Forum report: Issues in the evaluation of diagnostic tests, use of historical controls, and merits of the current multicenter collaborative groups

John E. Bennett, Carol Kauffman, Thomas Walsh, Ben De Pauw, William Dismukes, John Galgiani, Michel Glauser, Raoul Herbrecht, Jeannette Lee, Peter Pappas, John Powers, John Rex, Paul Verweij, Claudio Viscoli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

This forum report contains conclusions about 3 different issues relevant to conducting clinical trials in deep mycoses. (1) Trials of diagnostic tests for deep mycoses must define the population appropriate for testing and the clinical question being asked. The unanswered question for the serum Aspergillus galactomannan assay is whether knowledge of results can change use of empirical therapy to treat febrile patients at high risk of invasive aspergillosis. (2) Use of historical controls is suboptimal but offers a pragmatic solution for studying rare mycoses; use of contemporaneous controls, matched for critical variables and evaluated by a blinded data review committee using detailed criteria, appears optimal. (3) Established groups of independent investigators, such as the European Organization for Research on Treatment of Cancer's Invasive Fungal Infections Group and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases's Bacteriology and Mycology Study Group, provide a pool of experienced investigators, defined operating rules, impartiality, and specialized expertise. Considering the enormous investment required for adequately powered efficacy trials of antifungal agents and the importance of these trials to guide clinical practice, use of collaborative groups outweighs the extra administrative time that is sometimes required.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)S123-S127
JournalClinical Infectious Diseases
Volume36
Issue numberSUPPL. 3
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 15 2003

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Microbiology (medical)
  • Infectious Diseases

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Forum report: Issues in the evaluation of diagnostic tests, use of historical controls, and merits of the current multicenter collaborative groups'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Bennett, J. E., Kauffman, C., Walsh, T., De Pauw, B., Dismukes, W., Galgiani, J., Glauser, M., Herbrecht, R., Lee, J., Pappas, P., Powers, J., Rex, J., Verweij, P., & Viscoli, C. (2003). Forum report: Issues in the evaluation of diagnostic tests, use of historical controls, and merits of the current multicenter collaborative groups. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 36(SUPPL. 3), S123-S127. https://doi.org/10.1086/367840