Extending Data Worth Analyses to Select Multiple Observations Targeting Multiple Forecasts

Troels N. Vilhelmsen, Ty P.A. Ferré

Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

Abstract

Hydrological models are often set up to provide specific forecasts of interest. Owing to the inherent uncertainty in data used to derive model structure and used to constrain parameter variations, the model forecasts will be uncertain. Additional data collection is often performed to minimize this forecast uncertainty. Given our common financial restrictions, it is critical that we identify data with maximal information content with respect to forecast of interest. In practice, this often devolves to qualitative decisions based on expert opinion. However, there is no assurance that this will lead to optimal design, especially for complex hydrogeological problems. Specifically, these complexities include considerations of multiple forecasts, shared information among potential observations, information content of existing data, and the assumptions and simplifications underlying model construction. In the present study, we extend previous data worth analyses to include: simultaneous selection of multiple new measurements and consideration of multiple forecasts of interest. We show how the suggested approach can be used to optimize data collection. This can be used in a manner that suggests specific measurement sets or that produces probability maps indicating areas likely to be informative for specific forecasts. Moreover, we provide examples documenting that sequential measurement election approaches often lead to suboptimal designs and that estimates of data covariance should be included when selecting future measurement sets. Groundwater

LanguageEnglish (US)
JournalGroundwater
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2017

Fingerprint

targeting
forecast
Uncertainty
Model structures
Groundwater
Optimal design
election
groundwater
parameter
opinion
decision

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Water Science and Technology
  • Computers in Earth Sciences

Cite this

Extending Data Worth Analyses to Select Multiple Observations Targeting Multiple Forecasts. / Vilhelmsen, Troels N.; Ferré, Ty P.A.

In: Groundwater, 2017.

Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

@article{fb4923cc9a4d437fbe883034c29fd740,
title = "Extending Data Worth Analyses to Select Multiple Observations Targeting Multiple Forecasts",
abstract = "Hydrological models are often set up to provide specific forecasts of interest. Owing to the inherent uncertainty in data used to derive model structure and used to constrain parameter variations, the model forecasts will be uncertain. Additional data collection is often performed to minimize this forecast uncertainty. Given our common financial restrictions, it is critical that we identify data with maximal information content with respect to forecast of interest. In practice, this often devolves to qualitative decisions based on expert opinion. However, there is no assurance that this will lead to optimal design, especially for complex hydrogeological problems. Specifically, these complexities include considerations of multiple forecasts, shared information among potential observations, information content of existing data, and the assumptions and simplifications underlying model construction. In the present study, we extend previous data worth analyses to include: simultaneous selection of multiple new measurements and consideration of multiple forecasts of interest. We show how the suggested approach can be used to optimize data collection. This can be used in a manner that suggests specific measurement sets or that produces probability maps indicating areas likely to be informative for specific forecasts. Moreover, we provide examples documenting that sequential measurement election approaches often lead to suboptimal designs and that estimates of data covariance should be included when selecting future measurement sets. Groundwater",
author = "Vilhelmsen, {Troels N.} and Ferré, {Ty P.A.}",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1111/gwat.12595",
journal = "Ground Water",
issn = "0017-467X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Extending Data Worth Analyses to Select Multiple Observations Targeting Multiple Forecasts

AU - Vilhelmsen,Troels N.

AU - Ferré,Ty P.A.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Hydrological models are often set up to provide specific forecasts of interest. Owing to the inherent uncertainty in data used to derive model structure and used to constrain parameter variations, the model forecasts will be uncertain. Additional data collection is often performed to minimize this forecast uncertainty. Given our common financial restrictions, it is critical that we identify data with maximal information content with respect to forecast of interest. In practice, this often devolves to qualitative decisions based on expert opinion. However, there is no assurance that this will lead to optimal design, especially for complex hydrogeological problems. Specifically, these complexities include considerations of multiple forecasts, shared information among potential observations, information content of existing data, and the assumptions and simplifications underlying model construction. In the present study, we extend previous data worth analyses to include: simultaneous selection of multiple new measurements and consideration of multiple forecasts of interest. We show how the suggested approach can be used to optimize data collection. This can be used in a manner that suggests specific measurement sets or that produces probability maps indicating areas likely to be informative for specific forecasts. Moreover, we provide examples documenting that sequential measurement election approaches often lead to suboptimal designs and that estimates of data covariance should be included when selecting future measurement sets. Groundwater

AB - Hydrological models are often set up to provide specific forecasts of interest. Owing to the inherent uncertainty in data used to derive model structure and used to constrain parameter variations, the model forecasts will be uncertain. Additional data collection is often performed to minimize this forecast uncertainty. Given our common financial restrictions, it is critical that we identify data with maximal information content with respect to forecast of interest. In practice, this often devolves to qualitative decisions based on expert opinion. However, there is no assurance that this will lead to optimal design, especially for complex hydrogeological problems. Specifically, these complexities include considerations of multiple forecasts, shared information among potential observations, information content of existing data, and the assumptions and simplifications underlying model construction. In the present study, we extend previous data worth analyses to include: simultaneous selection of multiple new measurements and consideration of multiple forecasts of interest. We show how the suggested approach can be used to optimize data collection. This can be used in a manner that suggests specific measurement sets or that produces probability maps indicating areas likely to be informative for specific forecasts. Moreover, we provide examples documenting that sequential measurement election approaches often lead to suboptimal designs and that estimates of data covariance should be included when selecting future measurement sets. Groundwater

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029418868&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85029418868&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/gwat.12595

DO - 10.1111/gwat.12595

M3 - Article

JO - Ground Water

T2 - Ground Water

JF - Ground Water

SN - 0017-467X

ER -