Fitting the UNION2.1 supernova sample with the R h = ct universe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The analysis of Type Ia supernova data over the past decade has been a notable success story in cosmology. These standard candles offer us an unparalleled opportunity to study the cosmological expansion out to a redshift of 1.5. The consensus today appears to be that ΛCDM offers the best explanation for the luminosity-distance relationship seen in these events. However, a significant incompatibility is now emerging between the standard model and other equally important observations, such as those of the cosmic microwave background. ΛCDM does not provide an accurate representation of the cosmological expansion at high redshifts (z ≫ 2). It is therefore essential to re-analyze the Type Ia supernova data in light of the cosmology (the R h = ct universe) that best represents the universe's dynamical evolution at early times. In this paper, we directly compare the distance relationship in ΛCDM with that predicted by R h = ct, and each with the Union2.1 sample, and show that the two theories produce virtually indistinguishable profiles, though the fit with R h = ct has not yet been optimized. This is because the data cannot be determined independently of the assumed cosmology - the supernova luminosities must be evaluated by optimizing four parameters simultaneously with those in the adopted model. This renders the data compliant to the underlying theory, so the model-dependent data reduction should not be ignored in any comparative analysis between competing cosmologies. In this paper, we use R h = ct to fit the data reduced with ΛCDM, and though quite promising, the match is not perfect. An even better fit would result with an optimization of the data using R h = ct from the beginning.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number110
JournalAstronomical Journal
Volume144
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2012

Fingerprint

cosmology
supernovae
universe
luminosity
incompatibility
expansion
data reduction
emerging
microwaves
optimization
profiles

Keywords

  • cosmic background radiation
  • cosmological parameters
  • cosmology: observations
  • cosmology: theory
  • distance scale
  • supernovae: general

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Space and Planetary Science
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics

Cite this

Fitting the UNION2.1 supernova sample with the R h = ct universe. / Melia, Fulvio.

In: Astronomical Journal, Vol. 144, No. 4, 110, 10.2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{949a04c7bf004323971db2faaba87d0d,
title = "Fitting the UNION2.1 supernova sample with the R h = ct universe",
abstract = "The analysis of Type Ia supernova data over the past decade has been a notable success story in cosmology. These standard candles offer us an unparalleled opportunity to study the cosmological expansion out to a redshift of 1.5. The consensus today appears to be that ΛCDM offers the best explanation for the luminosity-distance relationship seen in these events. However, a significant incompatibility is now emerging between the standard model and other equally important observations, such as those of the cosmic microwave background. ΛCDM does not provide an accurate representation of the cosmological expansion at high redshifts (z ≫ 2). It is therefore essential to re-analyze the Type Ia supernova data in light of the cosmology (the R h = ct universe) that best represents the universe's dynamical evolution at early times. In this paper, we directly compare the distance relationship in ΛCDM with that predicted by R h = ct, and each with the Union2.1 sample, and show that the two theories produce virtually indistinguishable profiles, though the fit with R h = ct has not yet been optimized. This is because the data cannot be determined independently of the assumed cosmology - the supernova luminosities must be evaluated by optimizing four parameters simultaneously with those in the adopted model. This renders the data compliant to the underlying theory, so the model-dependent data reduction should not be ignored in any comparative analysis between competing cosmologies. In this paper, we use R h = ct to fit the data reduced with ΛCDM, and though quite promising, the match is not perfect. An even better fit would result with an optimization of the data using R h = ct from the beginning.",
keywords = "cosmic background radiation, cosmological parameters, cosmology: observations, cosmology: theory, distance scale, supernovae: general",
author = "Fulvio Melia",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1088/0004-6256/144/4/110",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "144",
journal = "Astronomical Journal",
issn = "0004-6256",
publisher = "IOP Publishing Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fitting the UNION2.1 supernova sample with the R h = ct universe

AU - Melia, Fulvio

PY - 2012/10

Y1 - 2012/10

N2 - The analysis of Type Ia supernova data over the past decade has been a notable success story in cosmology. These standard candles offer us an unparalleled opportunity to study the cosmological expansion out to a redshift of 1.5. The consensus today appears to be that ΛCDM offers the best explanation for the luminosity-distance relationship seen in these events. However, a significant incompatibility is now emerging between the standard model and other equally important observations, such as those of the cosmic microwave background. ΛCDM does not provide an accurate representation of the cosmological expansion at high redshifts (z ≫ 2). It is therefore essential to re-analyze the Type Ia supernova data in light of the cosmology (the R h = ct universe) that best represents the universe's dynamical evolution at early times. In this paper, we directly compare the distance relationship in ΛCDM with that predicted by R h = ct, and each with the Union2.1 sample, and show that the two theories produce virtually indistinguishable profiles, though the fit with R h = ct has not yet been optimized. This is because the data cannot be determined independently of the assumed cosmology - the supernova luminosities must be evaluated by optimizing four parameters simultaneously with those in the adopted model. This renders the data compliant to the underlying theory, so the model-dependent data reduction should not be ignored in any comparative analysis between competing cosmologies. In this paper, we use R h = ct to fit the data reduced with ΛCDM, and though quite promising, the match is not perfect. An even better fit would result with an optimization of the data using R h = ct from the beginning.

AB - The analysis of Type Ia supernova data over the past decade has been a notable success story in cosmology. These standard candles offer us an unparalleled opportunity to study the cosmological expansion out to a redshift of 1.5. The consensus today appears to be that ΛCDM offers the best explanation for the luminosity-distance relationship seen in these events. However, a significant incompatibility is now emerging between the standard model and other equally important observations, such as those of the cosmic microwave background. ΛCDM does not provide an accurate representation of the cosmological expansion at high redshifts (z ≫ 2). It is therefore essential to re-analyze the Type Ia supernova data in light of the cosmology (the R h = ct universe) that best represents the universe's dynamical evolution at early times. In this paper, we directly compare the distance relationship in ΛCDM with that predicted by R h = ct, and each with the Union2.1 sample, and show that the two theories produce virtually indistinguishable profiles, though the fit with R h = ct has not yet been optimized. This is because the data cannot be determined independently of the assumed cosmology - the supernova luminosities must be evaluated by optimizing four parameters simultaneously with those in the adopted model. This renders the data compliant to the underlying theory, so the model-dependent data reduction should not be ignored in any comparative analysis between competing cosmologies. In this paper, we use R h = ct to fit the data reduced with ΛCDM, and though quite promising, the match is not perfect. An even better fit would result with an optimization of the data using R h = ct from the beginning.

KW - cosmic background radiation

KW - cosmological parameters

KW - cosmology: observations

KW - cosmology: theory

KW - distance scale

KW - supernovae: general

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866371249&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84866371249&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1088/0004-6256/144/4/110

DO - 10.1088/0004-6256/144/4/110

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84866371249

VL - 144

JO - Astronomical Journal

JF - Astronomical Journal

SN - 0004-6256

IS - 4

M1 - 110

ER -