Extensions of the Marcus equation for the prediction of approximate transition state geometries in hydrogen transfer and methyl transfer reactions

Paul Blowers, Richard I. Masel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

The objective of this work is to propose a way to calculate approximate transition state geometries that can then be used as initial guesses in ab initio calculations. Transition state geometries are calculated for 26 hydrogen transfer reactions and 6 methyl transfer reactions at the MP2/6-31G* and MP2/6-311 + +G(d,p) levels. Selected cases are also done at other levels including CCSD(T)/6-311 + + G(d,p). The transition state geometry obeys an equation which arises from an extension of the Marcus equation proposed by Blowers and Masel [8]: rtB + rtF/rB,equ + rF,equ = 1.25 ± 0.04 In this equation, rB,equ is the equilibrium bond length for the bond that breaks during the reaction, rF,equ is the equilibrium bond length for the new bond which forms. rtB and rtF are the bond lengths at the saddle point in the potential energy surface. rtB and rtF are found to obey (equation presented) with an average error of 0.04 Å. In the last two equations above, ΔU is the heat of reaction. E0A is the intrinsic barrier, and CA is a constant that comes from the model of Blowers and Masel [8]. It is proposed that the above three equations are useful in generating initial guesses for transition state geometries in ab initio calculations. In the cases that were tried, rapid convergence was found when these guesses were used.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)46-54
Number of pages9
JournalTheoretical Chemistry Accounts
Volume105
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2000

Keywords

  • Transition state
  • ab initio

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Extensions of the Marcus equation for the prediction of approximate transition state geometries in hydrogen transfer and methyl transfer reactions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this