Flat-panel digital mammography system: Contrast-detail comparison between screen-film radiographs and hard-copy images

Sankararaman Suryanarayanan, Andrew Karellas, Srinivasan Vedantham, Hetal Ved, Stephen P. Baker, Carl J. D'Orsi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

68 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the contrast-detail (CD) characteristics of screen-film (SF) and postprocessed digital images by using a phantom-based method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Images of a CD phantom with polymerized methyl methacrylate were acquired with SF and full-field digital mammography systems at matched exposure conditions. A four-alternative forced-choice experiment was conducted with seven observers participating in the study. Each observer was required to identify randomly located disks in phantom images from which detection curves were computed. The CD diagrams for the SF and digital systems were estimated from the detection curves and compared at 50% and 62.5% threshold levels. Furthermore, a theoretic model was used to estimate the CD performance of the SF and digital systems. RESULTS: Analysis of covariance for mixed models was used with the natural logarithm of disk thickness as the dependent variable, the natural logarithm of disk diameter as the covariate, and the observer as a random factor. The results of statistical analysis indicated significant differences between the CD characteristics of SF and digital mammographic images at both 50% (P < .001) and 62.5% (P < .001) detection thresholds. CONCLUSION: The authors conclude that digital CD curves, on average, exhibit threshold contrast characteristics that are lower (better) than those of SF mammography.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)801-807
Number of pages7
JournalRadiology
Volume225
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Mammography
Methacrylates
Theoretical Models

Keywords

  • Breast neoplasms, radiography
  • Breast radiography, comparative studies
  • Breast radiography, technology
  • Phantoms
  • Radiography, digital

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Flat-panel digital mammography system : Contrast-detail comparison between screen-film radiographs and hard-copy images. / Suryanarayanan, Sankararaman; Karellas, Andrew; Vedantham, Srinivasan; Ved, Hetal; Baker, Stephen P.; D'Orsi, Carl J.

In: Radiology, Vol. 225, No. 3, 12.2002, p. 801-807.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Suryanarayanan, Sankararaman ; Karellas, Andrew ; Vedantham, Srinivasan ; Ved, Hetal ; Baker, Stephen P. ; D'Orsi, Carl J. / Flat-panel digital mammography system : Contrast-detail comparison between screen-film radiographs and hard-copy images. In: Radiology. 2002 ; Vol. 225, No. 3. pp. 801-807.
@article{74e6747a8ecd4eafb59ae94eb4c05a34,
title = "Flat-panel digital mammography system: Contrast-detail comparison between screen-film radiographs and hard-copy images",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To compare the contrast-detail (CD) characteristics of screen-film (SF) and postprocessed digital images by using a phantom-based method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Images of a CD phantom with polymerized methyl methacrylate were acquired with SF and full-field digital mammography systems at matched exposure conditions. A four-alternative forced-choice experiment was conducted with seven observers participating in the study. Each observer was required to identify randomly located disks in phantom images from which detection curves were computed. The CD diagrams for the SF and digital systems were estimated from the detection curves and compared at 50{\%} and 62.5{\%} threshold levels. Furthermore, a theoretic model was used to estimate the CD performance of the SF and digital systems. RESULTS: Analysis of covariance for mixed models was used with the natural logarithm of disk thickness as the dependent variable, the natural logarithm of disk diameter as the covariate, and the observer as a random factor. The results of statistical analysis indicated significant differences between the CD characteristics of SF and digital mammographic images at both 50{\%} (P < .001) and 62.5{\%} (P < .001) detection thresholds. CONCLUSION: The authors conclude that digital CD curves, on average, exhibit threshold contrast characteristics that are lower (better) than those of SF mammography.",
keywords = "Breast neoplasms, radiography, Breast radiography, comparative studies, Breast radiography, technology, Phantoms, Radiography, digital",
author = "Sankararaman Suryanarayanan and Andrew Karellas and Srinivasan Vedantham and Hetal Ved and Baker, {Stephen P.} and D'Orsi, {Carl J.}",
year = "2002",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1148/radiol.2253011736",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "225",
pages = "801--807",
journal = "Radiology",
issn = "0033-8419",
publisher = "Radiological Society of North America Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Flat-panel digital mammography system

T2 - Contrast-detail comparison between screen-film radiographs and hard-copy images

AU - Suryanarayanan, Sankararaman

AU - Karellas, Andrew

AU - Vedantham, Srinivasan

AU - Ved, Hetal

AU - Baker, Stephen P.

AU - D'Orsi, Carl J.

PY - 2002/12

Y1 - 2002/12

N2 - PURPOSE: To compare the contrast-detail (CD) characteristics of screen-film (SF) and postprocessed digital images by using a phantom-based method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Images of a CD phantom with polymerized methyl methacrylate were acquired with SF and full-field digital mammography systems at matched exposure conditions. A four-alternative forced-choice experiment was conducted with seven observers participating in the study. Each observer was required to identify randomly located disks in phantom images from which detection curves were computed. The CD diagrams for the SF and digital systems were estimated from the detection curves and compared at 50% and 62.5% threshold levels. Furthermore, a theoretic model was used to estimate the CD performance of the SF and digital systems. RESULTS: Analysis of covariance for mixed models was used with the natural logarithm of disk thickness as the dependent variable, the natural logarithm of disk diameter as the covariate, and the observer as a random factor. The results of statistical analysis indicated significant differences between the CD characteristics of SF and digital mammographic images at both 50% (P < .001) and 62.5% (P < .001) detection thresholds. CONCLUSION: The authors conclude that digital CD curves, on average, exhibit threshold contrast characteristics that are lower (better) than those of SF mammography.

AB - PURPOSE: To compare the contrast-detail (CD) characteristics of screen-film (SF) and postprocessed digital images by using a phantom-based method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Images of a CD phantom with polymerized methyl methacrylate were acquired with SF and full-field digital mammography systems at matched exposure conditions. A four-alternative forced-choice experiment was conducted with seven observers participating in the study. Each observer was required to identify randomly located disks in phantom images from which detection curves were computed. The CD diagrams for the SF and digital systems were estimated from the detection curves and compared at 50% and 62.5% threshold levels. Furthermore, a theoretic model was used to estimate the CD performance of the SF and digital systems. RESULTS: Analysis of covariance for mixed models was used with the natural logarithm of disk thickness as the dependent variable, the natural logarithm of disk diameter as the covariate, and the observer as a random factor. The results of statistical analysis indicated significant differences between the CD characteristics of SF and digital mammographic images at both 50% (P < .001) and 62.5% (P < .001) detection thresholds. CONCLUSION: The authors conclude that digital CD curves, on average, exhibit threshold contrast characteristics that are lower (better) than those of SF mammography.

KW - Breast neoplasms, radiography

KW - Breast radiography, comparative studies

KW - Breast radiography, technology

KW - Phantoms

KW - Radiography, digital

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036892552&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036892552&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1148/radiol.2253011736

DO - 10.1148/radiol.2253011736

M3 - Article

C2 - 12461264

AN - SCOPUS:0036892552

VL - 225

SP - 801

EP - 807

JO - Radiology

JF - Radiology

SN - 0033-8419

IS - 3

ER -