Fixed and random effects in nonlinear panel data model: A discussion of a paper by Manuel Arellano and Jinyong Hahn

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

INTRODUCTION It was a pleasure to serve as the discussant for this session. The authors have played a major role in developing the area under discussion. The paper is very good so that my role is to comment rather than criticize. I will discuss a connection between reducing the estimation bias in a fixed effects model versus reducing misspecification bias in a random effects model. For this discussion, I use the framework of Woutersen (2002). Woutersen (2002) proposes to use a moment that approximately separates the parameter of interest from the individual parameters. Let zi denote that data on individual i, let αi be the individual parameter and let θ be the common parameter. Then, for any likelihood model, a moment function g (α, θ) = σi g i (α, θ, z i)/N can be constructed with the properties (i) Eg (α0, θ0) = 0 where {α0, θ0} denote the true parameter values and (ii) Eg αi (α0, θ0) = 0 for all i, that is, the partial derivative of the moment function with respect to αi is zero for all i. Condition (ii) means that the moment function depends somewhat less on α. The moment function g (α, θ) is then integrated with respect to the likelihood L i (α, θ) and the prior π(αi;θ), Inference is then based on the integrated moment by minimizing with respect to θ.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationAdvances in Economics and Econometrics: Theory and Applications, Ninth World Congress, Volume III
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages410-412
Number of pages3
ISBN (Print)9780511607547, 0521871522, 9780521871549
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Fixed effects
Random effects
Integrated
Fixed effects model
Random effects model
Misspecification
Derivatives
Inference
Pleasure

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)

Cite this

Woutersen, T. M. (2010). Fixed and random effects in nonlinear panel data model: A discussion of a paper by Manuel Arellano and Jinyong Hahn. In Advances in Economics and Econometrics: Theory and Applications, Ninth World Congress, Volume III (pp. 410-412). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607547.014

Fixed and random effects in nonlinear panel data model : A discussion of a paper by Manuel Arellano and Jinyong Hahn. / Woutersen, Tiemen M.

Advances in Economics and Econometrics: Theory and Applications, Ninth World Congress, Volume III. Cambridge University Press, 2010. p. 410-412.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Woutersen, TM 2010, Fixed and random effects in nonlinear panel data model: A discussion of a paper by Manuel Arellano and Jinyong Hahn. in Advances in Economics and Econometrics: Theory and Applications, Ninth World Congress, Volume III. Cambridge University Press, pp. 410-412. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607547.014
Woutersen TM. Fixed and random effects in nonlinear panel data model: A discussion of a paper by Manuel Arellano and Jinyong Hahn. In Advances in Economics and Econometrics: Theory and Applications, Ninth World Congress, Volume III. Cambridge University Press. 2010. p. 410-412 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607547.014
Woutersen, Tiemen M. / Fixed and random effects in nonlinear panel data model : A discussion of a paper by Manuel Arellano and Jinyong Hahn. Advances in Economics and Econometrics: Theory and Applications, Ninth World Congress, Volume III. Cambridge University Press, 2010. pp. 410-412
@inbook{fc56f5e956a34a40903d0cb0696f77a7,
title = "Fixed and random effects in nonlinear panel data model: A discussion of a paper by Manuel Arellano and Jinyong Hahn",
abstract = "INTRODUCTION It was a pleasure to serve as the discussant for this session. The authors have played a major role in developing the area under discussion. The paper is very good so that my role is to comment rather than criticize. I will discuss a connection between reducing the estimation bias in a fixed effects model versus reducing misspecification bias in a random effects model. For this discussion, I use the framework of Woutersen (2002). Woutersen (2002) proposes to use a moment that approximately separates the parameter of interest from the individual parameters. Let zi denote that data on individual i, let αi be the individual parameter and let θ be the common parameter. Then, for any likelihood model, a moment function g (α, θ) = σi g i (α, θ, z i)/N can be constructed with the properties (i) Eg (α0, θ0) = 0 where {α0, θ0} denote the true parameter values and (ii) Eg αi (α0, θ0) = 0 for all i, that is, the partial derivative of the moment function with respect to αi is zero for all i. Condition (ii) means that the moment function depends somewhat less on α. The moment function g (α, θ) is then integrated with respect to the likelihood L i (α, θ) and the prior π(αi;θ), Inference is then based on the integrated moment by minimizing with respect to θ.",
author = "Woutersen, {Tiemen M}",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9780511607547.014",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780511607547",
pages = "410--412",
booktitle = "Advances in Economics and Econometrics: Theory and Applications, Ninth World Congress, Volume III",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Fixed and random effects in nonlinear panel data model

T2 - A discussion of a paper by Manuel Arellano and Jinyong Hahn

AU - Woutersen, Tiemen M

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - INTRODUCTION It was a pleasure to serve as the discussant for this session. The authors have played a major role in developing the area under discussion. The paper is very good so that my role is to comment rather than criticize. I will discuss a connection between reducing the estimation bias in a fixed effects model versus reducing misspecification bias in a random effects model. For this discussion, I use the framework of Woutersen (2002). Woutersen (2002) proposes to use a moment that approximately separates the parameter of interest from the individual parameters. Let zi denote that data on individual i, let αi be the individual parameter and let θ be the common parameter. Then, for any likelihood model, a moment function g (α, θ) = σi g i (α, θ, z i)/N can be constructed with the properties (i) Eg (α0, θ0) = 0 where {α0, θ0} denote the true parameter values and (ii) Eg αi (α0, θ0) = 0 for all i, that is, the partial derivative of the moment function with respect to αi is zero for all i. Condition (ii) means that the moment function depends somewhat less on α. The moment function g (α, θ) is then integrated with respect to the likelihood L i (α, θ) and the prior π(αi;θ), Inference is then based on the integrated moment by minimizing with respect to θ.

AB - INTRODUCTION It was a pleasure to serve as the discussant for this session. The authors have played a major role in developing the area under discussion. The paper is very good so that my role is to comment rather than criticize. I will discuss a connection between reducing the estimation bias in a fixed effects model versus reducing misspecification bias in a random effects model. For this discussion, I use the framework of Woutersen (2002). Woutersen (2002) proposes to use a moment that approximately separates the parameter of interest from the individual parameters. Let zi denote that data on individual i, let αi be the individual parameter and let θ be the common parameter. Then, for any likelihood model, a moment function g (α, θ) = σi g i (α, θ, z i)/N can be constructed with the properties (i) Eg (α0, θ0) = 0 where {α0, θ0} denote the true parameter values and (ii) Eg αi (α0, θ0) = 0 for all i, that is, the partial derivative of the moment function with respect to αi is zero for all i. Condition (ii) means that the moment function depends somewhat less on α. The moment function g (α, θ) is then integrated with respect to the likelihood L i (α, θ) and the prior π(αi;θ), Inference is then based on the integrated moment by minimizing with respect to θ.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84924155940&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84924155940&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9780511607547.014

DO - 10.1017/CBO9780511607547.014

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84924155940

SN - 9780511607547

SN - 0521871522

SN - 9780521871549

SP - 410

EP - 412

BT - Advances in Economics and Econometrics: Theory and Applications, Ninth World Congress, Volume III

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -