : A Discussion of Critical Trends and Considerations for Scholarly Advancement. / Gabriel, Allison S.; Podsakoff, Nathan P; Beal, Daniel J.; Scott, Brent A.; Sonnentag, Sabine; Trougakos, John P.; Butts, Marcus M.

In: Organizational Research Methods, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gabriel, Allison S. ; Podsakoff, Nathan P ; Beal, Daniel J. ; Scott, Brent A. ; Sonnentag, Sabine ; Trougakos, John P. ; Butts, Marcus M. / Experience Sampling Methods : A Discussion of Critical Trends and Considerations for Scholarly Advancement. In: Organizational Research Methods. 2018.
@article{fba35b8440374f7986e042d6ed6e0ae5,
title = "Experience Sampling Methods: A Discussion of Critical Trends and Considerations for Scholarly Advancement",
abstract = "In the organizational sciences, scholars are increasingly using experience sampling methods (ESM) to answer questions tied to intraindividual, dynamic phenomenon. However, employing this method to answer organizational research questions comes with a number of complex—and often difficult—decisions surrounding: (1) how the implementation of ESM can advance or elucidate prior between-person theorizing at the within-person level of analysis, (2) how scholars should effectively and efficiently assess within-person constructs, and (3) analytic concerns regarding the proper modeling of interdependent assessments and trends while controlling for potentially confounding factors. The current paper addresses these challenges via a panel of seven researchers who are familiar not only with implementing this methodology but also related theoretical and analytic challenges in this domain. The current paper provides timely, actionable insights aimed toward addressing several complex issues that scholars often face when implementing ESM in their research.",
keywords = "common method variance, experience sampling methods, homology, isomorphism, multilevel theory and analysis, validation",
author = "Gabriel, {Allison S.} and Podsakoff, {Nathan P} and Beal, {Daniel J.} and Scott, {Brent A.} and Sabine Sonnentag and Trougakos, {John P.} and Butts, {Marcus M.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1094428118802626",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Organizational Research Methods",
issn = "1094-4281",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Experience Sampling Methods

T2 - A Discussion of Critical Trends and Considerations for Scholarly Advancement

AU - Gabriel, Allison S.

AU - Podsakoff, Nathan P

AU - Beal, Daniel J.

AU - Scott, Brent A.

AU - Sonnentag, Sabine

AU - Trougakos, John P.

AU - Butts, Marcus M.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - In the organizational sciences, scholars are increasingly using experience sampling methods (ESM) to answer questions tied to intraindividual, dynamic phenomenon. However, employing this method to answer organizational research questions comes with a number of complex—and often difficult—decisions surrounding: (1) how the implementation of ESM can advance or elucidate prior between-person theorizing at the within-person level of analysis, (2) how scholars should effectively and efficiently assess within-person constructs, and (3) analytic concerns regarding the proper modeling of interdependent assessments and trends while controlling for potentially confounding factors. The current paper addresses these challenges via a panel of seven researchers who are familiar not only with implementing this methodology but also related theoretical and analytic challenges in this domain. The current paper provides timely, actionable insights aimed toward addressing several complex issues that scholars often face when implementing ESM in their research.

AB - In the organizational sciences, scholars are increasingly using experience sampling methods (ESM) to answer questions tied to intraindividual, dynamic phenomenon. However, employing this method to answer organizational research questions comes with a number of complex—and often difficult—decisions surrounding: (1) how the implementation of ESM can advance or elucidate prior between-person theorizing at the within-person level of analysis, (2) how scholars should effectively and efficiently assess within-person constructs, and (3) analytic concerns regarding the proper modeling of interdependent assessments and trends while controlling for potentially confounding factors. The current paper addresses these challenges via a panel of seven researchers who are familiar not only with implementing this methodology but also related theoretical and analytic challenges in this domain. The current paper provides timely, actionable insights aimed toward addressing several complex issues that scholars often face when implementing ESM in their research.

KW - common method variance

KW - experience sampling methods

KW - homology

KW - isomorphism

KW - multilevel theory and analysis

KW - validation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057330229&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85057330229&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1094428118802626

DO - 10.1177/1094428118802626

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85057330229

JO - Organizational Research Methods

JF - Organizational Research Methods

SN - 1094-4281

ER -