First-episode services for psychotic disorders in the U.S. public sector: A pragmatic randomized controlled trial

Vinod H. Srihari, Cenk Tek, Suat Kucukgoncu, Vivek H. Phutane, Nicholas Jk Breitborde, Jessica Pollard, Banu Ozkan, John Saksa, Barbara C. Walsh, Scott W. Woods

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

51 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: This study sought to determine the effectiveness of a comprehensive first-episode service, the clinic for Specialized Treatment Early in Psychosis (STEP), in an urban U.S. community mental health center by comparing it with usual treatment. Methods: This pragmatic randomized controlled trial enrolled 120 patients with first-episode psychosis within five years of illness onset and 12 weeks of antipsychotic exposure. Referrals were mostly from inpatient psychiatric units, and enrollees were randomly allocated to STEP or usual treatment. Main outcomes included hospital utilization (primary); the ability to work or attend age-appropriate schooling - or to actively seek these opportunities (vocational engagement); and general functioning. Analysis was by modified intent to treat (excluding only three who withdrew consent) for hospitalization; for other outcomes, only data for completers were analyzed. Results: After one year, STEP participants had less inpatient utilization compared with those in usual treatment: no psychiatric hospitalizations, 77% versus 56% (risk ratio [RR]=1.38, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.08-1.58); mean hospitalizations, .33±.70 versus .68±.92 (p=.02); and mean bed-days, 5.34±13.53 versus 11.51±15.04 (p=.05). For every five patients allocated to STEP versus usual treatment, one additional patient avoided hospitalization over the first year (number needed to treat=5; CI=2.7-26.5). STEP participants also demonstrated better vocational engagement (91.7% versus 66.7%; RR=1.40, CI=1.18-1.48) and showed salutary trends in global functioning measures. Conclusions: This trial demonstrated the feasibility and effectiveness of a U.S. public-sector model of early intervention for psychotic illnesses. Such services can also support translational research and are a relevant model for other serious mental illnesses.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)705-712
Number of pages8
JournalPsychiatric Services
Volume66
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2015

Fingerprint

Public Sector
Psychotic Disorders
Randomized Controlled Trials
Hospitalization
Therapeutics
Confidence Intervals
Psychiatry
Inpatients
Odds Ratio
Community Mental Health Centers
Numbers Needed To Treat
Aptitude
Translational Medical Research
Antipsychotic Agents
Referral and Consultation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

First-episode services for psychotic disorders in the U.S. public sector : A pragmatic randomized controlled trial. / Srihari, Vinod H.; Tek, Cenk; Kucukgoncu, Suat; Phutane, Vivek H.; Breitborde, Nicholas Jk; Pollard, Jessica; Ozkan, Banu; Saksa, John; Walsh, Barbara C.; Woods, Scott W.

In: Psychiatric Services, Vol. 66, No. 7, 01.07.2015, p. 705-712.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Srihari, VH, Tek, C, Kucukgoncu, S, Phutane, VH, Breitborde, NJ, Pollard, J, Ozkan, B, Saksa, J, Walsh, BC & Woods, SW 2015, 'First-episode services for psychotic disorders in the U.S. public sector: A pragmatic randomized controlled trial', Psychiatric Services, vol. 66, no. 7, pp. 705-712. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201400236
Srihari, Vinod H. ; Tek, Cenk ; Kucukgoncu, Suat ; Phutane, Vivek H. ; Breitborde, Nicholas Jk ; Pollard, Jessica ; Ozkan, Banu ; Saksa, John ; Walsh, Barbara C. ; Woods, Scott W. / First-episode services for psychotic disorders in the U.S. public sector : A pragmatic randomized controlled trial. In: Psychiatric Services. 2015 ; Vol. 66, No. 7. pp. 705-712.
@article{e740ef286ae249b7a300ac5c63fc1bad,
title = "First-episode services for psychotic disorders in the U.S. public sector: A pragmatic randomized controlled trial",
abstract = "Objective: This study sought to determine the effectiveness of a comprehensive first-episode service, the clinic for Specialized Treatment Early in Psychosis (STEP), in an urban U.S. community mental health center by comparing it with usual treatment. Methods: This pragmatic randomized controlled trial enrolled 120 patients with first-episode psychosis within five years of illness onset and 12 weeks of antipsychotic exposure. Referrals were mostly from inpatient psychiatric units, and enrollees were randomly allocated to STEP or usual treatment. Main outcomes included hospital utilization (primary); the ability to work or attend age-appropriate schooling - or to actively seek these opportunities (vocational engagement); and general functioning. Analysis was by modified intent to treat (excluding only three who withdrew consent) for hospitalization; for other outcomes, only data for completers were analyzed. Results: After one year, STEP participants had less inpatient utilization compared with those in usual treatment: no psychiatric hospitalizations, 77{\%} versus 56{\%} (risk ratio [RR]=1.38, 95{\%} confidence interval [CI]=1.08-1.58); mean hospitalizations, .33±.70 versus .68±.92 (p=.02); and mean bed-days, 5.34±13.53 versus 11.51±15.04 (p=.05). For every five patients allocated to STEP versus usual treatment, one additional patient avoided hospitalization over the first year (number needed to treat=5; CI=2.7-26.5). STEP participants also demonstrated better vocational engagement (91.7{\%} versus 66.7{\%}; RR=1.40, CI=1.18-1.48) and showed salutary trends in global functioning measures. Conclusions: This trial demonstrated the feasibility and effectiveness of a U.S. public-sector model of early intervention for psychotic illnesses. Such services can also support translational research and are a relevant model for other serious mental illnesses.",
author = "Srihari, {Vinod H.} and Cenk Tek and Suat Kucukgoncu and Phutane, {Vivek H.} and Breitborde, {Nicholas Jk} and Jessica Pollard and Banu Ozkan and John Saksa and Walsh, {Barbara C.} and Woods, {Scott W.}",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1176/appi.ps.201400236",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "66",
pages = "705--712",
journal = "Psychiatric Services",
issn = "1075-2730",
publisher = "American Psychiatric Association",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - First-episode services for psychotic disorders in the U.S. public sector

T2 - A pragmatic randomized controlled trial

AU - Srihari, Vinod H.

AU - Tek, Cenk

AU - Kucukgoncu, Suat

AU - Phutane, Vivek H.

AU - Breitborde, Nicholas Jk

AU - Pollard, Jessica

AU - Ozkan, Banu

AU - Saksa, John

AU - Walsh, Barbara C.

AU - Woods, Scott W.

PY - 2015/7/1

Y1 - 2015/7/1

N2 - Objective: This study sought to determine the effectiveness of a comprehensive first-episode service, the clinic for Specialized Treatment Early in Psychosis (STEP), in an urban U.S. community mental health center by comparing it with usual treatment. Methods: This pragmatic randomized controlled trial enrolled 120 patients with first-episode psychosis within five years of illness onset and 12 weeks of antipsychotic exposure. Referrals were mostly from inpatient psychiatric units, and enrollees were randomly allocated to STEP or usual treatment. Main outcomes included hospital utilization (primary); the ability to work or attend age-appropriate schooling - or to actively seek these opportunities (vocational engagement); and general functioning. Analysis was by modified intent to treat (excluding only three who withdrew consent) for hospitalization; for other outcomes, only data for completers were analyzed. Results: After one year, STEP participants had less inpatient utilization compared with those in usual treatment: no psychiatric hospitalizations, 77% versus 56% (risk ratio [RR]=1.38, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.08-1.58); mean hospitalizations, .33±.70 versus .68±.92 (p=.02); and mean bed-days, 5.34±13.53 versus 11.51±15.04 (p=.05). For every five patients allocated to STEP versus usual treatment, one additional patient avoided hospitalization over the first year (number needed to treat=5; CI=2.7-26.5). STEP participants also demonstrated better vocational engagement (91.7% versus 66.7%; RR=1.40, CI=1.18-1.48) and showed salutary trends in global functioning measures. Conclusions: This trial demonstrated the feasibility and effectiveness of a U.S. public-sector model of early intervention for psychotic illnesses. Such services can also support translational research and are a relevant model for other serious mental illnesses.

AB - Objective: This study sought to determine the effectiveness of a comprehensive first-episode service, the clinic for Specialized Treatment Early in Psychosis (STEP), in an urban U.S. community mental health center by comparing it with usual treatment. Methods: This pragmatic randomized controlled trial enrolled 120 patients with first-episode psychosis within five years of illness onset and 12 weeks of antipsychotic exposure. Referrals were mostly from inpatient psychiatric units, and enrollees were randomly allocated to STEP or usual treatment. Main outcomes included hospital utilization (primary); the ability to work or attend age-appropriate schooling - or to actively seek these opportunities (vocational engagement); and general functioning. Analysis was by modified intent to treat (excluding only three who withdrew consent) for hospitalization; for other outcomes, only data for completers were analyzed. Results: After one year, STEP participants had less inpatient utilization compared with those in usual treatment: no psychiatric hospitalizations, 77% versus 56% (risk ratio [RR]=1.38, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.08-1.58); mean hospitalizations, .33±.70 versus .68±.92 (p=.02); and mean bed-days, 5.34±13.53 versus 11.51±15.04 (p=.05). For every five patients allocated to STEP versus usual treatment, one additional patient avoided hospitalization over the first year (number needed to treat=5; CI=2.7-26.5). STEP participants also demonstrated better vocational engagement (91.7% versus 66.7%; RR=1.40, CI=1.18-1.48) and showed salutary trends in global functioning measures. Conclusions: This trial demonstrated the feasibility and effectiveness of a U.S. public-sector model of early intervention for psychotic illnesses. Such services can also support translational research and are a relevant model for other serious mental illnesses.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84936066993&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84936066993&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1176/appi.ps.201400236

DO - 10.1176/appi.ps.201400236

M3 - Article

C2 - 25639994

AN - SCOPUS:84936066993

VL - 66

SP - 705

EP - 712

JO - Psychiatric Services

JF - Psychiatric Services

SN - 1075-2730

IS - 7

ER -