Exploring dominant types of explanations built by general chemistry students

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The central goal of our study was to explore the nature of the explanations generated by science and engineering majors with basic training in chemistry to account for the colligative properties of solutions. The work was motivated by our broader interest in the characterisation of the dominant types of explanations that science college students use to make sense of phenomena under conditions of limited time and limited explicit knowledge about a topic. Explanations were collected in written form using two different quizzes that students completed under time constraints at the end of a two-semester general chemistry course. Our study revealed that students' ability to generate causal/mechanical explanations depended on the nature of the task. In general, students were more inclined or able to generate mechanistic explanations to account for boiling-point elevation and freezing-point depression than to make sense of osmotic flow. The analysis of the types of causal explanations built by the study participants suggests that students may be biased towards some causal models or explanatory modes characterised as causal-additive and causal-static in our work. A large proportion of the students built non-causal teleological explanations to account for osmotic flow. None of the participants in our study used a dynamic model of matter as the basis for their explanations of any of the relevant phenomena; the idea of an underlying random process that is taking place at all times giving rise to emergent properties and behaviours was completely absent from their intuitive reasoning under conditions of limited time and knowledge.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2393-2412
Number of pages20
JournalInternational Journal of Science Education
Volume32
Issue number18
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2010

Fingerprint

chemistry
student
quiz
science
semester
engineering
time
ability
knowledge

Keywords

  • Assessment
  • Chemistry education
  • Colligative properties
  • Emergence
  • Explanation
  • Reasoning
  • University

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Exploring dominant types of explanations built by general chemistry students. / Talanquer, Vicente A.

In: International Journal of Science Education, Vol. 32, No. 18, 12.2010, p. 2393-2412.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3ad2c8f462154e74807a3538c6838ed9,
title = "Exploring dominant types of explanations built by general chemistry students",
abstract = "The central goal of our study was to explore the nature of the explanations generated by science and engineering majors with basic training in chemistry to account for the colligative properties of solutions. The work was motivated by our broader interest in the characterisation of the dominant types of explanations that science college students use to make sense of phenomena under conditions of limited time and limited explicit knowledge about a topic. Explanations were collected in written form using two different quizzes that students completed under time constraints at the end of a two-semester general chemistry course. Our study revealed that students' ability to generate causal/mechanical explanations depended on the nature of the task. In general, students were more inclined or able to generate mechanistic explanations to account for boiling-point elevation and freezing-point depression than to make sense of osmotic flow. The analysis of the types of causal explanations built by the study participants suggests that students may be biased towards some causal models or explanatory modes characterised as causal-additive and causal-static in our work. A large proportion of the students built non-causal teleological explanations to account for osmotic flow. None of the participants in our study used a dynamic model of matter as the basis for their explanations of any of the relevant phenomena; the idea of an underlying random process that is taking place at all times giving rise to emergent properties and behaviours was completely absent from their intuitive reasoning under conditions of limited time and knowledge.",
keywords = "Assessment, Chemistry education, Colligative properties, Emergence, Explanation, Reasoning, University",
author = "Talanquer, {Vicente A}",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1080/09500690903369662",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "2393--2412",
journal = "International Journal of Science Education",
issn = "0950-0693",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "18",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exploring dominant types of explanations built by general chemistry students

AU - Talanquer, Vicente A

PY - 2010/12

Y1 - 2010/12

N2 - The central goal of our study was to explore the nature of the explanations generated by science and engineering majors with basic training in chemistry to account for the colligative properties of solutions. The work was motivated by our broader interest in the characterisation of the dominant types of explanations that science college students use to make sense of phenomena under conditions of limited time and limited explicit knowledge about a topic. Explanations were collected in written form using two different quizzes that students completed under time constraints at the end of a two-semester general chemistry course. Our study revealed that students' ability to generate causal/mechanical explanations depended on the nature of the task. In general, students were more inclined or able to generate mechanistic explanations to account for boiling-point elevation and freezing-point depression than to make sense of osmotic flow. The analysis of the types of causal explanations built by the study participants suggests that students may be biased towards some causal models or explanatory modes characterised as causal-additive and causal-static in our work. A large proportion of the students built non-causal teleological explanations to account for osmotic flow. None of the participants in our study used a dynamic model of matter as the basis for their explanations of any of the relevant phenomena; the idea of an underlying random process that is taking place at all times giving rise to emergent properties and behaviours was completely absent from their intuitive reasoning under conditions of limited time and knowledge.

AB - The central goal of our study was to explore the nature of the explanations generated by science and engineering majors with basic training in chemistry to account for the colligative properties of solutions. The work was motivated by our broader interest in the characterisation of the dominant types of explanations that science college students use to make sense of phenomena under conditions of limited time and limited explicit knowledge about a topic. Explanations were collected in written form using two different quizzes that students completed under time constraints at the end of a two-semester general chemistry course. Our study revealed that students' ability to generate causal/mechanical explanations depended on the nature of the task. In general, students were more inclined or able to generate mechanistic explanations to account for boiling-point elevation and freezing-point depression than to make sense of osmotic flow. The analysis of the types of causal explanations built by the study participants suggests that students may be biased towards some causal models or explanatory modes characterised as causal-additive and causal-static in our work. A large proportion of the students built non-causal teleological explanations to account for osmotic flow. None of the participants in our study used a dynamic model of matter as the basis for their explanations of any of the relevant phenomena; the idea of an underlying random process that is taking place at all times giving rise to emergent properties and behaviours was completely absent from their intuitive reasoning under conditions of limited time and knowledge.

KW - Assessment

KW - Chemistry education

KW - Colligative properties

KW - Emergence

KW - Explanation

KW - Reasoning

KW - University

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78649376715&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78649376715&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09500690903369662

DO - 10.1080/09500690903369662

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:78649376715

VL - 32

SP - 2393

EP - 2412

JO - International Journal of Science Education

JF - International Journal of Science Education

SN - 0950-0693

IS - 18

ER -