Field trial of endotracheal intubation by basic EMTs

M. R. Sayre, J. C. Sakles, A. F. Mistler, J. L. Evans, A. T. Kramer, A. M. Pancioli, Daniel W Spaite

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

154 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study Objective: The 1994 basic-EMT (EMT-B) curriculum recommended teaching EMT-Bs the skill of endotracheal intubation. In this study we assessed the success and complication rates of endotracheal intubations in the field by EMT-Bs. Methods: We conducted a prospective clinical trial over a period of 28 months in an urban out-of-hospital EMS system. Four first- responder EMT-B engine companies with paramedic backup received 10 hours' intubation training in three sessions spread over at least 2 weeks. The training module was similar to that of the 1994 EMT-B curriculum and included at least 10 intubations on manikins. The EMTs used manikins with closed chest cavities to learn assessment of endotracheal-tube placement. Patients were eligible for intubation by the EMTs if they were apneic and older than 15 years. We calculated 95% confidence interval (CIs) for intubation success rates. Results: Sixty-six EMT-Bs passed the training examinations and were authorized to perform intubation in the field. Endotracheal intubation was attempted by EMTs in 103 patients; the attempt was successful in 53 (95% CI, 42% to 61%). All patients who were not intubated by EMT-Bs were intubated by paramedics, with the exception of six cases. One attempt at intubation was made in 52 patients, two attempts in 44, and three in 7. Three unrecognized esophageal intubations occurred. Conclusion: EMT-Bs trained in a short course successfully intubated about half the patients they encountered in this study. This low intubation success rate calls into question the validity of the endotracheal-intubation training module in the 1994 EMT-B national curriculum.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAnnals of Emergency Medicine
Volume31
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Intratracheal Intubation
Intubation
Curriculum
Manikins
Allied Health Personnel
Confidence Intervals
Urban Hospitals
Teaching
Thorax
Clinical Trials

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Sayre, M. R., Sakles, J. C., Mistler, A. F., Evans, J. L., Kramer, A. T., Pancioli, A. M., & Spaite, D. W. (1998). Field trial of endotracheal intubation by basic EMTs. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 31(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-0644(98)70312-9

Field trial of endotracheal intubation by basic EMTs. / Sayre, M. R.; Sakles, J. C.; Mistler, A. F.; Evans, J. L.; Kramer, A. T.; Pancioli, A. M.; Spaite, Daniel W.

In: Annals of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 31, No. 2, 1998.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sayre, MR, Sakles, JC, Mistler, AF, Evans, JL, Kramer, AT, Pancioli, AM & Spaite, DW 1998, 'Field trial of endotracheal intubation by basic EMTs', Annals of Emergency Medicine, vol. 31, no. 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-0644(98)70312-9
Sayre MR, Sakles JC, Mistler AF, Evans JL, Kramer AT, Pancioli AM et al. Field trial of endotracheal intubation by basic EMTs. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 1998;31(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-0644(98)70312-9
Sayre, M. R. ; Sakles, J. C. ; Mistler, A. F. ; Evans, J. L. ; Kramer, A. T. ; Pancioli, A. M. ; Spaite, Daniel W. / Field trial of endotracheal intubation by basic EMTs. In: Annals of Emergency Medicine. 1998 ; Vol. 31, No. 2.
@article{fb9656d0371242ae865d184b0a6a6082,
title = "Field trial of endotracheal intubation by basic EMTs",
abstract = "Study Objective: The 1994 basic-EMT (EMT-B) curriculum recommended teaching EMT-Bs the skill of endotracheal intubation. In this study we assessed the success and complication rates of endotracheal intubations in the field by EMT-Bs. Methods: We conducted a prospective clinical trial over a period of 28 months in an urban out-of-hospital EMS system. Four first- responder EMT-B engine companies with paramedic backup received 10 hours' intubation training in three sessions spread over at least 2 weeks. The training module was similar to that of the 1994 EMT-B curriculum and included at least 10 intubations on manikins. The EMTs used manikins with closed chest cavities to learn assessment of endotracheal-tube placement. Patients were eligible for intubation by the EMTs if they were apneic and older than 15 years. We calculated 95{\%} confidence interval (CIs) for intubation success rates. Results: Sixty-six EMT-Bs passed the training examinations and were authorized to perform intubation in the field. Endotracheal intubation was attempted by EMTs in 103 patients; the attempt was successful in 53 (95{\%} CI, 42{\%} to 61{\%}). All patients who were not intubated by EMT-Bs were intubated by paramedics, with the exception of six cases. One attempt at intubation was made in 52 patients, two attempts in 44, and three in 7. Three unrecognized esophageal intubations occurred. Conclusion: EMT-Bs trained in a short course successfully intubated about half the patients they encountered in this study. This low intubation success rate calls into question the validity of the endotracheal-intubation training module in the 1994 EMT-B national curriculum.",
author = "Sayre, {M. R.} and Sakles, {J. C.} and Mistler, {A. F.} and Evans, {J. L.} and Kramer, {A. T.} and Pancioli, {A. M.} and Spaite, {Daniel W}",
year = "1998",
doi = "10.1016/S0196-0644(98)70312-9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
journal = "Annals of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0196-0644",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Field trial of endotracheal intubation by basic EMTs

AU - Sayre, M. R.

AU - Sakles, J. C.

AU - Mistler, A. F.

AU - Evans, J. L.

AU - Kramer, A. T.

AU - Pancioli, A. M.

AU - Spaite, Daniel W

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - Study Objective: The 1994 basic-EMT (EMT-B) curriculum recommended teaching EMT-Bs the skill of endotracheal intubation. In this study we assessed the success and complication rates of endotracheal intubations in the field by EMT-Bs. Methods: We conducted a prospective clinical trial over a period of 28 months in an urban out-of-hospital EMS system. Four first- responder EMT-B engine companies with paramedic backup received 10 hours' intubation training in three sessions spread over at least 2 weeks. The training module was similar to that of the 1994 EMT-B curriculum and included at least 10 intubations on manikins. The EMTs used manikins with closed chest cavities to learn assessment of endotracheal-tube placement. Patients were eligible for intubation by the EMTs if they were apneic and older than 15 years. We calculated 95% confidence interval (CIs) for intubation success rates. Results: Sixty-six EMT-Bs passed the training examinations and were authorized to perform intubation in the field. Endotracheal intubation was attempted by EMTs in 103 patients; the attempt was successful in 53 (95% CI, 42% to 61%). All patients who were not intubated by EMT-Bs were intubated by paramedics, with the exception of six cases. One attempt at intubation was made in 52 patients, two attempts in 44, and three in 7. Three unrecognized esophageal intubations occurred. Conclusion: EMT-Bs trained in a short course successfully intubated about half the patients they encountered in this study. This low intubation success rate calls into question the validity of the endotracheal-intubation training module in the 1994 EMT-B national curriculum.

AB - Study Objective: The 1994 basic-EMT (EMT-B) curriculum recommended teaching EMT-Bs the skill of endotracheal intubation. In this study we assessed the success and complication rates of endotracheal intubations in the field by EMT-Bs. Methods: We conducted a prospective clinical trial over a period of 28 months in an urban out-of-hospital EMS system. Four first- responder EMT-B engine companies with paramedic backup received 10 hours' intubation training in three sessions spread over at least 2 weeks. The training module was similar to that of the 1994 EMT-B curriculum and included at least 10 intubations on manikins. The EMTs used manikins with closed chest cavities to learn assessment of endotracheal-tube placement. Patients were eligible for intubation by the EMTs if they were apneic and older than 15 years. We calculated 95% confidence interval (CIs) for intubation success rates. Results: Sixty-six EMT-Bs passed the training examinations and were authorized to perform intubation in the field. Endotracheal intubation was attempted by EMTs in 103 patients; the attempt was successful in 53 (95% CI, 42% to 61%). All patients who were not intubated by EMT-Bs were intubated by paramedics, with the exception of six cases. One attempt at intubation was made in 52 patients, two attempts in 44, and three in 7. Three unrecognized esophageal intubations occurred. Conclusion: EMT-Bs trained in a short course successfully intubated about half the patients they encountered in this study. This low intubation success rate calls into question the validity of the endotracheal-intubation training module in the 1994 EMT-B national curriculum.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0043151094&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0043151094&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0196-0644(98)70312-9

DO - 10.1016/S0196-0644(98)70312-9

M3 - Article

C2 - 9472186

AN - SCOPUS:0043151094

VL - 31

JO - Annals of Emergency Medicine

JF - Annals of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0196-0644

IS - 2

ER -