Exposure assessment in the National Children's Study: Introduction

Larry L. Needham, Halûk Özkaynak, Robin M. Whyatt, Dana B. Barr, Richard Y. Wang, Luke Naeher, Gerry Akland, Tina Bahadori, Asa Bradman, Roy Fortmann, L. J Sally Liu, Maria Morandi, Mary Kay O'Rourke, Kent Thomas, James Quackenboss, P. Barry Ryan, Valerie Zartarian

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

71 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The science of exposure assessment is relatively new and evolving rapidly with the advancement of sophisticated methods for specific measurements at the picogram per gram level or lower in a variety of environmental and biologic matrices. Without this measurement capability, environmental health studies rely on questionnaires or other indirect means as the primary method to assess individual exposures. Although we use indirect methods, they are seldom used as stand-alone tools. Analyses of environmental and biologic samples have allowed us to get more precise data on exposure pathways, from sources to concentrations, to routes, to exposure, to doses. They also often allow a better estimation of the absorbed dose and its relation to potential adverse health outcomes in individuals and in populations. Here, we make note of various environmental agents and how best to assess exposure to them in the National Children's Study - a longitudinal epidemiologic study of children's health. Criteria for the analytical method of choice are discussed with particular emphasis on the need for long-term quality control and quality assurance measures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1076-1082
Number of pages7
JournalEnvironmental Health Perspectives
Volume113
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Health
Quality assurance
Quality control
Environmental Health
child health
Quality Control
Longitudinal Studies
Epidemiologic Studies
quality control
analytical method
exposure
matrix
Population
method
dose
Child Health
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Biomonitoring
  • Environmental monitoring questionnaire
  • Exposure assessment
  • Limit of detection
  • National children's study

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Needham, L. L., Özkaynak, H., Whyatt, R. M., Barr, D. B., Wang, R. Y., Naeher, L., ... Zartarian, V. (2005). Exposure assessment in the National Children's Study: Introduction. Environmental Health Perspectives, 113(8), 1076-1082. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.7613

Exposure assessment in the National Children's Study : Introduction. / Needham, Larry L.; Özkaynak, Halûk; Whyatt, Robin M.; Barr, Dana B.; Wang, Richard Y.; Naeher, Luke; Akland, Gerry; Bahadori, Tina; Bradman, Asa; Fortmann, Roy; Liu, L. J Sally; Morandi, Maria; O'Rourke, Mary Kay; Thomas, Kent; Quackenboss, James; Ryan, P. Barry; Zartarian, Valerie.

In: Environmental Health Perspectives, Vol. 113, No. 8, 08.2005, p. 1076-1082.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Needham, LL, Özkaynak, H, Whyatt, RM, Barr, DB, Wang, RY, Naeher, L, Akland, G, Bahadori, T, Bradman, A, Fortmann, R, Liu, LJS, Morandi, M, O'Rourke, MK, Thomas, K, Quackenboss, J, Ryan, PB & Zartarian, V 2005, 'Exposure assessment in the National Children's Study: Introduction', Environmental Health Perspectives, vol. 113, no. 8, pp. 1076-1082. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.7613
Needham LL, Özkaynak H, Whyatt RM, Barr DB, Wang RY, Naeher L et al. Exposure assessment in the National Children's Study: Introduction. Environmental Health Perspectives. 2005 Aug;113(8):1076-1082. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.7613
Needham, Larry L. ; Özkaynak, Halûk ; Whyatt, Robin M. ; Barr, Dana B. ; Wang, Richard Y. ; Naeher, Luke ; Akland, Gerry ; Bahadori, Tina ; Bradman, Asa ; Fortmann, Roy ; Liu, L. J Sally ; Morandi, Maria ; O'Rourke, Mary Kay ; Thomas, Kent ; Quackenboss, James ; Ryan, P. Barry ; Zartarian, Valerie. / Exposure assessment in the National Children's Study : Introduction. In: Environmental Health Perspectives. 2005 ; Vol. 113, No. 8. pp. 1076-1082.
@article{3c235c21a9ca4d47ac25f27fa500dace,
title = "Exposure assessment in the National Children's Study: Introduction",
abstract = "The science of exposure assessment is relatively new and evolving rapidly with the advancement of sophisticated methods for specific measurements at the picogram per gram level or lower in a variety of environmental and biologic matrices. Without this measurement capability, environmental health studies rely on questionnaires or other indirect means as the primary method to assess individual exposures. Although we use indirect methods, they are seldom used as stand-alone tools. Analyses of environmental and biologic samples have allowed us to get more precise data on exposure pathways, from sources to concentrations, to routes, to exposure, to doses. They also often allow a better estimation of the absorbed dose and its relation to potential adverse health outcomes in individuals and in populations. Here, we make note of various environmental agents and how best to assess exposure to them in the National Children's Study - a longitudinal epidemiologic study of children's health. Criteria for the analytical method of choice are discussed with particular emphasis on the need for long-term quality control and quality assurance measures.",
keywords = "Biomonitoring, Environmental monitoring questionnaire, Exposure assessment, Limit of detection, National children's study",
author = "Needham, {Larry L.} and Hal{\^u}k {\"O}zkaynak and Whyatt, {Robin M.} and Barr, {Dana B.} and Wang, {Richard Y.} and Luke Naeher and Gerry Akland and Tina Bahadori and Asa Bradman and Roy Fortmann and Liu, {L. J Sally} and Maria Morandi and O'Rourke, {Mary Kay} and Kent Thomas and James Quackenboss and Ryan, {P. Barry} and Valerie Zartarian",
year = "2005",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1289/ehp.7613",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "113",
pages = "1076--1082",
journal = "Environmental Health Perspectives",
issn = "0091-6765",
publisher = "Public Health Services, US Dept of Health and Human Services",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exposure assessment in the National Children's Study

T2 - Introduction

AU - Needham, Larry L.

AU - Özkaynak, Halûk

AU - Whyatt, Robin M.

AU - Barr, Dana B.

AU - Wang, Richard Y.

AU - Naeher, Luke

AU - Akland, Gerry

AU - Bahadori, Tina

AU - Bradman, Asa

AU - Fortmann, Roy

AU - Liu, L. J Sally

AU - Morandi, Maria

AU - O'Rourke, Mary Kay

AU - Thomas, Kent

AU - Quackenboss, James

AU - Ryan, P. Barry

AU - Zartarian, Valerie

PY - 2005/8

Y1 - 2005/8

N2 - The science of exposure assessment is relatively new and evolving rapidly with the advancement of sophisticated methods for specific measurements at the picogram per gram level or lower in a variety of environmental and biologic matrices. Without this measurement capability, environmental health studies rely on questionnaires or other indirect means as the primary method to assess individual exposures. Although we use indirect methods, they are seldom used as stand-alone tools. Analyses of environmental and biologic samples have allowed us to get more precise data on exposure pathways, from sources to concentrations, to routes, to exposure, to doses. They also often allow a better estimation of the absorbed dose and its relation to potential adverse health outcomes in individuals and in populations. Here, we make note of various environmental agents and how best to assess exposure to them in the National Children's Study - a longitudinal epidemiologic study of children's health. Criteria for the analytical method of choice are discussed with particular emphasis on the need for long-term quality control and quality assurance measures.

AB - The science of exposure assessment is relatively new and evolving rapidly with the advancement of sophisticated methods for specific measurements at the picogram per gram level or lower in a variety of environmental and biologic matrices. Without this measurement capability, environmental health studies rely on questionnaires or other indirect means as the primary method to assess individual exposures. Although we use indirect methods, they are seldom used as stand-alone tools. Analyses of environmental and biologic samples have allowed us to get more precise data on exposure pathways, from sources to concentrations, to routes, to exposure, to doses. They also often allow a better estimation of the absorbed dose and its relation to potential adverse health outcomes in individuals and in populations. Here, we make note of various environmental agents and how best to assess exposure to them in the National Children's Study - a longitudinal epidemiologic study of children's health. Criteria for the analytical method of choice are discussed with particular emphasis on the need for long-term quality control and quality assurance measures.

KW - Biomonitoring

KW - Environmental monitoring questionnaire

KW - Exposure assessment

KW - Limit of detection

KW - National children's study

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=23844524074&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=23844524074&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1289/ehp.7613

DO - 10.1289/ehp.7613

M3 - Article

C2 - 16079082

AN - SCOPUS:23844524074

VL - 113

SP - 1076

EP - 1082

JO - Environmental Health Perspectives

JF - Environmental Health Perspectives

SN - 0091-6765

IS - 8

ER -