Abstract
Genetic diversification of offspring represents a bet-hedging strategy that evolved as an adaptation to unpredictable environments. The benefits of sexual reproduction come with severe costs. For example, each offspring only carries half of each parent's genetic makeup through direct descent. The lower the reproductive rate, the more substantial the cost when considering the proportion of genes represented in subsequent generations. Positive assortative mating represents a conservative bet-hedging strategy that offsets some of these costs and preserves coadapted genomes in stable and predictable environments, whereas negative assortative mating serves the inverse function of genetic diversification in unstable and unpredictable environments.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 171-183 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Biodemography and Social Biology |
| Volume | 57 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 1 2011 |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Genetics
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Demography
- Anthropology
Cite this
Fecundity, Offspring Longevity, and assortative Mating : Parametric tradeoffs in sexual and life history strategy. / Wolf, Pedro S A; Figueredo, Aurelio J.
In: Biodemography and Social Biology, Vol. 57, No. 2, 01.01.2011, p. 171-183.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Fecundity, Offspring Longevity, and assortative Mating
T2 - Parametric tradeoffs in sexual and life history strategy
AU - Wolf, Pedro S A
AU - Figueredo, Aurelio J
PY - 2011/1/1
Y1 - 2011/1/1
N2 - Genetic diversification of offspring represents a bet-hedging strategy that evolved as an adaptation to unpredictable environments. The benefits of sexual reproduction come with severe costs. For example, each offspring only carries half of each parent's genetic makeup through direct descent. The lower the reproductive rate, the more substantial the cost when considering the proportion of genes represented in subsequent generations. Positive assortative mating represents a conservative bet-hedging strategy that offsets some of these costs and preserves coadapted genomes in stable and predictable environments, whereas negative assortative mating serves the inverse function of genetic diversification in unstable and unpredictable environments.
AB - Genetic diversification of offspring represents a bet-hedging strategy that evolved as an adaptation to unpredictable environments. The benefits of sexual reproduction come with severe costs. For example, each offspring only carries half of each parent's genetic makeup through direct descent. The lower the reproductive rate, the more substantial the cost when considering the proportion of genes represented in subsequent generations. Positive assortative mating represents a conservative bet-hedging strategy that offsets some of these costs and preserves coadapted genomes in stable and predictable environments, whereas negative assortative mating serves the inverse function of genetic diversification in unstable and unpredictable environments.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84857336960&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84857336960&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/19485565.2011.614569
DO - 10.1080/19485565.2011.614569
M3 - Article
C2 - 22329086
AN - SCOPUS:84857336960
VL - 57
SP - 171
EP - 183
JO - Biodemography and Social Biology
JF - Biodemography and Social Biology
SN - 1948-5565
IS - 2
ER -