Fire fit: assessing comprehensive fitness and injury risk in the fire service

Gerald S. Poplin, Denise Roe, Jefferey L Burgess, Wayne F. Peate, Robin B Harris

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: This study sought to develop a comprehensive measure of fitness that is predictive of injury risk and can be used in the fire service to assess individual-level health and fit-for-duty status. Methods: A retrospective occupational cohort of 799 career fire service employees was observed over the years 2005–2009. An equally weighted score for comprehensive fitness was calculated based on cardiovascular fitness, muscular strength, endurance, flexibility, and body composition. Repeated measures survival analyses were used to estimate the risk of any injury, sprain or strain, and exercise-related injuries in relation to comprehensive fitness. Results: A well-distributed comprehensive fitness score was developed to distinguish three tiers of overall fitness status. Intraclass correlations identified flexibility, total grip strength, percent body fat, and resting heart rate as the most reliable fitness metrics, while push-ups, sit-ups, and aerobic capacity demonstrated poor reliability. In general, individuals with a lower comprehensive fitness status had an increased injury risk of injury as compared to the most fit individuals. The risk of any injury was 1.82 (95 % CI 1.06–3.11) times as likely for the least fit individuals, as compared to individuals in the top fire fitness category, increasing to 2.90 (95 % CI 1.48–5.66) when restricted to sprains and strains. Conclusions: This 5-year analysis of clinical occupational health assessments enabled the development of a relevant metric for relating comprehensive fitness with the risk of injury. Results were consistent with previous studies focused on cardiorespiratory fitness, but also less susceptible to inter-individual variability of discrete measurements.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)251-259
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health
Volume89
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2016

Fingerprint

Wounds and Injuries
Sprains and Strains
Hand Strength
Occupational Health
Survival Analysis
Body Composition
Health Status
Adipose Tissue
Heart Rate

Keywords

  • Firefighter
  • Injury risk
  • Occupational health and fitness

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Fire fit : assessing comprehensive fitness and injury risk in the fire service. / Poplin, Gerald S.; Roe, Denise; Burgess, Jefferey L; Peate, Wayne F.; Harris, Robin B.

In: International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, Vol. 89, No. 2, 01.02.2016, p. 251-259.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{924a7ff9fe1a4bd7a2e21551f20166b4,
title = "Fire fit: assessing comprehensive fitness and injury risk in the fire service",
abstract = "Purpose: This study sought to develop a comprehensive measure of fitness that is predictive of injury risk and can be used in the fire service to assess individual-level health and fit-for-duty status. Methods: A retrospective occupational cohort of 799 career fire service employees was observed over the years 2005–2009. An equally weighted score for comprehensive fitness was calculated based on cardiovascular fitness, muscular strength, endurance, flexibility, and body composition. Repeated measures survival analyses were used to estimate the risk of any injury, sprain or strain, and exercise-related injuries in relation to comprehensive fitness. Results: A well-distributed comprehensive fitness score was developed to distinguish three tiers of overall fitness status. Intraclass correlations identified flexibility, total grip strength, percent body fat, and resting heart rate as the most reliable fitness metrics, while push-ups, sit-ups, and aerobic capacity demonstrated poor reliability. In general, individuals with a lower comprehensive fitness status had an increased injury risk of injury as compared to the most fit individuals. The risk of any injury was 1.82 (95 {\%} CI 1.06–3.11) times as likely for the least fit individuals, as compared to individuals in the top fire fitness category, increasing to 2.90 (95 {\%} CI 1.48–5.66) when restricted to sprains and strains. Conclusions: This 5-year analysis of clinical occupational health assessments enabled the development of a relevant metric for relating comprehensive fitness with the risk of injury. Results were consistent with previous studies focused on cardiorespiratory fitness, but also less susceptible to inter-individual variability of discrete measurements.",
keywords = "Firefighter, Injury risk, Occupational health and fitness",
author = "Poplin, {Gerald S.} and Denise Roe and Burgess, {Jefferey L} and Peate, {Wayne F.} and Harris, {Robin B}",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00420-015-1068-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "89",
pages = "251--259",
journal = "International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health",
issn = "0340-0131",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fire fit

T2 - assessing comprehensive fitness and injury risk in the fire service

AU - Poplin, Gerald S.

AU - Roe, Denise

AU - Burgess, Jefferey L

AU - Peate, Wayne F.

AU - Harris, Robin B

PY - 2016/2/1

Y1 - 2016/2/1

N2 - Purpose: This study sought to develop a comprehensive measure of fitness that is predictive of injury risk and can be used in the fire service to assess individual-level health and fit-for-duty status. Methods: A retrospective occupational cohort of 799 career fire service employees was observed over the years 2005–2009. An equally weighted score for comprehensive fitness was calculated based on cardiovascular fitness, muscular strength, endurance, flexibility, and body composition. Repeated measures survival analyses were used to estimate the risk of any injury, sprain or strain, and exercise-related injuries in relation to comprehensive fitness. Results: A well-distributed comprehensive fitness score was developed to distinguish three tiers of overall fitness status. Intraclass correlations identified flexibility, total grip strength, percent body fat, and resting heart rate as the most reliable fitness metrics, while push-ups, sit-ups, and aerobic capacity demonstrated poor reliability. In general, individuals with a lower comprehensive fitness status had an increased injury risk of injury as compared to the most fit individuals. The risk of any injury was 1.82 (95 % CI 1.06–3.11) times as likely for the least fit individuals, as compared to individuals in the top fire fitness category, increasing to 2.90 (95 % CI 1.48–5.66) when restricted to sprains and strains. Conclusions: This 5-year analysis of clinical occupational health assessments enabled the development of a relevant metric for relating comprehensive fitness with the risk of injury. Results were consistent with previous studies focused on cardiorespiratory fitness, but also less susceptible to inter-individual variability of discrete measurements.

AB - Purpose: This study sought to develop a comprehensive measure of fitness that is predictive of injury risk and can be used in the fire service to assess individual-level health and fit-for-duty status. Methods: A retrospective occupational cohort of 799 career fire service employees was observed over the years 2005–2009. An equally weighted score for comprehensive fitness was calculated based on cardiovascular fitness, muscular strength, endurance, flexibility, and body composition. Repeated measures survival analyses were used to estimate the risk of any injury, sprain or strain, and exercise-related injuries in relation to comprehensive fitness. Results: A well-distributed comprehensive fitness score was developed to distinguish three tiers of overall fitness status. Intraclass correlations identified flexibility, total grip strength, percent body fat, and resting heart rate as the most reliable fitness metrics, while push-ups, sit-ups, and aerobic capacity demonstrated poor reliability. In general, individuals with a lower comprehensive fitness status had an increased injury risk of injury as compared to the most fit individuals. The risk of any injury was 1.82 (95 % CI 1.06–3.11) times as likely for the least fit individuals, as compared to individuals in the top fire fitness category, increasing to 2.90 (95 % CI 1.48–5.66) when restricted to sprains and strains. Conclusions: This 5-year analysis of clinical occupational health assessments enabled the development of a relevant metric for relating comprehensive fitness with the risk of injury. Results were consistent with previous studies focused on cardiorespiratory fitness, but also less susceptible to inter-individual variability of discrete measurements.

KW - Firefighter

KW - Injury risk

KW - Occupational health and fitness

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84955647726&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84955647726&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00420-015-1068-4

DO - 10.1007/s00420-015-1068-4

M3 - Article

C2 - 26126735

AN - SCOPUS:84955647726

VL - 89

SP - 251

EP - 259

JO - International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health

JF - International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health

SN - 0340-0131

IS - 2

ER -