Framework for a collaborative process to increase preparation for drought on U.S. public rangelands

Julie V Brugger, Kelsey L. Hawkes, Anne M. Bowen, Mitchel McClaran

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We describe a theoretically based framework (C-PMT+HAPA) for designing and evaluating collaborative processes to increase preparation for natural hazards in situations in which preparedness decisions are shared and actions must be taken jointly by more than one party. The framework combines two health behavior change theories from psychology, protection motivation theory (PMT) and the health action process approach (HAPA), with collaboration theory in natural resources management. The framework provides much needed guidance for designing the activities in which participants will collaborate and suggests theoretically supported intermediate outcomes that may indicate a successful trajectory toward the ultimate goal of increased preparation. We used this framework in a collaborative process, with participation by ranchers with grazing permits and U.S. Forest Service managers on the Tonto National Forest, to increase preparation for drought on public rangelands in the Southwestern U.S. Evaluation of intermediate outcomes indicated: (1) improved interactions and relations between parties; (2) improved ability to appraise drought risks; (3) improved understanding of the U.S. Forest Service process for approving practices that increase preparation for drought; and; (4) increased motivation to implement these practices. The strength of the intermediate outcomes suggests that the C-PMT+HAPA framework would be an effective, theoretically supported framework for designing and evaluating collaborative processes to encourage preparation for natural hazards. More generally, the framework could contribute to more transdisciplinary, system-and action-oriented research on disaster risk reduction that is coproduced with multiple stakeholders.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number18
JournalEcology and Society
Volume23
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2018

Fingerprint

rangeland
drought
natural hazard
action research
psychology
disaster
resource management
stakeholder
natural resource
grazing
trajectory
public
health
services

Keywords

  • Collaborative management
  • Design and evaluation
  • Drought planning
  • Health action planning approach
  • Natural hazards
  • Protection motivation theory
  • Scenario planning
  • Social-ecological model
  • Usable information

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology

Cite this

Framework for a collaborative process to increase preparation for drought on U.S. public rangelands. / Brugger, Julie V; Hawkes, Kelsey L.; Bowen, Anne M.; McClaran, Mitchel.

In: Ecology and Society, Vol. 23, No. 4, 18, 01.12.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e3e2f0a23388446390119c4003abd762,
title = "Framework for a collaborative process to increase preparation for drought on U.S. public rangelands",
abstract = "We describe a theoretically based framework (C-PMT+HAPA) for designing and evaluating collaborative processes to increase preparation for natural hazards in situations in which preparedness decisions are shared and actions must be taken jointly by more than one party. The framework combines two health behavior change theories from psychology, protection motivation theory (PMT) and the health action process approach (HAPA), with collaboration theory in natural resources management. The framework provides much needed guidance for designing the activities in which participants will collaborate and suggests theoretically supported intermediate outcomes that may indicate a successful trajectory toward the ultimate goal of increased preparation. We used this framework in a collaborative process, with participation by ranchers with grazing permits and U.S. Forest Service managers on the Tonto National Forest, to increase preparation for drought on public rangelands in the Southwestern U.S. Evaluation of intermediate outcomes indicated: (1) improved interactions and relations between parties; (2) improved ability to appraise drought risks; (3) improved understanding of the U.S. Forest Service process for approving practices that increase preparation for drought; and; (4) increased motivation to implement these practices. The strength of the intermediate outcomes suggests that the C-PMT+HAPA framework would be an effective, theoretically supported framework for designing and evaluating collaborative processes to encourage preparation for natural hazards. More generally, the framework could contribute to more transdisciplinary, system-and action-oriented research on disaster risk reduction that is coproduced with multiple stakeholders.",
keywords = "Collaborative management, Design and evaluation, Drought planning, Health action planning approach, Natural hazards, Protection motivation theory, Scenario planning, Social-ecological model, Usable information",
author = "Brugger, {Julie V} and Hawkes, {Kelsey L.} and Bowen, {Anne M.} and Mitchel McClaran",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5751/ES-10503-230418",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
journal = "Ecology and Society",
issn = "1708-3087",
publisher = "The Resilience Alliance",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Framework for a collaborative process to increase preparation for drought on U.S. public rangelands

AU - Brugger, Julie V

AU - Hawkes, Kelsey L.

AU - Bowen, Anne M.

AU - McClaran, Mitchel

PY - 2018/12/1

Y1 - 2018/12/1

N2 - We describe a theoretically based framework (C-PMT+HAPA) for designing and evaluating collaborative processes to increase preparation for natural hazards in situations in which preparedness decisions are shared and actions must be taken jointly by more than one party. The framework combines two health behavior change theories from psychology, protection motivation theory (PMT) and the health action process approach (HAPA), with collaboration theory in natural resources management. The framework provides much needed guidance for designing the activities in which participants will collaborate and suggests theoretically supported intermediate outcomes that may indicate a successful trajectory toward the ultimate goal of increased preparation. We used this framework in a collaborative process, with participation by ranchers with grazing permits and U.S. Forest Service managers on the Tonto National Forest, to increase preparation for drought on public rangelands in the Southwestern U.S. Evaluation of intermediate outcomes indicated: (1) improved interactions and relations between parties; (2) improved ability to appraise drought risks; (3) improved understanding of the U.S. Forest Service process for approving practices that increase preparation for drought; and; (4) increased motivation to implement these practices. The strength of the intermediate outcomes suggests that the C-PMT+HAPA framework would be an effective, theoretically supported framework for designing and evaluating collaborative processes to encourage preparation for natural hazards. More generally, the framework could contribute to more transdisciplinary, system-and action-oriented research on disaster risk reduction that is coproduced with multiple stakeholders.

AB - We describe a theoretically based framework (C-PMT+HAPA) for designing and evaluating collaborative processes to increase preparation for natural hazards in situations in which preparedness decisions are shared and actions must be taken jointly by more than one party. The framework combines two health behavior change theories from psychology, protection motivation theory (PMT) and the health action process approach (HAPA), with collaboration theory in natural resources management. The framework provides much needed guidance for designing the activities in which participants will collaborate and suggests theoretically supported intermediate outcomes that may indicate a successful trajectory toward the ultimate goal of increased preparation. We used this framework in a collaborative process, with participation by ranchers with grazing permits and U.S. Forest Service managers on the Tonto National Forest, to increase preparation for drought on public rangelands in the Southwestern U.S. Evaluation of intermediate outcomes indicated: (1) improved interactions and relations between parties; (2) improved ability to appraise drought risks; (3) improved understanding of the U.S. Forest Service process for approving practices that increase preparation for drought; and; (4) increased motivation to implement these practices. The strength of the intermediate outcomes suggests that the C-PMT+HAPA framework would be an effective, theoretically supported framework for designing and evaluating collaborative processes to encourage preparation for natural hazards. More generally, the framework could contribute to more transdisciplinary, system-and action-oriented research on disaster risk reduction that is coproduced with multiple stakeholders.

KW - Collaborative management

KW - Design and evaluation

KW - Drought planning

KW - Health action planning approach

KW - Natural hazards

KW - Protection motivation theory

KW - Scenario planning

KW - Social-ecological model

KW - Usable information

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059469634&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059469634&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5751/ES-10503-230418

DO - 10.5751/ES-10503-230418

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85059469634

VL - 23

JO - Ecology and Society

JF - Ecology and Society

SN - 1708-3087

IS - 4

M1 - 18

ER -