Farm-scale evaluation of the impacts of transgenic cotton on biodiversity, pesticide use, and yield

Manda G. Cattaneo, Christine Yafuso, Chris Schmidt, Cho Ying Huang, Magfurar Rahman, Carl Olson, Christa Ellers-Kirk, Barron J Orr, Stuart Marsh, Larry Antilla, Pierre Dutilleul, Yves Carriere

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

146 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Higher yields and reduced pesticide impacts are needed to mitigate the effects of agricultural intensification. A 2-year farm-scale evaluation of 81 commercial fields in Arizona show that use of transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) cotton reduced insecticide use, whereas transgenic cotton with Bt protein and herbicide resistance (BtHr) did not affect herbicide use. Transgenic cotton had higher yield than nontransgenic cotton for any given number of insecticide applications. However, nontransgenic, Bt and BtHr cotton had similar yields overall, largely because higher insecticide use with nontransgenic cotton improved control of key pests. Unlike Bt and BtHr cotton, insecticides reduced the diversity of nontarget insects. Several other agronomic and ecological factors also affected biodiversity. Nevertheless, pairwise comparisons of diversity of nontarget insects in cotton fields with diversity in adjacent noncultivated sites revealed similar effects of cultivation of transgenic and nontransgenic cotton on biodiversity. The results indicate that impacts of agricultural intensification can be reduced when replacement of broad-spectrum insecticides by narrow-spectrum Bt crops does not reduce control of pests not affected by Bt crops.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)7571-7576
Number of pages6
JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Volume103
Issue number20
DOIs
StatePublished - May 16 2006

Fingerprint

Bacillus thuringiensis
Biodiversity
Pesticides
Insecticides
Herbicide Resistance
Pest Control
Insects
Proteins
Herbicides
Farms

Keywords

  • Agricultural sustainability
  • Environmental impact
  • Transgenic crops

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics
  • General

Cite this

Farm-scale evaluation of the impacts of transgenic cotton on biodiversity, pesticide use, and yield. / Cattaneo, Manda G.; Yafuso, Christine; Schmidt, Chris; Huang, Cho Ying; Rahman, Magfurar; Olson, Carl; Ellers-Kirk, Christa; Orr, Barron J; Marsh, Stuart; Antilla, Larry; Dutilleul, Pierre; Carriere, Yves.

In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 103, No. 20, 16.05.2006, p. 7571-7576.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cattaneo, Manda G. ; Yafuso, Christine ; Schmidt, Chris ; Huang, Cho Ying ; Rahman, Magfurar ; Olson, Carl ; Ellers-Kirk, Christa ; Orr, Barron J ; Marsh, Stuart ; Antilla, Larry ; Dutilleul, Pierre ; Carriere, Yves. / Farm-scale evaluation of the impacts of transgenic cotton on biodiversity, pesticide use, and yield. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2006 ; Vol. 103, No. 20. pp. 7571-7576.
@article{0356124e5e15497faec7b43efbeb1479,
title = "Farm-scale evaluation of the impacts of transgenic cotton on biodiversity, pesticide use, and yield",
abstract = "Higher yields and reduced pesticide impacts are needed to mitigate the effects of agricultural intensification. A 2-year farm-scale evaluation of 81 commercial fields in Arizona show that use of transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) cotton reduced insecticide use, whereas transgenic cotton with Bt protein and herbicide resistance (BtHr) did not affect herbicide use. Transgenic cotton had higher yield than nontransgenic cotton for any given number of insecticide applications. However, nontransgenic, Bt and BtHr cotton had similar yields overall, largely because higher insecticide use with nontransgenic cotton improved control of key pests. Unlike Bt and BtHr cotton, insecticides reduced the diversity of nontarget insects. Several other agronomic and ecological factors also affected biodiversity. Nevertheless, pairwise comparisons of diversity of nontarget insects in cotton fields with diversity in adjacent noncultivated sites revealed similar effects of cultivation of transgenic and nontransgenic cotton on biodiversity. The results indicate that impacts of agricultural intensification can be reduced when replacement of broad-spectrum insecticides by narrow-spectrum Bt crops does not reduce control of pests not affected by Bt crops.",
keywords = "Agricultural sustainability, Environmental impact, Transgenic crops",
author = "Cattaneo, {Manda G.} and Christine Yafuso and Chris Schmidt and Huang, {Cho Ying} and Magfurar Rahman and Carl Olson and Christa Ellers-Kirk and Orr, {Barron J} and Stuart Marsh and Larry Antilla and Pierre Dutilleul and Yves Carriere",
year = "2006",
month = "5",
day = "16",
doi = "10.1073/pnas.0508312103",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "103",
pages = "7571--7576",
journal = "Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America",
issn = "0027-8424",
number = "20",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Farm-scale evaluation of the impacts of transgenic cotton on biodiversity, pesticide use, and yield

AU - Cattaneo, Manda G.

AU - Yafuso, Christine

AU - Schmidt, Chris

AU - Huang, Cho Ying

AU - Rahman, Magfurar

AU - Olson, Carl

AU - Ellers-Kirk, Christa

AU - Orr, Barron J

AU - Marsh, Stuart

AU - Antilla, Larry

AU - Dutilleul, Pierre

AU - Carriere, Yves

PY - 2006/5/16

Y1 - 2006/5/16

N2 - Higher yields and reduced pesticide impacts are needed to mitigate the effects of agricultural intensification. A 2-year farm-scale evaluation of 81 commercial fields in Arizona show that use of transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) cotton reduced insecticide use, whereas transgenic cotton with Bt protein and herbicide resistance (BtHr) did not affect herbicide use. Transgenic cotton had higher yield than nontransgenic cotton for any given number of insecticide applications. However, nontransgenic, Bt and BtHr cotton had similar yields overall, largely because higher insecticide use with nontransgenic cotton improved control of key pests. Unlike Bt and BtHr cotton, insecticides reduced the diversity of nontarget insects. Several other agronomic and ecological factors also affected biodiversity. Nevertheless, pairwise comparisons of diversity of nontarget insects in cotton fields with diversity in adjacent noncultivated sites revealed similar effects of cultivation of transgenic and nontransgenic cotton on biodiversity. The results indicate that impacts of agricultural intensification can be reduced when replacement of broad-spectrum insecticides by narrow-spectrum Bt crops does not reduce control of pests not affected by Bt crops.

AB - Higher yields and reduced pesticide impacts are needed to mitigate the effects of agricultural intensification. A 2-year farm-scale evaluation of 81 commercial fields in Arizona show that use of transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) cotton reduced insecticide use, whereas transgenic cotton with Bt protein and herbicide resistance (BtHr) did not affect herbicide use. Transgenic cotton had higher yield than nontransgenic cotton for any given number of insecticide applications. However, nontransgenic, Bt and BtHr cotton had similar yields overall, largely because higher insecticide use with nontransgenic cotton improved control of key pests. Unlike Bt and BtHr cotton, insecticides reduced the diversity of nontarget insects. Several other agronomic and ecological factors also affected biodiversity. Nevertheless, pairwise comparisons of diversity of nontarget insects in cotton fields with diversity in adjacent noncultivated sites revealed similar effects of cultivation of transgenic and nontransgenic cotton on biodiversity. The results indicate that impacts of agricultural intensification can be reduced when replacement of broad-spectrum insecticides by narrow-spectrum Bt crops does not reduce control of pests not affected by Bt crops.

KW - Agricultural sustainability

KW - Environmental impact

KW - Transgenic crops

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646738074&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33646738074&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1073/pnas.0508312103

DO - 10.1073/pnas.0508312103

M3 - Article

VL - 103

SP - 7571

EP - 7576

JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

JF - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

SN - 0027-8424

IS - 20

ER -